Point Blank vs Counter-Strike (Point Blank)
I propose to start this topic because PointBlank is very similar to the source. We vote which is better.PointBlank - 17 Counter-Strike - 3
Pointt Blank is still better. and the graph, and the game system itself. I do not have PPC slow, but it is generally unrealistic to play on KC. And in the point form, not everything depends on the ping. And you can still pump the Persian)))
of these two well, probably already PB
Although the good old CS can not be replaced by anything.
Here is the best game:
http://www.playground.ru/redirect/rf-cheats.ru/forum/
Come in, play and chat on the forum.
point blank shit, played for an hour 2, got tired of it quickly
In theory, I could not get bored if I burst into CS with tactics and you were thrown into it, you better say so, and to try all the cards and techniques on them with different weapons in PB you need like a year of play. Since pumping matters.
CS has excellent shooting physics, and PB dynamics and fun, but the infection sometimes gets boring to swing
pb is better, only for a new weapon for two weeks it is necessary to zadrot [url = http: //smajliki.ru/smilie-306994311.html] [img] http://s2.rimg.info/ff42c5514b789c6367d3e04fead099b8.gif [/ img] [/ url]
pb definitely +1000
+
1) more guns
2) there is a donut and skins are different (pleasing to the eye)
3) ranks and pumping
4) cards like meat, meat on fractions, meat on snipes, podromyas, meat-cutting, survival and defense
5) you can bend noobs))
-
1) hedgehogs are much cooler than hedgehogs))
2) minus in donate, again, because of hedgehogs or very rich