Fair PvP tournament may 6-9 (Diablo 2)

RainInTheNight wrote:
either it will be a tournament ladder or nonladder not sostoyavshiysya tournament.
I think it would be better a failed tournament

Of course +, with the exact date can be determined in a week

RainInTheNight
+

Just great news...and the most important that the moderator does not dynamics..finally it happened and we waited

and anyways these tournaments need?

Zitbastard
the excitement of) the fun of pvp.

Zitbastard
face off + earn runes + just a fan

after reset I'm also going to take part in tournaments.

Would not hurt to unsubscribe to all potential participants

In normal activity I and Jay replenish the prize Fund

++ this topic is can say the standards, an adequate response to EPR a certain Mr. RichardSolo (which Nenashev candidate)

+ Where there is to record))

RainInTheNight
+
I for !!!
Tournament type with each other the very fact...
Go draca))
Tell current de cada

Amazon or the EU-corki will be extra prize if they take first or second place with 8 or more participants)

atty took over the tournament, something serious is going on....


PS Glowny question, as they themselves will participate, hmm?

Yes,Yes, I also wonder the place to dinamiks freely, whether he will go with his top ),I will add vex!(if he doesn't go) and add Lo (if he goes)
I'm a part of !

Normal is what?

GE wrote:
If earner will normalnym rules (not fair pvp) - I'm in.
Dober, Dober by far)))

PROBAtw wrote:
Amazon or the EU-corki will be extra prize if they take first or second place with 8 or more participants)
Straight honey to my ears, most likely it is a pity that at this time I'm going to roast meat and fish))

It
GE wrote:
If the tournament will be normalnym rules (not fair pvp) - I'm in.
I'm in. Supposedly take the measurement, make the Bo barb, ENCs give Sorka, get a druid with oakum. + you can passivity all you want, but most importantly, when friends you have moderator fair pvp friend, and in any case he can announce victory. And this is done very easily - disclosed that the enemy lost because of the passive gameplay, he does not prove moderator judge for their own reasons + moderator actions newsprivacy.