Not bad to ship the graphics card 100% ?

Marsj
What? And the proofs will be 0 rpm?
What nonsense are you writing?
So I installed the system and rolled up the drivers, no game or program will burn my video card.

Alexander Kozlov Evgenievich
Failure of the automatic mode, resets the fan speed to zero.

Marsj Mode
failure and everything else that you describe is a warranty case or a factory defect.
In general, change the map for any.

Marsj,
as they said, is a guarantee, but it seems to me that you just don’t care about the cards and that their fans do not rotate until the card reaches 60 degrees, for example, and you already have panic, All indicators are at zero, everything will burn out.
100% load 80 degrees at the peak, 5 years of work normal flight

changed the paste and the thermal pad, the temperature on the card dropped at the peak to 72, continues to plow further.

I don't like these fanatics, I will sit on 30 frames so that the card does not warm up and not load, I will not put the swap file on the SSD and in general I will not throw games on it, I will not raise the brightness on the monitor, otherwise it will burn out and other nonsense.
you want to leave a computer there to great-grandchildren? Yes, it will become morally obsolete in 5 years and when it burns out, you can safely go for a new one.
You don’t leave your jacket in the frosty closet so as not to try it, but the fact that it’s cold, so what, galvneo that you are whole and singing that you took it for your warmth, the scheme is about the same.
everything should work and even work out what you bought it for))

Brief summary.
From many sources, and most importantly from the specific practice of users, 100% loading of a video card is possible, subject to the manufacturer's temperature conditions. There is no obvious wear.
PS I consider the topic of 100% loading of a video card in games to be relevant. Many people touched upon this regime. On the Internet, I have not met a test study of this issue. Who has information, where to look - share.

VIPn1,
I did not even think about this question, it is already clear from the beginning that if the game works correctly out of the box, within the given thermal limits and 100 loads, then this is normal for her, why in general there were doubts that such a load is somehow dangerous? here people have overclocked cards with free voltages and overclocks for many years, and here they are concerned about the stock.

From experience I can say that if nothing sipped in the first month or half a year, it means that it will work for years, there are exceptions, but these are already special cases.

there was a gtx560 which after a couple of years warmed up to 94 like agrudos and started throwing artifacts in battle 3, in the form of black stripes, but played so calmly by throwing back the side wall, then I did not know about thermal paste not about organizing cooling in the case, the card was sold and the person did not make claims.
percent i5 3550 worked in a slight overclocking to 4.1 by lifting the spring a little, the temperature was around 50 garudos, for 6 years he plowed with me, took a boo, and the old man is sluggish, now he plows without problems.
also with hardy and SSD did not blow dust particles as it was convenient for me.

so a strange topic similar to unreasonable paranoia

SPR1GGAN
I don't focus on temperature and durability. He expressed his opinion earlier, and also summed up the opinions of users. It's not about that.
Take, AT LEAST AN EXAMPLE, the inevitably floating FPS at 100% map load. Without going into the jungle, I report that the test-specialists of "hardware" found a deterioration in playability in this case. This is just a visible example.
I have not seen a complete analysis of the computer's work and the impact on the perception of the game in this mode, 100% GPU load. Therefore, it is not obvious which is better - 144 Hz at 100% load or 120 Hz at 90%. Perhaps for the majority this is not necessary, but whoever has a high-quality computer. it is useful for a technician to possess this information, because they have striven for the highest quality.

VIPn1
Most likely, for such information you need to take statistical studies.

It is clear that in the general picture, if you collect statistics, then 100% loaded video cards will fail more often than video cards that, for whatever reason, are not fully loaded. The main options:
- They work at higher temperatures, therefore a lot of problems follow: degradation of thermal paste (especially the trouble with factory ones), degradation of thermal pads and their excessive leakage, accelerated chip blade if it heats up very well.
- Fans under heavy load work more intensively, which leads to their relatively quick failure.
If a person watches over the iron, then this greatly reduces the chance of early death of the card.

Graphics cards have too little lifespan to worry about 100% utilization. It is unlikely that after 3-4 years of active use in games, the video card will die. Especially considering that middle-class cards don't get too hot. For example, from 2008 or 2009 to 2016, I had a gtx 260 in the form of a Chinese turbine in my desktop PC. The TDP was about 180 watts. I did not clean the video card during cleaning, because the case there covered the entire cooling system, and then I was afraid to go into the cards. Why am I this: the card is not out of order, nothing has fallen off. The computer was sold in working order for an office PC, so there is a possibility that the card is still alive there. For full-fledged statistics, this is not enough, but as an example of the fact that cards can live without special care for a long time - it’s quite for itself.

