One Gtx 1070 in conjunction with percent amd fx8300 ()

Under this map we need at least Core i5.

warp 37
Well, my FH doesn't know about it.

Kahran Ramsus
Well, as a performance? How to load the map in games?

Fx and GTX 1070 - nonsense.

Computer-MAN
From 80 to 99 percent is always less than, obviously not bottlesit. Of course overclocked to 4.4.

Core I5 is not always in the dispersal 1070 one opens, and you here about some FX say..)

And if you take this card 6600K and i5 to properly disperse it?

_Xunder
6600к and without overclocking will pull it,but since 6600К to take the course have to drive up to 4.4-4.6 have

Normal ligament. For 1070 desired frequency percent of 3.5-4.0. And the amd FX 8300 is 3.3 GHz. So a little podrzavati and everything is OK. PERC FX 8300 is almost at the level of the i7 3770K. It is two times cheaper (9K vs 20K). Only he needs a good cooler, heated.
You can read reviews about FX 8300.

Kraicher
Complete nonsense,it makes no sense to even comment why and how,see the tests on overah,hangpu at least(to start).

Suitable processors
Table processorepiemonte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070/1080
Line
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Core i5, Core i7, FX-8000/9000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Core i5 and Core i7

W3aMisterWinner
And what's there to see? I have such a bundle, the Witcher, GTA 5, MGS op, da Inquisition, AV code, anywhere card hammer by 99% with occasional dips to 80% and it is in stock, overclocking without any problems. In betmana that the percent that the card is loaded on 50-60% and podlagivaet when calling the Batmobile %-/.

Kahran Ramsus
Look processorswith cards on YouTube channel(forgot nazivaetsa,but there is a leading housing).So,your fx is not even enough for a 100% disclosure 960-970(gives much lower fps than the same bundle with the i3/i5/i7)

W3aMisterWinner
A powerful argument, listen to what the Bob, and ignore a living example before eyes. Okay if gene says it is. Then straight did not argue.

it is true there a bunch of FX-6100

your fx 8 core merge even at 960 before antelami,and to put this budget shit with a top map 1070 is schizophrenia. By the way, I heard that specifically in games 8 core fx lame for the most part because of the shabby cache

p.s. your fx 8 core was tested at a frequency of 4600мгерц and even at that he was drain

W3aMisterWinner
Schizophrenia is trying to someone to talking about what you don't understand shit. here's a 2-fold increase when moving from 960 to 1070, although the logic of washi/Zheka with a bunch of subscribers, it shouldn't have been. But you still vidosik with the same fps +/-10 on Titan on i3 i5 i7 which is FKH . So EA hi and three letters.

W3aMisterWinner
I'm not saying that this bunch is the best, I mean possible, as I understood that the questioner has in their home that is FX 8300. ))) Of course inalaska a bunch better. I've been sitting on a bunch of Intel - NVIDIA, and don't ever come off. ))

theoretically if you overclock the CPU to 4 GHz stable magic
quite abut FPSA in this map on normal resolutions.
honestly, I don't know which of these cards in single mode it would be impossible to drop below 50-60fps, plus the time it wears away the map.
therefore, the most absurd at first glance bakeries make sense.