Fools love to swarm.
Leonid Filatov's a wonderful actor. A lot of great roles. But the one remembered most.Though to criticize the film, criticize and sensibly - say could not, could never, happen this in the USSR. to the Prosecutor and the prisoner lived in a communal apartment. But art is not a reflection of reality, in addition to reflect the reality of art encompasses more and more. So the fact that the film just used a metaphor in order to bring together - for dialogue - something that nezavisimo.
Leonid Filatov in the movie "the life of the chief of criminal investigation Department".
listen to the song Okudzhava performed by the magnificent Filatov.
just a minute and a half.
And now for srach. What can you tell about the observable fools gathered in a pack? Speak about a pack of fools to enrage.
Spoilers load of the subject - that annoying fools who rushed EN masse to use the fashionable buzzwords.
Nevoeiro
Nevoeiro wrote:
well, here you themselves themselves and denied
What I denied ? I believe that there are fools and there are smart, know how to determine the level of the mind, but I don't know who are considered fools by other people, about what I wrote.
Friends, a little reflection on morality. People who live in fantasy worlds, strachenyh bearded wizards living somewhere in the stratosphere, you know a lot about morality (and indeed everything else) is much better soulless (and Popovych, which is already there) materialists. And, to the delight of us all, they share with us their spiritual, intelligent and generally positive , as we now find out from all sides of the argument. Rather, knowledge - reasoning for fools, idealists do. So,the situation: in the premises of a ban maniac with children. He plans the following: cut faces to children, and urinating on the result, as the latter does not choke. From a you is a button that activate a poison capsule in your body of the maniac, who, as aktivirovannoi, immediately will break the thread of his interesting life.No other options to help the children there. Choice I think is understandable. And what do the crowns of the human race, people who know exactly what is the moral and right thing to do? Nothing. They're not doing anything. After all, higher morality does not imply any violence against anybody. After all, moral debt depends on the circumstances and its violation is equally disgusting as the oligarch and the poor. Therefore, they are whether to stand and wait, and children will be cut face. Great. Keep it up. I suppose that it is particularly gratifying to the followers of the true knowledge if among the children is their child. That is something they will be glad that their child, along with the skin, throw off the shackles of mortal life, thus proving that the prevalence in man idealistically views real morals that's fine, and obviously necessary for the normal existence of people. What joy filled with their hearts, knowing that the fate of his child in such a moment, was not in the hands of a limited degradantov able to afford a disgusting the violation of moral norms, but in the hands spiritualized, enlightened, morally perfect person. Well done, guys. Very common life views.
PS: the idealists, the well-known controversy svom habits polzuus scaly reptiles, will now try ukrytsya in the armor of their dresses transparent demagoguery, and start to talk about third options (a fantasy will include as they say). Friends,turn off your imagination, it's MY hypothetical situation, the number of options reglamentary I, a situation where there are options beyond the above, is other situation, please discuss that separately from this, as to her they are irrelevant have not.
ColonelJason
In fact, you mentioned the connoisseurs of morality and idealists are the most hypocritical people on Earth. Any action or inaction they are willing to justify from the standpoint of a higher morality, impossible to understand left-liberal mob. Accordingly, Buda locked in the room with a maniac with their own child, they will push the button.
Although I'm pretty sure if you cut person offspring of the most hypocritical beings on Earth, instead of bleeding flesh and exposed muscle interweaving we will see one more ugly face.
Wing42
Wing42 wrote:
instead of bleeding flesh and exposed muscle interweaving we will see one more ugly face.
Well...Actually, Yes, people who in adulthood start on a serious soup to grate for high, should be closer...
ColonelJason
ColonelJason wrote:
activating the capsule of poison in your body of the maniac, who, as aktivirovannoi, immediately will break the thread of his interesting life.No other options to help the children there
In the next topic I already wrote about tolstoyanism and that non-resistance to evil by violence, actually has nothing to do with Christianity. Therefore, you should in this case press the button, because to protect the innocent first duty. Save the children and pray for the killer, because sin devoured him completely.
Ryazancev
Ryazancev wrote:
As I'm away for a devout friend and his even more devout wife opened her mouth. I decided to logically think about the commandments and teachings of Christ.
Typical adept Dawkins. Come to noble people in the house and start to fill them logical (lol) nonsense in their ears. Meanness, my friend.
Ryazancev wrote:
Wife said that I am talking heresy and immediately betrayed me anathema.
Did the right thing. I would by the collar, dragged.
Gauguin
the man who invented a new kind of trolling - impenetrable-religious, slightly strengthened (for especially dull) imaginary degeneratizm all disagree with him
ColonelJason
capital trick, believing that smart and eloquent enough to primalennyj Gauguin degenerates to place (as he wished) in place.
