Internet Commissioners v2
Start here http://forums.playground.ru/talk/society/komissary_interneta-205893/This topic is about the fact that the authorities, in some countries, are propagandizing not only in controlled media, but also on the Internet. For example, in China, incredible amounts of money are spent on Umaodan (a fifty-cent party), to pay bloggers who post pro-government posts on the Internet, for each post 50 cents.
Here is a link to a first-person story of paid greyhound writers who have penetrated into the domestic database, writing for taxpayers' money.
http://pora-valit.livejournal.com/4175090.html
"Lyudmila Savchuk (the one who brought the Kremlin bot factory to court) published the second portion of the plum from Savushkin.
Now you will have fewer questions about where the commentators under our posts come from and why they freeze such homeric nonsense. But there are more questions - where and why Russian taxes are spent.
The first part about Kremlin bots is here: http://www.sguschenka.com/151126-troll (there is more explanation of who they are and what they do)
But technical information, working methods, salaries, examples and scolding, taken from here:
https: / /www.facebook.com/mulbabar/posts/922182567864131 0 project "Mulbabar"
TROLLS AT WORK (Continuation)
Lyudmila Savchuk about unknown details of the life of political trolls
If you remember my story about the escape from the troll factory, then here are some more details and rules for the operation of a typical kremlebot - and a little about his inner world. If you don’t remember, I would like to inform you: in St. Petersburg, at 55 Savushkina Street, there is a troll factory where pictures, videos and comments are produced that make the Internet a territory of hatred. I got a job there to learn more about kremlebots, and then tell you about them. Previously, this factory, as you know, was located in Olgino.
My very moment to run away from the Olgins, losing my slippers and dodging around the yards, came when it finally dawned on the main trolls of the factory who was the bad person, who was the radish that published their lists, manuals and examples of comments. You can probably read other examples of such comments below, under this post ...... "
stalker7162534
to pay bloggers who post pro-government posts on the Internet, for each post 50 cents.
So why are you hysterical when they comment negatively about guests who have come here for an indefinite period of time.
In general, if the state diligently spends incredible sums on propaganda, then it’s pissing at something, it means there’s something to hide, then not everything is so perfect. The same China socialism with socialism (even a bit of capitalism seems to be not harmful), such as such a powerful state, and is afraid of some kind of fucking free access to the Internet for its electorate. So some shit is diligently throwing hay. Otherwise, why be afraid.
It is generally accepted that on the Internet, unlike other media, there is such a thing as "freedom of speech". Because of this misconception, many people naively think that information on the Internet differs favorably from television, newspapers or radio in terms of plausibility. And this is true even if the Internet provides, in principle, the same information with the same subtext and for the same purposes, only paraphrased differently, so that an already not too sighted man in the street does not notice even more that in fact he was tricked. If we proceed from the assumption that belief in news on the Internet is greater than belief in news in other media, then it is foolish to refuse the possibility of free ideological pressure on the mass of people. If I were an employee of the FSB, I would certainly take up the issue of "purity" of information,
1. The Great Soviet Encyclopedia defines propaganda as the dissemination of political, philosophical, scientific, artistic and other views and ideas with the aim of introducing them into public consciousness and enhancing mass practical activity. The main elements of the propaganda process: its subject (a social group whose interests are expressed by propaganda), content, forms and methods, means or channels of propaganda (radio, television, print, a system of lecture propaganda, etc.), an object (audience or social communities to which the propaganda is directed). Decisive for understanding the process of propaganda are the social interests of its subject, their relationship with the interests of society as a whole and individual groups to which the propaganda is directed. This determines its content and has a significant impact on the choice of forms, methods and means of propaganda [1].
2. Encyclopedia Britannica defines propaganda as follows: “Propaganda, dissemination of information - facts, arguments, rumors, half-truths, or lies - to influence public opinion. Propaganda is a more or less systematic effort to manipulate the beliefs, attitudes or actions of others through symbols (words, gestures, posters, monuments, music, clothing, decals, hairstyles, designs on coins and postage stamps, etc.). Premeditation and a relatively strong emphasis on manipulation distinguish propaganda from ordinary communication or the free and easy exchange of ideas. The propagandist has a specific goal or set of goals. To achieve them, the propagandist deliberately selects facts, arguments and symbols and presents them in such a way as to achieve the greatest effect. To maximize the effect,
This is for the lazy ones from Wikipedia (not sure how to provide a link).
Then everything is simple, very simple. Depending on the radicalism of your views and the degree of trust or skepticism to the policy pursued by the leadership of your country, choose either the first or the second option.
But ... whether you like it or not, propaganda was, is and will be an integral part of the policy of any state.
And by the way, can anyone remember how the Great and Mighty Soviet Union began to fall apart? Grandpa Lenin, a German spy and a mad syphilitic? Is Stalin an executioner and murderer? There is nothing to eat, and in American comedies everyone throws food at each other? We are in) I (ope, Guard !!! ...
7Rain7
1. I stared into her eyes all the way through the video, honestly. She has a slight squint.
2. I looked into her "soul" on the second viewing.
3. By the way, she herself constantly looks there (at the very junction of two spheres of influence, if you understand).
Wing42
It is customary to count
Do not care at the beginning "it is customary to count" (who counted, who counted?), The idea itself is correct, so plus one.
faith in news on the internet more faith in news in other media
Perhaps. Because the commissars (Judas) look like "ordinary" people, and since there is such an effect that when a neighbor (colleague) Uncle Vanya personally says something to you, then this "something" is perceived more strongly than what the "talking head" said from TV ",
On the other hand, the development of "neuro-linguistic programming of personality" (zombie) has achieved very noticeable success - people who constantly watch TV, as a rule, approve of any garbage from the authorities, whether it is voting in elections, whether it is an assessment of any events (for example, the zombie man said " Damn it, it's great that ours were bombed in Syria "- and the hamsters watching TV with the joy of idiots will try to talk about it all the next day, and if their interlocutor is the same hamster, then they will have" complete happiness "from repeating to each other what they were told zombie box).
Wing42
By the way, she herself constantly looks there (at the very junction of two spheres of influence, if you understand).
As if hinting - look at them, aren't they beautiful))) Although, of course, I think that there is too much silicone there.
sundyray
I think she herself knows about it.