3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
A
Angelica04 19.11.21 01:22 pm

What about the rest of the world? (Fallout 4)

It is clear from the game that the United States has annexed Canada. They were destroyed by the war, China was destroyed by the Americans in retaliation. Mexico was also destroyed by China. Plus Europe may have been destroyed, as was the Middle East. Between them there was a war for resources, as we know, plus a civil war in Europe. They were pretty shabby even before the great war. Although Alistair Tenpenny, for example, arrived in Washington from England. So living people remained in Europe, and they are even able to cross the ocean. And what about South America. With Africa. There was absolutely no point in bombing them, not the United States, not China. And what about Australia? With India, with Japan, with South Asia (although it may have been annexed by China and destroyed)? Is there a chance that not all countries have been destroyed?
PS For me it would be so interesting if the new part or DLS would muddy the invasion of colonists from Africa, South America or Europe.
21 Comments
Sort by:
_
_nick69_ 19.11.21

All that is known is here: http://ru.fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout_Wiki

B
BlackTea 19.11.21

Angelica04
There are some more. The nuclear winter and radioactive fallout affected EVERYONE.

s
scorg94 19.11.21

BlackTea
It seems that they did not have a nuclear winter, and the precipitation is yes, killed almost everyone.

M
Morag_Tong 19.11.21

the author's ignorance killed the desire for any joint reasoning

D
Dаli 19.11.21

Is there a chance that not all countries have been destroyed? There is no such chance, hardly at least one country was able to maintain the infrastructure in the first years after the war (except perhaps a tough dictatorship and then remotely). And the question of atomic winter and the first atomic fallout is open. If there is anything left, it will be regional formations of the NKR type. In general, no one would have survived, but there would have been no fallout, then either a refugee would never have met anyone alive, there is a good film "On the Last Shore" about this, a more realistic picture emerges there, a film without bright special effects, but that's all in fact, and very sad, I recommend.

H
Hans Stahl 19.11.21

BlackTea There is no
nuclear winter in Follich's world, as it is based on scientific theories of the 50s, 60s.

B
BlackTea 19.11.21

Hans Stahl
She is mentioned in several notes, such as "Hide from the Nuclear Winter in the workplace!".

M
MunchkiN 616 19.11.21

nuclear winter and it will not be very good to do so, and if the bombs are like in magaton, then there are about a million such bombs.
and look for all sorts of ghouls and mutants in fullout here. probably they swam across the ocean like the Vikings and built their bases with wax.

M
Mavladiy1988 19.11.21

MunchkiN 616 learn
Russian, I'm ashamed of my country (

M
Morfine 19.11.21

What became interesting with Australia?

D
Dаli 19.11.21

Mavladiy1988
Lol

B
Booock 19.11.21

The author wondered what happened to Africa after these events)) Yes, nothing)) Do you know what is happening with Africa now?
So in 100 or 100500 years, everything will remain the same there - Africa.

V
Verzor 19.11.21

Slippery topic. It is assumed, probably, that about the same as with America - everything was bombed to hell, smashed - there are no neutral states left, except, indeed, maybe African countries. But the landscape there is about the same even without the bombing. )

A
Atay Wolverine 19.11.21

According to the scenario, a nuclear war plunged the whole world into chaos. Or maybe the Americans are just offended that if they exchanged nuclear strikes with China and arranged an armageddon for each other, the rest of the world would have survived this war more or less well and rose at the expense of their stupidity?

e
enrikokarvales 19.11.21

Atai Wolverine
would not have survived the nuclear winter that covered most of the planet, plus radiation, the black car pulled out, so even America did not feel the consequences for itself, but what to say about nuclear strikes

H
Harfius jackson 19.11.21

Russia is most likely destroyed.

W
WFGSS 19.11.21

Booock
as they say: Africa, it is everywhere "Africa".

s
sonuly 19.11.21

I read it .... and laughed heartily. Children, in Soviet times it was calculated that the accumulated nuclear weapons could destroy the planet more than 20 times. It can simply be split into pieces with the nuclear weapons available at that time. 10 Satan missiles could destroy 70% of American industrial potential. By the way, the era of disarmament began with these scientifically based forecasts and figures.
Surprisingly, although the potential of the United States and Russia is now significantly reduced, it is still capable of destroying the planet several times.
Even if you detonate the charges in YOUR territory. Somehow the world has changed in recent years, has ceased to feel the threat of fascism and a nuclear conflict between the United States and Russia. What does China have to do with it ?! Do not make me laugh. Even now, Soviet-made bombs are used in Syria, and the atomic weapons of the USSR are still a very serious thing. Very, very ..... we would have been crushed by the United States long ago as "radroaches" if it weren't for him. Only such a stupid country as Turkey can make provocations against Russia.
In general, people here correctly noticed that in the nuclear conflict between Russia and the United States, and earlier the USSR, other countries and continents will be destroyed, and by what right. In general, nuclear weapons are not weapons of "mass destruction", but a means of mass destruction of people and their environment. This has already been proven by its first use in Japan and the Chernobyl disaster. And if you drop a "megaton" to an industrial nuclear power plant, what will happen? And that since the times of the USSR, charges have been laid in the Atlantic Ocean, allegedly for "raising" the tsunami towards the United States .... including all island countries and territories ..... And there are a lot of ways to destroy the planet, and you here - "there will be a nuclear winter can't "funny ....

A
Alexander Asadchiy 19.11.21

sonuly that's
all true. But no one will throw atomic rockets in a solid carpet. Such weapons were originally sharpened to destroy large concentrations of troops and people of the enemy. Well, zhahnut in New York and those in response to Moscow. But around that village there is no point in bombing ......

I'm not familiar with lore. I believe that the only logical option is heavy precipitation. And this is theoretically correct. The massive use of weapons will provoke a nuclear winter. There will be a bunch of radioactive rubbish in the air that will envelop the entire planet. And as a result, the same parsley will be everywhere as in Boston.

But on the other side there is New Vegas. It was not bombed during the war and the people there remained intact. So there was no winter. Or was and survived. The one who remembers what happened to New Vegas and will say what happened in Africa

A
AlexeyMC 19.11.21

Harfius Jackson
Come on, in Russia, most likely, they will even notice that something has changed when new American films will not appear for a long time ... And so, it will not differ much from what is now ...

And by the way, in our national football team will have a chance to become world champions! But small ...