OkGo
The simplest statistics is the state of cards after a year of mining or a year lying on a store shelf. Well, these are indicative extremes. In general, no one denies wear and tear during operation. People say that in this mode, the change in the state of the card is almost imperceptible.

saa0891
Stable temperature during idle 35-45 degrees and in games it is desirable to have about 65-70 degrees or less, above 75 can also be played, but purely my spiritual feeling says that 75 is already a bit too much and there is no temperature reserve, if the card is still warming up, then you can do it undervolting, but at the expense of 100% loading of the graphic chip, then it's not ssy if you have 65 degrees and 100% load, then all the rules, since the power of the video card must work out every penny lizh would not get warm

Is it possible to load the gtx 1650 up to 100% ??

Is it possible to load the gtx 1650 up to 100% ??

DeN4Ik2808
It should work like that, it's simple it will only consume more watts, well, that is, as stated by the manufacturer, the one that works for 100 or 50%, the main thing is that the temperatures are normal.

I don't know... Sometimes you look at the tests of video cards and are surprised - the chips give out 100+ FPS and load 99% stably. According to the reviewers, this is good and so it should be, but ... With all this, you can see how the frames are torn. It looks extremely absurd and disgusting. Why would a video card put out more frames than a monitor can output? Why not. Just stupidity and shortsightedness of fellow reviewers. For myself, I came up with a formula - to lock at the level of the FPS driver at 60 and not worry about overheating and frame breaks. The video card has excessive performance for the resolution and ultra settings I need. So why rape her? Let it be loaded by 70-75%, have a comfortable temperature and silent fans.

Marikman
Now there are FreeSync, G-sync, Adaptive sync technologies from frame tearing.

Marikman
1, What you see in a video on YouTube is not equal to what a person saw on his monitor at the time of recording.
2, FPS is not only the frames on your monitor, but also a measure of the performance of the game, and the higher this figure, the more accurate and responsive the control in the game. In many games, this is an additional comfort.
3, 144+ hertz monitors with adaptive sync are now in wide use. Everything is relative. For some, a black and white image with mono sound is a miracle of miracles, and for someone, 60 fps at 60 hertz is a lagodrome, and the more dynamic the game, the stronger this lagodrome is felt.
4, When locking FPS, you need to start from temperatures, and not from FPS and GPU workload. In different games, supposedly the same load of the GPU for monitoring can lead to different temperatures, especially for the hotspot. It makes no sense (except for laziness) to indiscriminately set the FPS lock to the same value in all games, the dynamism in games is different, the requirements for FPS are different.
5, Normal undervolting also reduces temperature and noise.

When I bought the rx6600 card (written in the profile), I looked at the reviews, one claimed that such G cards fail very quickly. I’ve probably been using it for half a year, while the flight is normal, only set the speed of the propellers in Andernaline. Maybe I’ll give a good example, or maybe no. There was a power supply, it served for more than ten years, it even almost burned out, I got the dust * attached from there, it's time to change (it's in working condition, and it's a pity to throw it away, it only fits old motherboards). When I changed the power supply, I decided to ask what people write about him. In general, 80% is one negative. So I think whoever is lucky with this technique. Yes, we must also take into account the factory marriage, but that's another story.

Nervios
I use BP from chiftek. And in a working PC, and in a gaming PC, and in other PCs, there are only chifteks.
So, I have one PC, on which all the smart mirrors in the house, cameras and some other electronics are displayed. There is a 250v chiptek there. PC works 24/7. I bought a PSU somewhere in 2008. It still works without interruption. The block has never been disassembled, never cleaned of dust. But there is a fairly powerful airflow system, the type, as in server stations. Bp itself, like platinum, but definitely not lower than gold.
In my opinion, if I took some kind of Chinese vyser for 1k, he would have died in a month. So it's better not to take risks and take something reliable and of high quality. No wonder they put platinum and gold ratings on the PSU.

Salyarych
Yes, the chieftek himself was in 2006 for a kilowatt sold it without problems, immediately worked without problems. He also updated a more modern model for the chieftek.

Salyarych
Power supplies shorten their service life at high temperatures. Gold can have 100,000 hours to fail. If there are 8760 hours in a year, then such a PSU should be enough for 11 years of continuous operation. I also have Chiftek Gold for 1 kW. I took it in 2014 for the day before the iron price spike