Radeon HD 7870

Sergei Travkin
Well, after the release of 2011, no one forgot about 1155.
Can't the hair dryer2 x4 3.5 MHz cope with Assashka 3? Apparently they say the truth for sure, the future belongs to the boxes. I downloaded it, put it in the shaitan-box and went through any game as well as Assashka 3.

Well, after the release of 2011, no one forgot about 1155.
these are different segments. But 1155 and 1150 are one segment.

Sergey Travkin
Yes 1155 a successful socket it will live a long time, as well as 775 in due time.

but it's okay to play Assassin's creed 3 right now

Spoileroch-ooh-oho .. Seryozha betrayed AMD because of some kind of console crooked shit ... :)

SpoilerI looked at the system requirements of Assashki 3, there is nothing in the Middle Kingdom, it is not even high requirements.
Operating system: Vista, 7
Processor: Core 2 Duo E8200 - 2.6 GHz or Athlon II X4 620 Core 2 Quad Q9400 - 3.0 GHz or Phenom II X4 940
Video card: GeForce 8800GT or Radeon HD4850, (512 MB) GeForce 600 or Radeon HD7000, (1024 MB)
RAM: 2048 MB 4096 MB
Free hard disk space: 11009 MB

19Alex75
and now download it, go to Boston and see what its actual requirements are.

Seryoga, at the moment I do not have such an opportunity due to the absence of a more or less playable Persian. Then, for the sake of interest, I try it, but at my resolution in 1280x1024 everything can be said if it doesn't fly, then it runs :)

19Alex75
there nothing depends on the resolution, the emphasis is on the processor.

Sergey Travkin
Into the processor or core frequency of this processor? Why, then, Assassin's requirements are understated than they really should be? Like you play, pulls. As you say, I reached Boston, hung up and ran for a new stone, and with it, possibly a new mother, etc. etc. ... Why are there so many Persians in this Boston that a simple 4-core processor with a frequency of 3.5-4.0 MHz is not enough? Well, this once again confirms the curvature of the developers of this game when porting it for PC. It's just that if the developers are not fools should release a patch with an emphasis on optimizing their brainchild. Otherwise, fans of the PC version of this game will spit on it all and go to the squad of console players. IMHO.

This once again confirms the curvature of the developers of this game.

Spoilery indeed. A crooked hack this game, in terms of optimizations. A modern processor, in fact, has nothing to calculate there. The video card is even more so, because the graphics are there in 2008.

-Sergey Viktorovich-
there is something or not, and now it is stable at 60fps with rare drawdowns up to 38-40. In many games, with the naked eye, the difference with the phenom is visible - in Assassin's creed 2, Brotherhood, Revelations, 3, Far cry 3 with HDAO enabled, in physics games in general, heaven and earth - the difference is 3-3.5 times. Windows boots faster, the air in the room does not heat up at all, the computer runs quieter.

Sergei Travkin
Norm buy, what to justify?

Sergei Travkin
And then, oh, I tried to convey this to you. Now it is more relevant what to collect, what to upgrade with the transition to 1155, and even if not enough, be patient, save up money and take 1155 socket, than old hair dryers or new FXs. Hair dryers were relevant, but their time was gone with the advent of Intel's 1155 socket. AMD had a chance for rehabilitation, but by releasing their failed FX they missed their chance and even with the number of cores with their high frequency they do not catch up with Intel 1155. IMHO.

Sergey Travkin
has something or not, and now it is stable at 60fps with rare drawdowns up to 38-40.

You make a gap, Seryozhka, and you don't blush. What a scoundrel ..
http://www.overclockers.ua/video/geforce-gtx680-palit-jetstream/all/
Even the overclocked 7970 barely reaches 50 fps in your beloved Boston.
And it's paired with an Intel Core i7-3930K @ 4.4GHz processor.
The minimum is 38.5 fps.
By the way, I have the same min. fps on my system, and the average is 50-55 fps, which is generally quite close to the results in the article (I mean the overclocked GTX680).

PS: I see that you unstuck your 7850 to 2000 MHz. Otherwise, it's hard for me to explain such agility ..;)

-Sergey Viktorovich-
that is, you put your squalor on a par with Intel Core i7-3930K @ 4.4 GHz? I will disappoint. As for the test, I don't set the anti-aliasing to "very high", adapted specifically for NV, that's the whole explanation. I accept written apologies at any time.

oh yes, about nonsense: http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/assassins-creed-iii-test-gpu.html - add bule 8150 ~ 30%, we get your Vishera - level i3. So there is still a big question, who has 38-60fps, and who the processor is not capable of producing even with the most powerful video card.

Sergei Travkin
As for the test, I don't set anti-aliasing to "very high", adapted specifically for NV, that's the whole explanation.

where does nvidia then? For nvidia, there are separate options: TXAA and FXAA, which, by the way, are turned on for me, i.e. take resources from the map. Now everything is clear with you - turn on the graphics for the minimum, and your config will surpass the Core i7-3930K + pech690, which work on the max settings in the game ... Smart guy, damn it.

-Sergey Viktorovich,
you turned it on for a long time already on the minimum, because you have no other ways to get the minimum 38fps. All my life there have been no AMD processors in Assassin's creed, but here on you, Seryozhin FX suddenly began to work at the level of 3930K in these games. Yet on the other side of the scale, AMD fans look very different.

And as for my nonsense, here's a screen from your favorite gamegpu



looking at the HD7870, which will be equal to 7850 in average overclocking, and disabled "very high" anti-aliasing, we apologize.

Sergey Travkin
Serezhin FX suddenly started working at the 3930K level in these games.

no, not quite up to par. 38 fps in that article, the minimum is paired with the overclocked radic 7970, which merges nvidia in this game to the fullest.
The gtx680 overclocked has a minimum of 45 fps, while mine is 37 fps. It is precisely the difference in the power of the stones that affects. But the average FPS is similar, yes. Above 50 fps for me.

here's a screen with your favorite gamegpu,

yes. We look at the result of pech670 in the test and we see 45 fps minimum. I have 37 fps. The difference is due to the difference in processors, and the average is about the same.

we look at the HD7870, which will be equal to 7850 in average overclocking,

I don’t see your "and now it is stable 60fps with rare drawdowns up to 38-40." :)

PS: damn it, because of this fucking ossosin, I had to put this worthless game again, in order to make sure personally again.

The game is still being played, I'll unsubscribe later .. If you can get to Boston quickly. If it doesn't work, I'll unsubscribe tomorrow.

-Sergey Viktorovich-
just wrote down: the

options are visible, at least 37.5fps.