What is your processor capable of?
The main characteristics of the processor and performance indicators in various applications.Core I3 3220T 4 threads, 2 cores, 2.8 GHz
GTA V - 50 fps (when the car sags up to 20)
NFS most wanted 2012 - 50-60 fps
Minecraft 59-68 fps
GTA IV - 60 FPS
in the main load in all games from 50 to 80%
R 7 5700 U 8 cores 16 threads, max frequency 4.3GHz.
TDU 2 open world game performance example.
Spoiler
If you look at the clear sky, then it will be a real CPU fps? Unless, of course, VK is powerful.
sevapva
Ryzen 7 5800x gta 5 60 fps, cyberpunk 50-60 fps on medium-high, rests on video card gtx1060 6gb
CryteK
I bought it because of the presence of 40 pci-e lines. Games are not my number one priority. so far everything is OK.🤣🤣🤣
Denis Kyokushin
is not that. The percent is tested without focusing on the card. It is tested with a resolution of 800x600.
01001000 01101001
That's right, that's right. But still, in our time, when testing a percentage, you can stop at the people's full hd resolution, and not at 640x480 or 800x600. The main thing is not to go higher than full hd. But I'm not talking about that now. I want to say that when testing a processor, in no case should you set some settings to the very minimum, because some of them can load the processor very heavily, especially if they are on ultra. Here is an example of the Legion Dogs. I show in the video and try to eliminate the influence of congestion on the card at the same time, so that the load on the percent is maximum. And then from time immemorial, we have taken it as a fashion to lower all settings to the very minimum, not realizing that there are those parameters that, when these settings are raised, will load percents, and if they are lowered to the very minimum, they will exclude this possibility, which is erroneous test for percent. Legion is a great example
MOUSE lapwing
I don't need to throw videos, I won't watch them - they are not interesting and not informative.
Otherwise, I agree with the correction. There are processor-dependent graphics settings - draw distance, grass, trees, number of NPCs, geometry, etc. here yes. But he has RX588. What's the point? There you need to combine - permission + settings, this will be true. And you, of course, with such a card you can show off with FullHD. The main thing is that there is no focus on the map and that there is someone and what to compare with, the same settings as the others. In the meantime, it turns out that random videos and games.
I will say more, the topic is generally empty, as with video cards. You, yes, the author communicates (and well, someone else will fly up). It went, it went, it went. It is not clear to whom all this is written and done.
01001000 01101001
He does not have RX 588, but 3080 and 4930k percent. We find out how many modern games can take resources from the CPU.
i7 4790K, does it make sense to take 3060 or 3060Ti for such a process? Play clean on a 2010 office monitor at 1080p or less.
MOSHIVURIA lapwing
Re-read. I wrote a message to Denis:
01001000 01101001 wrote:
not that. The percent is tested without focusing on the card. It is tested with a resolution of 800x600.
I'm talking about him. There was no talk about the author, we are leading this chain? Or you switched, or generally noted. Okay, then what should Denchik do? FullHD and processor-dependent settings to twist. He will run into a card for anyone.
Podvipodvertov
Podvipodvertov wrote:
i7 4790K, does it make sense to take 3060 or 3060Ti for such a process? Play clean on a 2010 office monitor at 1080p or less.
IT MAKES SENSE! The video card is always taken to the maximum. But you can even switch through DSR. But taking into account the fact that graphonium is now loading heavily, the percentage will of course be handed over somewhere, but everything is clear with it (it makes no sense to change it in any case and it makes no sense to get hung up on it) - the motherboard, processor, RAM must be changed, at least map will be fine. I'm always for the card. Yes, anyone will tell you so - complete the PC to the maximum. There is no "disclosure" in nature either. The question is only in the number of rendered frames. Leave the percent - if it suits, replace it if it seems a little.
And of course take the 3060Ti, no less. As it were, there are dreamers and strategists regarding 4000 already. See if you can wait for it. 3060 is not worth taking, it's like some kind of stub. And change the monitor, 2022, where 2.5k or 2560x1440 is a normal monitor in 2022.