Rx 6600xt pulse not pulling furmark
Decided to test my vidyuhi in furmark in fullhdIt was avg 160 fps temperature less than 70 degrees and hot spot 76max
Launched fullhd 8xmsaa and avg 19 fps. Although it should be around 58 avg fps.
With what can be connected?
dispresant
dispresant wrote:
...What could be the reason?
See if the map is loaded to full (up to 99 -100%) and what temperatures. It would be nice to record at least a minute test with monitoring, upload the video to YouTube and link here.
Example: If you need a temperature test, it is advisable to drive for 10 minutes - in the time settings (60000 ms) add one more 0 at the end.
dispresant dispresant
wrote:
I'll throw it off in 2 - 3 hours
And it would be nice to have screenshots of the program settings.
dispresant
Try as I have on the screenshots - enable full screen mode in your resolution and the same settings, then repeat. GPU-Z does not need to be dragged over the screen - if it is installed and running in the tray, FurMark will display its statistics (as in my video). And update the programs to the latest versions (just in case): FurMark 1.32.1.0...
Spoiler https://geeks3d.com/furmark/downloads/
..., and GPU-Z 2.51.0 (in the video, the program itself shows what is newer version).
Spoilerhttps://www.techpowerup.com/download/techpowerup-gpu-z/
Although from what is on the video, it is not surprising - the card is loaded almost to the maximum (99%), which is normal. If the resolution in the program is 2560 * 1440 (3,686,400 pixels) divided by my 1600 * 900 (1,440,000 pixels) - there will be a difference of 2.56 times. Whether your video card (judging by the RX 6600 XT video) can deliver 2.56 times more performance in FurMark than mine (GTX 960) is another question. And I also noticed a strange thing - the program itself consumes ~ 300 MB of video memory (MEM parameter), and the total amount of video memory consumed is more than 1800 MB. Do video recording and other processes "eat" another 1.5 GB?
SonyK_2
6600xt on your settings can produce 150+ fps.
But this is garbage, you have PostFX enabled, it gives a weak load on the card. TS also has Dinamic Background and Burn-in enabled, which are enabled by default in the program, so they specifically impair performance. Try to drive your card on the TSA settings, most likely it will be around 5 fps, maybe 7. In terms of the difference between your cards, somewhere in 2.5-3 times, closer to 3, 6600xt and more powerful in games.
dispresant
I recently sold this card, only msi gaming x. Drove her wherever possible. At 1440p, 8x msaa and with a speaker background + burn-in, just something in the region of 20 fps and gave out. In stock it was around 17-18 fps, in overclocking 19-20. So you're all right.
This card can only produce 160-180 fps in 1080p and with msaa turned off. You have 1440p and 8x msaa in the video.