The optimization of the game
Let people discuss the optimization of toys and like who she is , judging by the tests it leaves much to be desired :)))Optimization is excellent. Goes on ultra on i5 6500 b 1060 video. Monitor 21:9 2560x1080. I love the rollers and inserts with bosses and heroes on ultra wide Monica.
Cheburashka
Here on the rx 580
Spoiler
On 1060
Spoiler
At the start all goes well,and patches to be perfect.
The game is empty, as in previous parts. Although as anyone. There are people who like it! But playing as a cartoonish hand-drawn graphics, this is too much for me)
gliga142
YouTube is full of tests. So expect it and on the stump will go with 60 fps.
Cheburashka wrote:
50 FPS is excellent ? For the shooter at least 80)))
On lowland 1070 you want 80 fps??? Are you serious??? But the graphone is really not in the game, and the resources are going to play normally
Pech 1080, reached with a friend to the second loki, the fact brakes terribly, maybe it's in my process (i5-4460)
GlamDodgeX wrote:
Pech 1080, reached with a friend to the second loki, the fact brakes terribly, maybe it's in my process (i5-4460)
So msi ab to help you, If the percent at least one stream in the weave rests or even more so all, it is clearly a matter, but the percent is really weak even for 1080, maybe you tried to play 4k
Steve Taller
At the top, cheburashka dumped on the i7 2600k, where 1070 is loaded by only 40%
Clearly the CPU is missing.
For ultra requires 16gb of ez, and I have so much. Launched all ultra FHD on the i7 8700k RTX 2080 Ti and phps norms was above 60 exactly, or then 80. In battle from all sorts of effects a little lower, but sometimes there was a drop of fps to 50 with a frieze a little. I didn't run the full tests, I just relied on the phps. I have two options. 1. Rests on memory. 2. Optimization for the greens was not brought, when the game starts there immediately the emblem of amd. Or even two in 1 :)
Spiny wrote:
Launched all ultra FHD on the i7 8700k RTX 2080 Ti and phps norms was above 60 exactly, or then 80.
2080 to 1080r such a low phps? And there was a scaling option? if you're there 2.0 or 200% bet, then consider got 4k
Steve Taller
Now I've run again for 5 minutes. FPS reaches almost 120. About 80-120 phps. The scale is 100% As written above what the phps even 80. I shot the dogs and didn't see the difference. But when the camp was smashed for example, for example, there was a drop of fpps as much as 50 with something fps and at the same time the drop went a little frieze, but then returned. And so 80' fps at 1080p ultra and scale 100% Don't think that RTX should take out all the novelties on the ultras in 200-300 phps)
I have FPS jerks when you start aiming at the zoom. Climbed on reddit and it seems that many have the same problem. By the way, I do not advise to include the voluminous fog on the ultra, because the difference compared to the medium is almost no, and FPS eats terribly
Spiny
Rtx 2080ti in such a cartoon game should 200 fps in 1080p give out. On YouTube 1080ti at 1440p gives out 80 fps, so it is much weaker
Steve Taller
I have 4k 60-50 gives out, and in 2k about 100, in 1080p will probably 200.
Yes. People all think that the RTX 2080 Ti is almost 100 times more powerful than the 1080 Ti. Have you seen the tests at all 1080 Ti and 2080 Ti? The difference is not so straight. The only difference is RTX reflections that also eat resources. There's certainly 2080, but there's such a big difference. But there's a 32-year-old, I've got 16. For the recommended requires 16 GB, that's possible rests. I've got an i9 9700k, I've got an i7 8700k. I have a fps comes to 120 and sometimes there was a drop of 50-60 fps with frieze. In the video, there was about 80 fpps, well, he had an i9 and 32gb of ez. I have an i7 8700k and a 16GB of ose. Stick the 8GB of RTX ass in the tie and it won't pull out at all, it will fall into memory. And you make RTX into some kind of titanium. Who has 1080 or 1080 Ti may not exactly be steaming about RTX, sit on at 1080. I jumped from 780.