A. Soldier of Light
old fart with an equally old truism sanandrei everything pependicular his righteousness.
Wing42
common sense in the flesh... Jesus, Oh what a boring.
vftor
dark horse, by chance(?) wandered into navajelnia all the above brethren pasture talk.
stalker7162534
a ray of light in the darkness, unfortunately, as estrogenami as bright...
and all the rest of their ilk
Spoilergate in the ass!!!
Gauguin wrote:
In the next topic I already wrote about tolstoyanism
You have in each subject tolstoyanism. I would even say that you yourself produce this tolstoyism and impasto in astronomical amounts.
Gauguin wrote:
...non-resistance to evil by violence, actually has nothing to do with Christianity.
What are your arguments?
Gauguin wrote:
I would by the collar, dragged.
I don't think anyone at the table you sat. So wet about dream on me the massacre of the Gentiles and infidels all you like.
Polarities, what would you say is your God, seeing that his loyal servant Gauguin hopelessly stupid and fixated in yourself? Does he really need so... poor fans? If so, if he accepts you, he looks poorer than a beggar on the porch.
Gauguin
Gauguin wrote:
. Therefore, you should in this case press the button
Thank you. For the sake of this statement, which I, of course, envisioned and created that hypothetical situation. Of course the Maxim, which we now derive, any sane person knows himself, but it is especially important and pleasant that stated this is a staunch moralist. So, the concept of morality on people of high spiritual belief: Morality is to kill when you deem it necessary. All. Now it is small. For example, you can convince the people of his nation that some NATs. the goal, say, small people, smart, and ill be the letter R- the enemies are worse than the maniacs that they are neposredstvennaya threat to the innocent ,to protect them-duty. And then, inspired a nation to join hands, and begin planting the representatives of the little people in the train, and take them to specially created institutions, where they, along with their children, are deadly poison jeep. And the nation feel this will be fine-they're not murderers. They are moralists. Morality they not only can she requires - indeed
Gauguin wrote:
protect the innocent first duty
. True moralists, they are the finger in the mouth do not put.
Gauguin wrote:
non-resistance to evil by violence, actually has no relevance to Christianity
Well, here you are, traditionally, FIB - of course, on the web you can find many articles, from spiritualized patriots-theologians, which, as is usual for religious people try to rewrite bringing them the comfort of religion personally for yourself, that would be more comfortable, and says,for example, so someone who, as the Great Russian People God has revealed has revealed the exclusive right to be the sword in his hand if suddenly it comes to the salvation of the great Race, from the gate. However, if you want to spend a little expansion too, all for a good cause. Well, how would these, or similar types fed cheap scholastic logic correct religion for themselves, forced to disappoint you: Christianity not killing dobree.
Wing42
It is not necessary to feed them with rudeness - I think this is an important source of their spiritual energy. As well as, for example, do not look them in the eye or invite to enter your home.
ColonelJason
If these people do not feed them, they will begin to devour themselves, and it is always fatal. Thank you Gauguin'have similar people for the best anti-advertizing of the Christian religion.
ColonelJason
to live and believe it's wonderful) people can not live without faith in a brighter future. at least subconsciously hoped the best for the best. but if the top say he still believes reincarnation or other parallel routes, it is only a plus IMHO
Pilat.
First, you're confusing faith and hope. Hope may be a rational result of the analytical analysis is the assumption that events will develop favorably. Faith is a priori irrational confidence in existence and whether the possibility of anything that cannot be proven in our reality. Secondly, to confuse hope for the best and perhaps. This notion of different categories.Hope for better is the same as just hope, i.e. a tautology. And maybe, this assumption that something happens by chance .
Pilat. wrote:
but if the top say he still believes reincarnation or other parallel routes, it is only a plus
In most cases, this is a definite minus, as a lack of education and sobriety of thinking.
ColonelJason
you're confusing
Yes and no. but I think you understand what was speech. and as there at whom and where - well, whatever. plus or minus - I have this math don't care)
vftor wrote:
What I denied ? I believe that there are fools and there are smart, know how to determine the level of the mind, but I don't know who are considered fools by other people, about what I wrote.
Yes no there are no smart at all and there is no fool around,fool or wise only at certain times and that is the fact.
That fact fool ColonelJason and others,take away their source of iformatio and they strangled themselves,there is only one factor experience! they don't have it.
ColonelJason
if you do not understand that it is hard for me to write,just my thoughts faster than fingers(
The man is an animal,same as all the other inhabitants of the earth,and in many respects they are inferior.
\at the conclusion of the hypocrisy I'm in full agreement with black.
Nevoeiro
Nevoeiro wrote:
if you do not understand that it is hard for me to write,just my thoughts faster than fingers(
No, the problem is not in the fingers,it is slightly higher. The problem is not that your speech is difficult to see the essence, and that your speech is difficult to see it.