Impression about dls No step back. (Hearts of Iron 4)

Gentlemen, how do you like the new DLS No step back?
In general, I have more negative things. Especially how they worked in Russia, which, in principle, should be the very first, well-developed not only in historical tricks, but also in alternative ones. And as a result, we have Stalin's paranoid, and even very tough debuffs and nibbling of non-communist ways, all the more so in general such nonsense in sequence. Namely:
1) What the hell is Vladimir becoming the emperor of Russia, when, in reality, his overwhelming majority of monarchists did not support the claim to the throne. And why can he restore the alliance between Great Britain and France, when his father was in the German-Russian society Aufbau (revival). And the Kirillovichs themselves were more pro-German.
2) Semyonov and Shkuro, what f * ga these two are fighting together with other whites, when almost all the white movement hated them. And in general, the Whites are very tight with the generals, although in Europe then there were a lot of White émigré organizations from where they could get them.
3) The focus associated with the inclination and transfer of Japan to Vladivostok and Northern Sakhalin is another nonsense.
4) Why can't Russia integrate its former imperial possessions of the Baltic states, Poland, Finland and southern Sakhalin? Generally incomprehensible. Plus why the commies have a more elaborate branch of foreign policy, while Russia does not. But some kind of Poland with the Baltics can do tricks and viola. ways to integrate territories they never owned.
This is all in brief, although you can still find fault with a lot. Of course, if you take the tricks of other states, then yes, in principle, they did a good job, but it is offensive that the state, which played one of the key roles in World War II and the trader focused on it first of all, but has such a weak study, unlike the rest.