Cruel world ->

If we talk about cynicism, then the cruel world will teach to value spiritual and material values. Now, in an age of abundance, people have become more cynical, and they have ceased to appreciate much. People began to value material values ​​less, examples:

- The phone is broken, I'll go buy a new one.
- Before, to buy a car, people earned for a car and saved up for a long time. And when they bought they took care of it. And now that everyone has money ... They buy on credit, and then change in two years. Yes, and they do not care very much, although how to say - people are different.
- The product on the shelves in the stores may not be worth what they ask for.
And much more.

Now about spiritual values, examples:
- Love for the sake of money. Why look for someone who will love, it's easier to find someone with a wallet. For a lot of money is happiness. Although not all people are like that.
- People have ceased to be grateful. As the saying goes: `` Help a hundred times will be forgotten, once refused - they will remember. ''

The store has everything, but there is money. And the rich have nothing to do with them.
Politics is far from ideal. Now there are a lot of politicians out there, but they did at least something good !? Not all of them, of course, but at least they did something. Yet many problems remain to be addressed. The other part of politicians does not do anything at all, but only steal money and the state budget. Corruption, road problems, social policy and economics are the main problems.

Alas, the store does not have everything, and what is there is not always useful. Food, for example. Medications. You buy and you are not sure how much chemistry there is, but if you look without chemistry, you won't have enough money or you just won't find it.
Electronics: prices are too high, the cost of many things is several times less. Especially phones and new computers and TVs ...

A.Soldier of Light
Looks like Nietzsche) I don't agree with him, by the way.
Friedrich Wilhelmovich is a great storyteller. He did not take into account the biological needs of a person for dominance and proposed to turn off the restraining mechanism (traditional morality) and replace it with "the morality of the masters." In this case, every second person will feel like a "superhuman" (if the CSV is not lower than the plinth, of course) and will try to defend their interests by all means (morality is turned off). And all this will lead to complete chaos.

Gauguin
And all this will lead to utter chaos.

And why ?

He did not take into account the biological needs of a person for dominance
Not everyone is sick with this ...

EX0800_
Not everyone is sick with this ...
Everyone. The types of dominance are different - status, intelligence, strength, power, etc. This is especially pronounced when someone nearby begins to "show off".
And why ?
I told you - without morality, all means are good. Striving for dominance (in extreme cases, self-defense) + lack of a deterrent = disorder and war.

Gauguin
Everything. The types of dominance are different - status, intelligence, strength, power, etc. This is especially pronounced when someone nearby begins to "show off".

But after all, there are exceptions, if for example I have nothing to dominate or somehow stand out, then I am this exception or not?

EX0800_
"if, for example, I have nothing to dominate with or somehow stand out, then am I an exception or not?"
Leading positions are disproportionately fewer than those of ordinary performers. So, buddy, in this example you are by no means an exception. Just take your place in the orderly ranks of the clockwork men.

Gauguin, the constraining mechanism can be awareness of moral values. This is if we talk about a super person for whom there are no dogmas.
Like trying to find your way in a maze. Whatever it is, but there is only one way out. So it is in trying to survive. More opportunities when there are more of their own kind in quantities. It looks like it has always been like this =)

I often remember my brother's words "be people!" it's really like we are all different races. I can imagine what will happen if the aliens arrive at all, no attempt to understand at once, the majority will declare war and we will all be killed. So on the topic I would like to change people so that they are more penetrating to each other, do not pass by when someone is bad, especially a child

EX0800_
this world is terrible and there is little beauty here and I have a question why people do not want to change it

The problem is that some of them have dofiga, so dofiga
that they can't spend it in three lives.
Others have nicherta, so a little balance is needed.
I am not saying to take from the rich and give to the poor.
But these billionaires should donate some small percentage to the state.
Let schools build and universities instead of buying football clubs.
Or they will stir up charity.

A rational person does not need morality. Well, for all sorts of restraining factors there. Enough and just think well before you mess up. And for fools there is morality, religion and other similar institutions. And by the way, morality does not always work to ensure that stupid individuals do not harm others. For example, the genocide of homosexuals is based solely on moral criteria. No clear reasons for such actions are given.

RussianQuaker An
intelligent person has morality in his heart. Only the bastard has no morality, due to the fact that he is genetically flawed - he is not able to think rationally, that is, he is not able to build chains of cause and effect when thinking.

A reasonable person does not need morality

I liberate you from the chimera called conscience ...

Genetically flawed individuals will all the time refer to events more than 50 years ago.
Well, we have some ideal supermen here and they don't need morality.
Do not kill
Do not steal ...

RussianQuaker
You already decide: either does not have morality, or does not know how to think rationally.
Any ideas about good and evil, based at least on religious commandments, at least on cultural traditions, at least on logic, this is by definition morality. Another thing is that there are different moral systems, in varying degrees adequate to the realities, in varying degrees of justification. The study of these issues is the science of ethics.

Krokodil Da
Well, we have some ideal supermen here and they don't need morality.
Do not kill
Do not steal ...

Do not steal Do not kill just because of some constraining factors? Congratulations, some people do not need this at all. Well, punishing the enemy is of course not counting :)

V-Nine
Any ideas about good and evil, based at least on religious commandments, at least on cultural traditions, at least on logic, this is by definition morality.

There is no evil in nature, what are you talking about at all.

RussianQuaker
There is no evil in nature, what are you talking about at all.
Not in nature, but people have. Evil = deliberately causing harm, pain, suffering, any negative consequences.

Don't you steal, don't you kill just because of some kind of deterrent? Congratulations, some people do not need this at all.
Lack of need is also a deterrent.

V-Nine
Lack of need is also a deterrent.

As if to kill and rob is the norm.

To this topic: