Mankind accelerates the evolution of...
We all know that evolution since the dawn of the Solar system never stopped. For many millions of years under the influence of natural environmental factors there are a lot of organisms flora and fauna.Now in some countries started to carry out experiments on the combination of genes of different animals with the human genome.
Whether a person is able to accelerate millions of years of evolution?
How do you feel about the experimental production of a hybrid human?
Maybe soon will be a cat-girl?
Nevoeiro
Nevoeiro wrote:
Cut out all unwanted, the incest did not happen?
First, about to cut another your interpretation of my words without my words irrelevant. In my concept there is no word on a jig.
Second, you, as opposed to my previous source (by the way, I disagree with the man, but not believe his words half-witted nonsense, and his mentally retarded; how so? How did your diagnosis that all of the views with which I disagree, to me is nonsense?) greatly overestimate the amount of useless people will be (approximately, of course) four billion, so the remaining four will probably be able to avoid rampant incest.
Nevoeiro wrote:
What about those children of the intellectuals who as you say are suitable?
Do not anyone could be. You do not understand what selection of property qualification and how does it work? If they can't secure the necessary financial basis for the maintenance of the offspring, then they will not have offspring, what is there to understand?
The real question is, what about inherited wealth, but he goes far beyond the content of my applicable for ideal conditions design.
Nevoeiro wrote:
did the human body evolve?
..... there is resistance to disease...?
Lord, how you love to flaunt your ignorance...And nothing after visiting of America by Europeans, 80 percent of the North American Indians pipelines of European diseases, which the Europeans have been evolutionary formed resistance? You do not understand that the fact that we are alive, obviously suggests that we are evolutionarily developed the ability to resist the most possible diseases?
Nevoeiro wrote:
mental development is higher?
Not, well, you! Now sitting in caves, and serima in your campfire as homo habilis, no mental development.
In General, what you think evolution is - to become stronger, really speaks volumes about your understanding of the process of evolution (spoiler alert: understanding null)
Nevoeiro wrote:
After all, if the person with the intellectual capacity not the will to develop it,he will remain a fool.
He will remain uneducated (like you), fool it will never happen. Smart kids are smart already 4 years(compared to non-smart), despite the lack of apperception.
Nevoeiro wrote:
And if so will develop, he will be the offspring, not the fact that this offspring will be the same intellectual potential as the ancestor.
The fact that the probability is very high. We have intelligence about how the parents, of course, if to us will not be affected by the disease or regressive mutation.
Nevoeiro wrote:
And at the expense of intellect, and take the child of ancient man in this time and train him intellectually, he will not differ from current humans.
Yeah, some will definitely not...
ColonelJason wrote:
First, about to cut another your interpretation of my words without my words irrelevant. In my concept there is no word on a jig.
Second, you, as opposed to my previous source (by the way, I disagree with the man, but not believe his words half-witted nonsense, and his mentally retarded; how so? How did your diagnosis that all of the views with which I disagree, to me is nonsense?) greatly overestimate the amount of useless people will be (approximately, of course) four billion, so the remaining four will probably be able to avoid rampant incest.
Okay ,have I said somewhere that you all straight so, rather insulting.
So where do you send these useless people ?
ColonelJason wrote:
Do not anyone could be. You do not understand what selection of property qualification and how does it work? If they can't secure the necessary financial basis for the maintenance of the offspring, then they will not have offspring, what is there to understand?
The real question is, what about inherited wealth, but he goes far beyond the content of my applicable for ideal conditions design.
I'm not talking about proprietary database, the thing is that get your the offspring is useless.
Or you want to say if they can keep these offspring , then let them remain?
ColonelJason wrote:
Lord, how you love to flaunt your ignorance...And nothing after visiting of America by Europeans, 80 percent of the North American Indians pipelines of European diseases, which the Europeans have been evolutionary formed resistance? You do not understand that the fact that we are alive, obviously suggests that we are evolutionarily developed the ability to resist the most possible diseases?
Aha exactly, and still poke vaccinations.And the Indians drank in the manual.
On the other hand Europeans did not what is not lost?
ColonelJason wrote:
Not, well, you! Now sitting in caves, and serima in your campfire as homo habilis, no mental development.
In General, what you think evolution is - to become stronger, really speaks volumes about your understanding of the process of evolution (spoiler alert: understanding null)
And unless the physical development of a person cannot be evolution.The brain's the same for work consumes energy.
And it's not in the caves, I said take the caveman to the present time and to teach and it will be the same as modern man in mental development.
ColonelJason wrote:
He will remain uneducated (like you), fool it will never happen. Smart kids are smart already 4 years(compared to non-smart), despite the lack of apperception
Smart what, hurry to learn the material ? Will not be developed, and will remain, smart in 4 years.
ColonelJason wrote:
The fact that the probability is very high. We have intelligence about how the parents, of course, if to us will not be affected by the disease or regressive mutation.
Is not predisposition and the environment defines it?
ColonelJason wrote:
Yeah, some will definitely not...
And it is as you wish.
Nevoeiro
Well ,did I said somewhere that you all straight so, rather insulting.
You have very little understanding of human speech: I'm not saying you said that, I'm all in a row. I say that you claimed that if someone's opinion differs from mine, I think it is nonsense.
Well, you see, a person's opinion does not coincide with your opinion or what you read. And ACCORDINGLY it is your stupid nonsense...
So where do you send these useless people ?
You have very little understanding of human speech: I will not suggest anyone to send, the nature of the financial qualification of birth has no relation to the package of anyone anywhere.
the thing that turns your these offspring are useless.
In my opinion it does not work, this is another of your fiction as to the meaning of my words (because their true meaning is always slipping away from you).
Or you want to say if they can keep these offspring , then let them stay?
I want to say that the birth rate must be established a property qualification.
Aha accurately and still poke vaccinations.
Try to understand the difference in the number of diseases, where vaccinations, and the number of existing and existed throughout the history of human pathogens.
And the Indians drank in the manual.
You think so because of the fact that your education was spent a minimum of resources. Otherwise you'd know that a large part of the North American Indians died from disease in the time interval between first contact with Europeans (the first, after Scandinavia) and the beginning of massive colonization and, accordingly, manual sawing.
On the other hand Europeans did not what is not lost?
Lost. Black skin, for example.
Is the physical development of a person cannot be evolution. Evolution cannot be anything but evolution.
And it's not in the caves, I said take the caveman to the present time and to teach and it will be the same as modern man in mental development.
The fact that you said it, does not mean that it is true. For example, you live in a time of absolute access to education, but on education its you closer to a cave man. I.e. modern society any positive effect on your development did not have.
What a clever, faster to learn the material ?
Faster, better, more, more, deeper. High intellect many forms of manifestation.
Isn't predisposition and environment defines it?
That predisposition this is the inheritance of characteristics from parents don't you understand?
Nevoeiro
Oh yeah, classic pegada on the shoutbox 8) Sometimes you see this in our time.
This is what I call a discussion discussion, that is offtopic, showdown and who and how it works. On political talk show this also sometimes occurs (here before about politics was, he took it all, and it was fun)...
Once heard the idea that sides should respect each other, and if one wants to convey the idea to the other, we must first understand how to do it. The contemptuous tone of the feed material does not contribute to its perception of the opponent, briefly and clearly. Hence, there are problems (trolling, conflicts, bans). Then look at how someone presents their idea, and we see the culprit :-]
Nevoeiro wrote:
And at the expense of intellect, and take the child of ancient man in this time and train him intellectually, he will not differ from current humans.
I like this train of thought ) Sorry, we cannot conduct such an experiment to conclusively prove anything. It's about intelligence and human evolution... which seems to be stopped for a long time.
Gauguin wrote:
Flat bourgeois rationality (read - the usefulness, the practicality of maintaining a primitive form of existence) - Yes, probably. But no more. In all other cases, ethics is a criterion of reasonableness.
Ethics is part of morality (ethics is not morality, it's as if the science of morality), but morality is a set of moral attitudes in the community and society. Accordingly, the moral in one society may differ from the morality of another society. Hence, the conclusion that rationality has the edge? Rationality is not universal? I think there is a universal, common sense and logic are also part of the reason.
As for morality, my moral principles, the individual may apply to all intelligent life forms in the Universe and to evaluate their actions in accordance with these installations... the Origins of morality in the individual – from the heart (a variant of the soul as the astral body that sits inside the biological, that is, not the materialistic version of the soul as human consciousness).
ColonelJason
Property qualification not less relative than ustanny, changing ethical requirements andor laws in society makes smart rich or poor, for whatever personality reasons.
ColonelJason
Well, where I submitted that the opinion of all who are you talking to ?
A. Soldier of Light
And this is the most interesting as was stoned Stalker figure but even he didn't act that way).
Yes watered the topic of battles were here , all the current shock will give a head start of 100 shackles forward
) A person makes a complaint to the people and he shows the same behavior for which makes the claim.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
I like this train of thought ) Sorry, we cannot conduct such an experiment to conclusively prove anything. It's about intelligence and human evolution... which seems to be stopped for a long time.
Why not, in the jungles of Africa there is a tribe wild tribe of pygmies. Except that, who will like if they will take the child.
ColonelJason wrote:
I want to say that the birth rate must be established a property qualification.
One child from degenerate as you call them?
As an example, the Muslims give birth to many children not being rich, the reason for this is that some of the children still make their way and thus helping everyone else.
ColonelJason wrote:
In my opinion it does not work, this is another of your fiction as to the meaning of my words (because their true meaning is always slipping away from you).
Well, if slipping, write so would not have escaped.
ColonelJason wrote:
Try to understand the difference in the number of diseases, where vaccinations, and the number of existing and existed throughout the history of human pathogens.
Let's consider the Indians just didn't know about these illnesses and probably would not when do not know.And lived well.
ColonelJason wrote:
You think so because of the fact that your education was spent a minimum of resources. Otherwise you'd know that a large part of the North American Indians died from disease in the time interval between first contact with Europeans (the first, after Scandinavia) and the beginning of massive colonization and, consequently, manual sawing.
AXA direct actual evidence of this is, the majority died from diseases, not a bad justification for genocide, direct of entire tribes.
ColonelJason wrote:
Lost. Black skin, for example
But he was initially black color at all? Supposedly all came from a certain black woman) Theory no more.
ColonelJason wrote:
Evolution cannot be anything but evolution.
Well if so , then in the physical plane man lost his ability and not something acquired.How the brain worked in humans in ancient times, so continues to work and that's the whole evolution.
ColonelJason wrote:
The fact that you said it, does not mean that it is true. For example, you live in a time of absolute access to education, but on education its you closer to a cave man. I.e. modern society any positive effect on your development did not have.
As for you. Having the sort of intelligence you're useless to society.
ColonelJason wrote:
Faster, better, more, more, deeper. High intellect many forms of manifestation.
If it is not spent on other issues and not the fact that it works. New da Vinci no.
ColonelJason wrote:
That predisposition this is the inheritance of characteristics from parents don't you understand?
See, the thing is that not all inherit from the parents of the offspring in this respect. Otherwise, in terms of intelligence would have been roughly super people. But vices so to say more inherit.
Nevoeiro
Nevoeiro wrote:
One child from degenerate as you call them?
Who they?
Nevoeiro wrote:
Well, if slipping, write so would not have escaped.
I do not have the skills of communicating with people with alternative abilities to understand speech. My comments are very direct, specific, and concise I don't know how to make them more clear for you - it's probably impossible. Because (guess?), you have very little understanding of human speech.
Nevoeiro wrote:
Let's consider the Indians just didn't know about these illnesses and probably would not when do not know.
Let's. Comprehended. What? This fact somehow negate the fact that the Indians died from diseases that they brought the Europeans, who are themselves from these diseases do not die in such numbers that suggests that they are evolutionarily acquired immunity to them, and your statement that immunity is not produced evolutionary - ignorant stupidity?
Nevoeiro wrote:
actual direct evidence of this is
Yes, there is - you never know, thanks to his ignorance and reluctance to understand and learn, but they are, in fact.
Nevoeiro wrote:
not a bad justification for genocide
The genocide no one is justified, he recognized, in particular, and the United States.
Nevoeiro wrote:
But he was initially black color at all?
Yes.
Nevoeiro wrote:
Theory no more.
Yeah, looking forward to when you review the content of this theory, arguments in its favor, and pull out meaningful counterarguments.
Nevoeiro wrote:
in physical terms a person lost his power, and which are not acquired
Well, lose we did not lose, but if we talk specifically about Homo sapiens, although during our tenure as hunters gatherers (~200 000 - 10 000 BC) the selection of the level of intelligence yet, probably was, after the transition to food producing economy ( sedentary lifestyle) we are selected, primarily, on the strength of immunity. And with the advent of vaccinations and antibiotics, and this selection criterion eliminated.
Nevoeiro wrote:
As for you. Having the sort of intelligence you're useless to society.
You have very little understanding of human speech (in General all). I never said that you are useless (although is obvious), I said that your assumption that any person, including ancient, modern society will be able to make a normal educated members - is false and you are an illustration of this falsity, because of you our society is to do nothing.
With regards to my value - I pay very good taxes, give other people jobs, so that they may eat and live, and invest significant resources in training and development of your child. So,I'm definitely not a distinguished scientist, who gave the society a significant opening, but my work definitely benefits from economic and demographic processes in our country.
Nevoeiro wrote:
See, the thing is that not all inherit from the parents of the offspring in this respect.
It has so many times in this thread, including me.
Nevoeiro wrote:
Otherwise, in terms of intelligence would have been roughly super people.
No, you just don't understand how evolution works. The fact that people inherit their intelligence from their parents, does not mean that it (intellect) with each generation becomes higher.
Nevoeiro wrote:
Well, where I submitted that the opinion of all who are you talking to ?
Here (apparently the first citation, the information is lost somewhere between the monitor and your nervous Miroshnyk node)
Nevoeiro wrote:
Well, you see, a person's opinion does not coincide with your opinion or what you read. And accordingly it is your stupid nonsense
Or in relation to one person is a corresponding reaction, and against the other not? You the meaning of the word respectively you know?He seems to be.
GIGAVETER
GIGAVETER wrote:
Property qualification not less relative than ustanny, changing ethical requirements andor laws in society makes smart rich or poor, for whatever personality reasons.
Of course. But again (said this earlier, probably not you) that my concept created for some ideal situation. It is assumed postindustrialnaya civilization,civil society, rule of law and rights, all in the framework of modern European probation values. Of course it is not intended that my system will work in medieval Europe, where richer all had those quick shredded cabbage people and all sorts of tricks, betrayals destroyed the feudal competitors.
ColonelJason wrote:
Who they?
People.
ColonelJason wrote:
I do not have the skills of communicating with people with alternative abilities to understand speech. My comments are very direct, specific, and concise I don't know how to make them more clear for you - it's probably impossible. Because (guess?), you have very little understanding of human speech.
What people don't understand you then, and won Hi the same with the alternative understanding is.
ColonelJason wrote:
Yes, there is - you never know, thanks to his ignorance and reluctance to understand and learn, but they are, in fact.
ColonelJason wrote:
When it is determined which of the options to be true,it will be very kind of you to provide proof, and indicate either the results of studies
Be so kind as to proof of a considerable part extinct from diseases.)))
ColonelJason wrote:
Let's. Comprehended. What? This fact somehow negate the fact that the Indians died from diseases that they brought the Europeans, who are themselves from these diseases do not die in such numbers that suggests that they are evolutionarily acquired immunity to them, and your statement that immunity is not produced evolutionary - ignorant stupidity?
I have no where said that immunity is evolutionary not produced, he with the same success it is lost if you do not support his vaccinations, so the evolution of the degradation goes hand in hand.
Not will arrive there the Europeans, the Indians would not get sick. This is the same as your if it were not for the revolution.
ColonelJason wrote:
Yeah, looking forward to when you review the content of this theory, arguments in its favor, and pull out meaningful counterarguments.
Content introduction, it has remained a theory, and one of the versions.
The argument is simply not yet found the DNA of other women with the advent of new methods of research for this theory will be either another confirmation or refutation.
ColonelJason wrote:
Well, lose we did not lose, but if we talk specifically about Homo sapiens, although during our tenure as hunters gatherers (~200 000 - 10 000 BC) the selection of the level of intelligence yet, probably was, after the transition to food producing economy ( sedentary lifestyle) we are selected, primarily, on the strength of immunity. And with the advent of vaccinations and antibiotics, and this selection criterion eliminated.
The level of intelligence or still experience sold not innate and learning?
Is evolutionavenue happens.
ColonelJason wrote:
You have very little understanding of human speech (in General all). I never said that you are useless (although is obvious), I said that your assumption that any person, including ancient, modern society will be able to make a normal educated members - is false and you are an illustration of this falsity, because of you our society is to do nothing.
With regards to my value - I pay very good taxes, give other people jobs, so that they may eat and live, and invest significant resources in training and development of your child. So,I'm definitely not a distinguished scientist, who gave the society a significant opening, but my work definitely benefits from economic and demographic processes in our country.
You said it is false, but just to confirm his words can't. As well as I do because you need to make an experiment in this direction.
One can not be trained, and the 2nd maybe.
About the same I pay taxes, produce goods potreblyaya society.
So what kind of uselessness other people you say do not understand, and what to do with them?
ColonelJason wrote:
It has so many times in this thread, including me.
Well, what do you think? Just for your and so much extra and useless.
ColonelJason wrote:
No, you just don't understand how evolution works. The fact that people inherit their intelligence from their parents, does not mean that it (intellect) with each generation becomes higher.
To understand how does not.The question the thread posed seems clear.
So he just stays at the same level.
Nevoeiro
Nevoeiro wrote:
What people don't understand you then
It's not me you need to ask why you do not understand human speech, I on your medical history not familiar. Ask your parents.
Nevoeiro wrote:
Hi the same with the alternative understanding is.
No, it is not so. We had a misunderstanding about the contextual values of a single term, and after my explanation of the misunderstanding was settled. What people may be misunderstanding completely natural, not natural, when man does not understand what he said to you.
Nevoeiro wrote:
Content introduction, it has remained a theory, and one of the versions.
The argument is simply not yet found the DNA of other women with the advent of new methods of research for this theory will be either another confirmation or refutation.
I don't understand your incoherent ignorant nonsense. Ask someone to edit your outpourings. In General, I understand what you tried to demonstrate your ignorance of scientific concepts of skin color... So, the genes for skin pigmentation (with color. note to you), scientists are well known,and all of our ancestors from Africa were carriers of the genes of black people.
Nevoeiro wrote:the Level of intelligence or still experience sold not innate and learning?
Is evolutionavenue happens.
In General - see answer above - you probably already drunk, so your speech has lost the last vestiges of similarity with human. With regards to devolutionary (God...I had to copy this term, I realized that physically can't reproduce so many mistakes in one word), if that's what you tried to write the word regression, then Yes, it is obvious that this phenomenon among individuals is the case - it would be strange to deny it, talking with you.
Nevoeiro wrote:
About the same I pay taxes, produce goods potreblyaya society.
And in what region you live?As you can see, Kurgan oblast. So let's see...Wow! It seems that Kurgan oblast is on 13th place out of ~70 subsidized regions of Russia. With all due respect, your work is useless and unprofitable. But, still wondering what products you produce.
Nevoeiro wrote:
So what kind of uselessness other people you say do not understand, and what to do with them?
Seriously, how many have you had? OK, let's for the fifth time:what to do with them?To impose a property qualification on fertility.
Nevoeiro wrote:
Well, what do you think? Just for your and so much extra and useless.
I don't know. You can try to impose a property qualification on fertility.
Nevoeiro wrote:
So he just stays at the same level.
If you're talking about intelligence (once again, that your speech lost all coherence and objectivity), in your case it is a fact.
ColonelJason wrote:
Of course. But again (said this earlier, probably not you) that my concept created for some ideal situation. It is assumed postindustrialnaya civilization,civil society, rule of law and rights, all in the framework of modern European probation values. Of course it is not intended that my system will work in medieval Europe, where richer all had those quick shredded cabbage people and all sorts of tricks, betrayals destroyed the feudal competitors.
Just thought to write about the possible idealistic Your views. Short-term idealism is beneficial to the society but long term is always harmful and false when the meaning is placed above human, the existence and development of society have been oppressed and, in General, idealism is destructive. Is it not enough examples - Christianity, Islam, communism? Modern Russia is probably not going to lead, despite her words of the ideologues of wild capitalism they only peterstown in pursuit of other goals.
Anyway the selection but neither mentally nor in the provision are not unambiguous, healthy and genetically predisposed to high intelligence can easily not go through it. Then why?
Should apply to the selection - forced to die, by force, otherwise it will not ensure it is even worse than slavery, cannibalism in the nearly ultimate form. Imagine what rachellovesmoosic the impact this will have on society? The limit of separation and hostility. For the sake of profit, and so it is unfair, often distributed, will be all ruthlessly tear each other for the sake of the continuation of life. Powerful and brutal suppression of the society for the rule of law, dictates against their own life.
Why?
GIGAVETER wrote:
compulsion to death
This, of course, impossible to leave offspring. Which, incidentally, will oppress those who are not allowed, which means the oppression of the society, level of development and activity.
GIGAVETER
GIGAVETER wrote:
Just thought to write about the possible idealistic Your views.
Ideal conditions and idealism, this concept of a completely different categories. Ideal conditions mean that we are leveling at a certain experiment, all factors except those whose influence we are going to explore. If to speak about a thought experiment that has a place for us, the question of abstracting from factors which can be neglected, since they do not have any direct impact on consider a hypothetical situation (either we wish they had).
The same idealism is a philosophical category, which implies the certainty of the thinking subject in the supermaterial existence of some metaphysical entities, and the ontological primacy of these entities relative to the entity material. As you can see, nothing to do no concepts.
However, I absolutely agree with your opinion about the falsity of idealistic concepts.
GIGAVETER wrote:
Should apply to the selection - coercion to the death, force
I don't understand why you call birth control a compulsion to death...
GIGAVETER wrote:
Imagine what rachellovesmoosic the impact this will have on society? The limit of separation and hostility.
In China already a long time since there is a limit on the birth rate (somewhat less radical than proposed by me, but still) Not see there decouplings and hostility. But the hostility of the overpopulated poor countries (or rather - generally the poor) kontengent - face. Look at the first country in the list (sort by count of murders per 100 people):
Спойлерhttps://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Список_стран_по_уровню_умышленных_убийств
GIGAVETER wrote:
Why?
Then, to get us all massacred a Horde of hungry, brutal, terribly brutal (from his monstrous lifestyle) people.
UPD:GIGAVETER
GIGAVETER wrote:
This, of course, impossible to leave offspring. Which, incidentally, will oppress those who are not allowed, which means the oppression of the society, level of development and activity.
This is a valuable clarification. Yes, it will depress. Room plague the sick in the infirmary also probably oppressed them. But there is such a concept: to sacrifice something in order not to lose everything.
ColonelJason
ColonelJason wrote:
In China already a long time since there is a limit on the birth rate (somewhat less radical than proposed by me, but still) Not see there decouplings and hostility. But the hostility of the overpopulated poor countries (or rather - generally the poor) kontengent - face.
The Chinese, frankly, quite inhuman in relationship to each other, that many noticed as I was. Incidentally, in spite of communism, but rather national socialism, spread the cult of money, of wealth. Of birth control there is not threatened by the impossibility of procreation, as You surely have noticed, but just the unavailability of significant assistance from the government, which is insufficient for destructive to society confrontations.
Poor and overcrowded and not very country is mostly Muslim, which explains the violence - Islam as some such idealistic notions of life and is opposed to looking into the beyond, that is, in death, life is negligible, and the rules of manifestation in the reality of a person's Islam is full of violence. Remove Islam, reformat value meanings, and the excess violence will be eliminated, although, it's too complicated and unlikely that. Only through war and sweep, but then to restrict anyone, dead?
GIGAVETER
GIGAVETER wrote:
The Chinese, frankly, quite inhuman in relationship to each other, that many have noticed as I am
Never heard of this, the Asians (Mongoloid) say that they, on the contrary, all without exception adhere to group interests, as opposed to Europeans-individualists. However,perhaps group interests on the level of the family/Corporation do not cancel the violence as.
With regards to your assertion that religion determines the violence in society, I think there confused cause and effect. It is not that mythological thinking produce violence in poor countries. Rather, the dictates of mythological thinking occurs in poor countries and is the result of social problems, not their background (although it can certainly feed the problem). Religion always adapts to the economic state of the country.This is easily seen on the example of history. The Islamic world in the period of its economic prosperity (~ middle of the VI - XI century), was the most civilized region of the Earth, the breadbasket of science and of knowledge through it until we reached the works of antiquity. While the first crusaders were a Horde of ignorant barbarians. It is also possible to note that in the above murder statistics by country, the first five (and many subsequent) Catholic and Protestant countries. And, for example, in UAE very low performance. Which, of course, does not negate the problems with legality in poor Muslim countries. But the point here is, again, not the religion itself, and the low standard of living.
GIGAVETER wrote:
reformat value meanings
Yes indeed, value meaning humanity is only one - the pursuit of the good life. And while poor countries will remain poor (and they are, for a number of reasons, will remain as always), no substitutions ideologies will not work to reduce local crime rates.
A. Soldier of Light
You are confusing reasonableness with rationality. Rationality formal, it deals with concepts and categories. But man is above this. The reasonableness of higher and includes self-awareness, principles and ethics. I feel like going back to my Kantian past, but apparently so it will be clearer.
GIGAVETER wrote:
Remove Islam, reformat value meanings, and the excess violence will be eliminated, although, it's too complicated and unlikely that. Only through war and sweep, but then to restrict anyone, dead?
so so so... kindle?
GIGAVETER wrote:
...Islam as some such idealistic notions of life and is opposed to looking into the beyond, that is, in death, life is negligible, and the rules of manifestation in the reality of a person's Islam is full of violence.
GIGAVETER as some like him with idealistic notions are opposed and fixed in the beyond, that is, in death, life is negligible, and the rules of manifestation in the reality of human GIGAVETER full of violence.
... GIGAVETER, as EB, or deny or agree.