Changed GTX 1650 D6 OC 4G to RX6500 XT
serflyWell, 6500 xt is not far from 1650, that is, it is at the level of 1650 super! here is the test 6500xt pci e 4.0 vs 1650 super pci e 3.0, and so they go on a par, where one is ahead of another! and you just have pci e 3.0 and with 8x lines you lose about 10-15% of performance, if the video card was with 16x 3.0 then you would not lose performance, in short by 6500xt with 8x pci e 4.0 lines, the performance would be a little better than 8x 3.0.
Kartonkratos wrote:
and you just have pci e 3.0 and with 8x lines you lose about 10-15% of performance,
Now X-Ray will come running!) Better delete the text))))
Guys!, the essence of the problem -What to do? Take another mother with a stone? Or demolish all old nVIDEA drivers? I don’t know how, it’s easier to demolish the operating system. Or return (under warranty) the card?
serfly
If there is money, then, of course, it is better to take a new mother and percent. Well, and there already at the same time and the OS will have to be rearranged.
So money is the problem! Can she lower the stock frequency. for the tire to do well? I'm a total sucker at this. Barely figured out the "green" setting, now "red" for the first time! Maybe somewhere to fasten something, and run? For frigidity and silence, I fell in love with her immediately ...
serfly
serfly wrote:
Stone DualCore Intel Core i3-7100, 3900 MHz (39 x 100)
Well guys, komon! Are you kidding me? 2 cores.
serfly wrote:
MSI H110M Pro-VD Plus
They googled about the mutant on these boards, as well as flashing under the 8000 series intel. Get i7 8700 ES on Alibaba
serfly wrote:
Today I bought an AMD Sapphire Radeon RX 6500 XT 4 GB
card via Ozon And you can return the card, I don’t know the subtleties of ozone, but they should have the same order. And take what will work without question on 3.0 PCI-e.
serfly wrote:
HDD ST500DM002-1BD142 500.1 GB disk drive
Here is the same problem. Check the game on the SSD. Also check out other games. Anything happens.
serfly wrote:
Or demolish all old nVIDEA drivers?
The driver had to be demolished through DDU, so that without traces and conflicts.
In general, write a video, with afterburner indicators, in order to understand what is wrong with the numbers and the time frame of the frame. What does your problem look like? This may well be given out by vidyuhi firewood, try another version.
I'm generally confused by your processor. How do you export on two cores? Start with him and load, he is already hammering at 100 in any case. And he can easily be the cause.
I remembered, a coffee machine, they are stitching.
Spoiler 
You can consider options GIGABYTE B660M GAMING DDR4 + 12100f i3- will be released at a price of 16000. Moreover, you will have PCI-e 4.0 and a new computer. Leave your memory for now.
But first, I would like to make sure and find the root cause, and I strongly doubt that this is PCI-e X8.
serfly
This card must be used only with a CPU that supports PCI express 4.0, and hence SAM(RB). Your percent clearly does not have time to prepare personnel for the GPU, it was necessary to stay at 1650. And so only change the processor and MP.
It's already really better to look and save up for new hardware with 4.0. Either 12100F + B660M (16K) or 5600X + B550M (20K). i3 and H110 investing in junk is no longer appropriate. Prots sad.
Max P wrote:
Your CPU obviously doesn't have time to prepare frames for the GPU
And it's multiple times more powerful than 1650.
Max P
I've already rethought, now find 8700 (ES) for adequate pennies. It would cost 3-4 thousand. Try at least as a plug 8400 / 9400 to see. Well, really, 8-10 for this percentage, add another 6 thousand and there will be a system at 12100F.
01001000 01101001 6500XT is
much more powerful, but the 8700 ES should work just fine without changing the board.
And how to achieve this? I just tested the card a little, I didn’t twist / change anything in the settings. Maybe you have a hint? I'm a complete fool...
serfly
serfly wrote:
How to achieve this? I just tested the card a little, I didn’t twist / change anything in the settings. Maybe you have a hint?
There is a firmware - a coffee mod, you need to look at overclockers, forget it "Modification of motherboards 100/200 to support Coffee Lake 8xxx/9xxx processors", otherwise the links are deleted here.
but if you mess around. But I noted above that such investments are extremely doubtful. 16 thousand 12100F + B660M. And how much will 8700 ES cost on Ali even, 8-10 thousand. Also look for 8400 / 9400 to plug in, you need minimal spending, because this is very stupid. Also, remember the loss on PCI-e 3.0, all the more so how stupid it is to spend money.
Have you already checked everything? At least limit the FPS to the old map. Although these 2 cores must be changed in any case, this is extremely sad in 2022. I would say PAIN.
Spoiler Have you checked everything yet? At least limit the FPS to the old map. Although these 2 cores must be changed in any case, this is extremely sad in 2022. I would say PAIN. Although I will switch to gambling anyway. I found an article https://fraza.com/news/312850-kak-vybrat-onlajn-kazino-i-ne-oshibitsja how to choose an online casino and not make a mistake? I hope everything works out!
It's true. I bought myself a super in 2019 2060 and I’m very glad that I had time before the price increase!
serfly
All the same, in 6500 xt there are not even 8x pci e lines, but 4x! then it’s clear that it works so badly, and even with such a weak processor that it just can’t load it, and at the same time it limits it very much in memory bandwidth, so to speak, even if I bought a 6700xt in which 16x pci e, it would not be noticeable performance loss when using 3.0, but of course we don’t get it! and at least i7 8700 or 9700, which also only support 3.0.
benson2000
He did not have 1060, but 1650! which is weaker just the same than 1060! and yes, you can change it, so to speak, an awl for soap, well, of course, 6500 xt will be a little more powerful, but everything would be better if I took 1650 super and there would not be any hemorrhoids!
benson2000
serfly wrote:
BUT after the GTX 1650 D6 OC 4G, the new one is more sluggish Where
. 6500 is more powerful than 1650.
Kartonkratos wrote:
All the same, in 6500 xt there are not even 8x pci e lines, but 4x!
What will you do! What's again?
Head spin. In short, I completely demolished the nVIDEA drivers, rebooted the system, downloaded Cyberpunk 2077 for a test, I didn’t even try it before. Launched in high graphics settings, poshastal about 15 minutes from the very beginning. There are no obvious drawdowns. The graph is beautiful. But on the old map, I did not use such costly games, there is nothing to compare with. A percent in 4 threads (2 cores) is loaded by 70-80 percent. 3912MHz without boost. So I think that the zepeny drivers interfered, and, most importantly, the lack of a 4.0 bus
01001000 01101001
What is it? I wrote that with so many lines, it will lose some of the performance!
Kartonkratos
I don't say or argue. I completely agree.
serfly
serfly wrote:
There are no obvious drawdowns.
Well, you will enter the city, and the percent will pump. And so, it's good that it was decided. What resolution are you playing at? By the way, even 70% of the load is already an overload of the processor. Even so, it's amazing.