War vs. Death (Darksiders 2)
We are discussing the two horsemen of the Apocalypse. Characters, abilities, appearance and everything else. Which one do you like more.
PS You can learn more about the nature of Death from the office. comic book.
Mp.Mopuaptu
I agree =) No more than a name for what people themselves will do to the land, although according to the logic of things, the War should be the first, further the use of chemical or biological weapons (Plague, Pestilence), further catastrophic shortage of food (Hunger), and at the end Death. Nothing more than a name, the more it is not said who they finally are, messengers of heaven or the fiend of Hell)) In short, we ourselves will bring the end of the world without angels and without demons!
Ragna - the Bloodedge
Come on, all the tough guys wear hoods =)) Take Assasins Creed or Prototype first part, and Death is also in the form of a Reaper, in a cassock with a hood.
It's just that the Horseman is the personification of some terrible misfortune / catastrophe that comes from a person as such.
War, of course. His image, his behavior, his style is the image of an epic hero. And Death raises more skeptical questions than epic-respect) :)
Mp.Mopuaptu
Yes there and it is written that he was given the power to kill with the sword, hunger, pestilence and earthly beasts, well, according to Revelation, the game goes on as usual =) In the game, they were simply turned into Nephilim, and as if they were material =)
According to the idea, they should be immortal and sterile, if so.
are sterile?)) that is, do you think they also multiply?)))
XD
I like War better. A very strong character with a strong character. War - and that says it all.
I like the War more in terms of colors =)
Even from the first arts of the future (i.e., the current - second) part, it seemed to me that they tried more over the appearance of the War.
Although all riders among themselves and by design are fundamentally different personalities. So we will assume that they cannot like everyone at the same time =)
Although Death finally has one of my favorite types of weapons - double, in both hands.
I like "Death" more, it is more dexterous, charismatic, sometimes makes caustic comments with jokes. And war is a stupid "TANK". (IMHO)
snake12234
Well, no one reproaches you, but the characters are different, but there are brothers, if one is a joker, the other must be serious =)
Both are good.
War has excellent magic and Chaotic form is not penetrable, death's magic is weaker, but more, but the form is a class, but it receives damage.
But Death has a super weapon scythe, with nothing to compare two in one, cool like the Jedi.
I like both.
War, it seems to be so simple - in the sense of ingenuous - honest, the code of a warrior, etc. In short, like a hero or a knight. Only if if he is deceived and he finds out about it, then wait for high-grade n ***** in on your head. And the collapse of their cunning plans. And he is not so merciful as the heroes.
Death, although it can also bestow no less high-grade n ******, is the complete opposite of War. A kind of ninja - at first he will consider the situation this way and that and vice versa, and then decide how to act.
And, for me, they complement each other well.
I think Death is cooler than War.
1. Death has two scythes of metal, and war has a "Shadow" scythe.
2. Death is better at acrobatics.
3. Death has a cool chaotic shape. (War is a little dumb, well, some kind of dragon or what is it)
I remember the fact that I played darksiders, but I don’t remember the war itself, although I liked the first part, in general, it’s somehow ordinary or something. As for part 2, right now I'm going through it, and in what form the 2 rider is presented, it's just laughter, it feels like I'm not playing for death, but for a monkey performing primitive assignments, let's see what happens to the 3 rider, but for now this couple is absolutely not impressed.