Optimization (Battlefield V)
There is a system intel core i5 3330 3 ghz 12 RAM GTX 1060 6 gb. faced with the problem, played on ultra, the fps was from 30 to 60, was uncomfortable to play, lowered the settings to medium, the picture has not changed, put at least the same, what could be the reason? The plane is disabled, and its inclusion does not affect the process. I do not believe that processor even at the minimum salary do not pull it. After the first flew bf on ultra at 80 fps consistently in practice. The conversation was about the single player mode of BF 1. And the question is, why the change of settings does not raise fps and does not provide stability?Steve Taller
All there will be enough of a friend to 4.5 Hz are scarce and flies. Loaded? Well, Yes it is a BF cartoon, even 4 at 70-80 percent. Settings all ultra except mesh and postoperati environments
Steve Taller
Average fps 105-110 min, 85-75. The screenshots turned out so well in terms of fps. And in terms of the percent no, he is not always at 100процентов and in stock right now. So I'm on 4.7
Great optimize, played purely for the sake of raytracing. Core i9-9900K+RTX 2080, about 70 FPS in FHD.
Without DXR, framerate above 120 FPS.
warp 37
Why the heck are you doing on the floor-screen indicators of MSI AB? There may be all compactly doobjednat to be in my videos at the top of all infa. Visually, what with the rays without the difference is almost invisible
warp 37
Even in single player, if I do not say that sacudo included that I would not notice))
h00weh
need to test in processorsamsung games, the same Assassin last, in the same 5 battles etc.
Steve Taller
Yes, it is clear that it will be better than 4 and 8 generation, how would you compare 4 cores and 6 I think as it is not correct , you just said that the brakes and all that but they are not present, and from 12-15 fps to assemble a new system as it is delusional. Yes, and look better in live but not these stripes in fact, there's such a difference for a couple of seconds and so in fact one and the indicator.
in short the game needs! optimize a little better than the last part in terms of better use of CPU and uniform loading of the cores, but the video card requirements are a bit higher, however, and the graphics have improved, and textures are pulled. However, in 4K my card can't cope but... it's as if middling, although 1080p and 1440p I think as long as her everywhere, and the following year her play will be possible, and by 2020 there NVIDIA will probably release something like 3080ти, then change it together with the platform at the same time, the percent-then I, too, already 5-th year went
Do the requirements of the GPU has increased pretty decently compared to the previous part.
Spoiler
Here most of the settings on ultra.
But in bf 5, the situation is much more dire.
Spoiler
There are even two settings had to be lowered to average values.
The developers give us to understand that long on the same hardware to sit will fail.
Six months later, have to completely change your PC.
warp 37 wrote:
Great optimize, played purely for the sake of raytracing. Core i9-9900K+RTX 2080, about 70 FPS in FHD.
You would those rays still turned on at 4k resolution) video card would definitely kick in as a result of this slide show), These rays can be included if the minimum system is two 2080ti to enjoy a comfortable fps at high resolutions
Steve Taller wrote:
However, in 4K my card can't cope
For full hd and 2k your card will last for a long time, a year or two for sure. But percent your corny outdated. Better take the same i9-9700k. More profitable compared to the i7-5960x. For example, I took the i7-8700k. The cooler on it put not some super expensive for 2000-3000 rubles or unnecessary dropsy, and the usual floor tower for 700 RUB and dispersed the stone up to 4800 Hertz. Thus, the temperature maximum was 73С. I think this is the perfect result)
Optimization is excellent! This is very pleased me)+
Do not say, but the game was worth it! Passed immediately. The ending of the game!)