Graphics Card Not Loading 100% (Battlefield 2042)

Absolutely the same problem, I have an i5 10600 and an RTX 3070. Apparently the optimization is bad. In the menu, the map is 100% loaded

Farzik
Buy percent more powerful or play 4k with rays)

Listoman This is
clearly not the problem.

I have one after the first patch in the menu, the FPS began to fall to 10?

Crappy optimization, a more powerful percentage will correct the situation a little, but the video card will still drop, albeit not by 65 percent, but 80-99 will jump

Smokyfox
In this, 128 bodies require a multi-core modern percent, specifically for 3070 in fhd on ultras you need something of the 3800x / 9600k level, but still there will be an underload of the card in places, ideally 5600x / 10600k, naturally, overclocked and with normal memory)

I don't play Listoman in 1080, but 3440x1440. And I looked at YouTube, with R5 3600 and even worse video cards, in 2k their vidyuha is loaded 90% +

Farzik
Look, 3070 in fhd on ultras is capable of producing 110 fps, 3600x 90 fps, that is, in this case, the card will be underloaded. 3070 at 3440 * 1440p at ultras is capable of producing 65 fps, and the percentage is unchanged 90 fps, therefore, in this case, the card will already be fully loaded. If you play at 3440 * 1440p and some medium settings, then 3070 is again capable of producing 110 fps, but the percentage remains at around 90 fps, so again you get an underload of the card. The numbers are conditional, the main point is)

Listoman
and why then my percentage is not loaded at 100?)) It is not even at 70 as I wrote earlier, but almost more often 60-64%, rarely jumps to 70. And other people with the same processor as mine, and even with 3060 more frames, and their vidyuha is 90% + loaded. What is wrong with my R5 3600, while others with R5 3600 have all the rules?)
For example, his
Spoilercard is even worse than mine, the percentage is the same, and about 70 frames. or here it is,
Spoiler is also worse than my card, also about 60 fps. (I set the 2k resolution as they did, instead of 3440_1440 to the light bulb) Why does their processor take out, but mine does not?) What do they have, that I have it loaded up to 70%, but their card loads 90 percent, I have 50 60

Farzik
It is necessary to look at the downloads of separate streams. If high loads slip on some threads, you can assume that you already have an emphasis in percent or there is not enough memory speed (if there is not enough data from memory, threads can also draw a high load, although in fact they will be idle). And you don't have to look at the total processor load at all, this is a random figure that does not say anything.
Percent can draw a total load of 15%, but in fact it will have 1 thread loaded at 90-100, and the rest at 0-10. And this will also be an emphasis in percent.
Therefore, turn on monitoring of all threads, and you can remove the general CPU load altogether, it is useless.

Listoman
I personally have an i7 8700 / rtx 3070 1440p ultra without dlss, 80+ fps, but again the card is loaded in the range of 75-90%, I turn on dlss, fps does not change, but the card load drops to 55-60%, turning on rtx is even more drops the card to 50% and the fps falls accordingly. I'm shocked. Okay, I would understand my percentage of garbage. But the sidekick has the same 3070 card and the same resolution and at the same time the percentage of i9 10900k in overclocking, ram ddr4 3600 cl15, and the situation is only slightly better than mine, ultra, without dlss and rtx, map load in battle 85-90 %, with the inclusion of dlss, the card load drops to 75% fps without changes, and if it also includes rtx, then in general, like my card, it drops to 60-65%. Let me remind you of this with the i9 10900k.

Listoman
Can't even i9 10900k (OS 5.1ghz), at 1440p, be able to fully load 3070 in this game. I don’t believe it, and even if this is so, then what percentage is needed to fully load the map in this game !? Especially if people have a 240Hz fullhd monitor and a 3080 level card))) there is probably no such thing yet

AndreyKOT3 wrote:
turning on rtx drops the card even more up to 50% and the fps falls accordingly.
I can only tell you that the included RTX increases the load on the processor as well. You can draw conclusions yourself. Although in a game with such optimization it is hardly possible to draw any conclusions, but so, just infa for thinking for the future.

Space Marine
Yes, and if you set the resolution to 4k, then voila, the map is 99%, and sometimes it sinks up to 80%. But there is no point from 4k resolution on a 2k monitor. 4K DSR looks even worse than native 2K

The same cyberbook, map load 99% with drawdowns up to 95%. And as for me graphene and tracing effects there later

Farzik
Dlss turn off and rth

Farzik
Loading in% of your processor does not mean anything, it can work at 20%, but suffer from information starvation, waiting for new information from the RAM to arrive)
They may have better tuned memory, and a weaker card, naturally, will load more when same resolution / graphics settings)

AndreyKOT3
The described situation clearly speaks of swotting in percent, games do not care about GHz, they need fast memory, and 3600cl15 - an average level)
From the 3070, something of the 3800x / 9600k level is enough, but 3080ti / 3090 can almost always be loaded at 1080 / 1440p only 12900k)

AndreyKOT3 wrote:
yes, and rth, by and large, it is mainly the load on the card.
More or not more, but RTX also gives an additional load on the percent. And if before that you had an emphasis in percent with a memory subsystem, then with PTX turned on this emphasis can become even more pronounced, accordingly the load on the card will decrease.
AndreyKOT3 wrote:
And if you set the resolution to 4k, then voila, the map is 99%.
This is logical. It would be strange if this did not happen, because as the render resolution increases, the focus shifts to the video card.
And what is there to discuss, the game is not optimized, where it rests, only the developers know, and that is not a fact. I think anyone who has seen graphene and map filling in 2042 understands that the game's performance is not all right.
Shroud at 5950x and 3090 runs at 70-120 fps in 2k on medium graphics settings.

Farzik
There, at the type on 3060, the card underload goes to 2k and it obviously has not 90 frames, but constant 50-70, if in 2k such numbers, then everything is not so bad at 3070. If you want to increase the FPS on your system, look towards memory, AMD is finicky in this regard, and you will hardly ever see the loading of your processor in games by 99% in view of the platform's features. But this is all lyrics, and all the manipulations with the upgrade will increase the fps max by another 10 frames). Wait for patches, the game came out raw, which is now the norm, take GTA take it, the same problem, during the rain FPS can drop to zero)