Fools love to swarm.
Leonid Filatov's a wonderful actor. A lot of great roles. But the one remembered most.Though to criticize the film, criticize and sensibly - say could not, could never, happen this in the USSR. to the Prosecutor and the prisoner lived in a communal apartment. But art is not a reflection of reality, in addition to reflect the reality of art encompasses more and more. So the fact that the film just used a metaphor in order to bring together - for dialogue - something that nezavisimo.
Leonid Filatov in the movie "the life of the chief of criminal investigation Department".
listen to the song Okudzhava performed by the magnificent Filatov.
just a minute and a half.
And now for srach. What can you tell about the observable fools gathered in a pack? Speak about a pack of fools to enrage.
Spoilers load of the subject - that annoying fools who rushed EN masse to use the fashionable buzzwords.
ColonelJason
not a speech ,but to understand Klasen,not always how you can Express,but you maliciously used the Ice zepelin)
sometimes people to protect the flocks,and through the dark streets to walk alone is dangerous.
Zhudomason
Even flock to see it. We have somehow a crowd of boys in the evening by vocational schools took place. So they robbed another crowd.
Passengers trains of Moscow-Odessa realized that something went wrong when on the car with a tense face was Steven Seagal.
MelShlemming
it happens,but still, it at least will not allow any one to attack the person ,but if someone beats that the crowd will not remain without attention.
Hope for the best (a bright future) = to believe in a bright future. Find ten differences, as they say ))
That forehead, that forehead...
Nevoeiro wrote:
WHY IS THAT FUNNY?
Don't know, I speak for myself -)
Gauguin wrote:
In the next topic I already wrote about tolstoyanism and that non-resistance to evil by violence, actually has nothing to do with Christianity.
And what turn the other cheek? This is where then?
Socialization, is that so surprising?
Regarding the Soviet film, where Lukashenko sings on the housing Seating for vodka and salads, I can say that the construction of the everyday in art, fortunately, did not full-scale because of cultural differences. Fortunately, two hours of dreary bazaars about jellied fish, taking a shower in street clothes and driving under the influence, may not be interesting to people living outside the territory of the half-life of the USSR. And since art is a universal concept, some outstanding filmmakers, as a rule, avoid business casual, otherwise Tarkovsky would have made the film with the episode washing dishes for 30 minutes.
Self-Murderer wrote:
So who is behind it drowns in the end?
Conducted a survey by giving a few options to choose from &)
the endless misanthropy of the black cosmos wrote:
And since art is a universal concept, some outstanding filmmakers, as a rule, avoid business casual, otherwise Tarkovsky would have made the film with the episode washing dishes for 30 minutes.
The problem in places where they encounter people with different taste in terms of art preferences. For when one seems to be funny and sweet naked pop, the other one says that this is crap, not art, burn! =]