Optimizon-optimon, where is it? (Fallout 4)
Already fig knows what patch, but the optimon has not yet been delivered to the radios. That on the first version, when looking at the "texture" ones, the FPS jumped from 29 to 33, that with the extreme patch, the same thing. Am I the only one so lucky?PsiX_Storrent
While Bethesda rapes the old engine, there will be no optimism.
Yin-Ro-Gan
what should be done with the engine so that 4 GB of video memory would give out 29 fps?
How much video memory? On my 7850 with 1 gig it is the same, and if there were a 2 gig version, then there would be no such problems. About two years ago, 1 gig was back to back, and now it is only suitable for "minimum wages". The most interesting thing is that if I took 2 gigabytes, I would not have known any problems until now.
Oh, 4 GB, well, tohda xs.
PsiX_Storrent
And you still have the power of the video card determined by the number of GB of memory?
PsiX_Storrent
There is a Texture Optimization Project, this is +20/30 fps, personally I had 30-50, now 50-60 ...
So I played a little, waited for the patches, realized that all the garbage and "passed" the game on YouTube ... (
Bethesda, why are you doing this? ((
PsiX_Storrent
"What should be done with the engine so that 4 GB of video memory would give 29 fps?"
facepalm
where does the amount of video memory and the number of frames per second?
what can be the optimism on your 7850? 29-33 frames is a ceiling for her, and jumps at 4 fps are absolutely normal.
tesla707
You even confused. I played with the settings (so that the consumption of video memory does not exceed a gig) and play at high with stable 60-80 fps.
And the amount of video memory will determine whether the game wakes up to freeze (load textures).
Lisstoman
If I say that it is built on a 512-bit bus with one of the most powerful Hawai GPUs with unlocked power supplies, and the memory has the highest bandwidth G-DDR5 interface, would you appreciate its potential? If yes, then I am glad, and the mention of the number of GBs means that the card launched last year's blockboosters on the ultras, but the fall does not go
Ratigan667
On my 7850
I played with the settings (so that the consumption of video memory does not exceed a gig) and play at high with stable 60-80 fps.
Lord, where do you come from such storytellers.
What fairy tales, all for garlic. I played around with the drawing range, turned off unnecessary effects and the problem disappeared.
This is done very easily. You turn on any program showing the amount of video memory consumed and slowly adjust the graphics settings.
Ratigan667
What a fairy tale, all for garlic. I played around with the drawing range, turned off unnecessary effects and the problem disappeared.
Yes, you can play with the settings as much as you like, all the same, your vidyakha will not jump above your head, no matter how hard you try and convince yourself of this, it just looks pretty stupid from the outside.
This is done very easily. You turn on any program showing the amount of video memory consumed and slowly adjust the graphics settings.
There you have already been hinted above that it is far from just memory, or you think that if all the games work fine on your stump for sculpting 4giga, there are still a bunch of components in the video that affect performance, core frequency, unified shaders, texture blocks, after all, the same video memory frequency.
290 is a relatively normal card, but on ultras the game loads the processor normally. if you reduce the range of any renderings, the FPS should increase - if it will be, since it is not strange this is a processor.
you can separately monitor the card and processor. sure in cities at ultra the load on the card is 70-80%
MunchkiN 616
silt is that both at the minimum and at the ultra the FPS is the same, 33 - 29 fps, this is depressing.