Inconsistencies in lore[Spoilers] (Assassin's Creed: Origins)
Good day, stand to open debate on an interesting subject: We are everywhere saying that this part about the origin of the brotherhood, about the first assassin, etc.Actually 1 not matchmaking: We presents hidden blade, the wife of HS, saying that it was a gift from Cleopatra. If you remember in AC2 there was a statue of the Creator(or rather those who 1 used it once) - Darius.
As you can see, he wears the symbols of the fraternity, the more it is mentioned everywhere as the assassin. Although at the end of Origins, we see that the sign of the assassins was concocted by accident, and the fraternity was born too late feat Darius. You can also mention what was said to the knights Templar brought to power Cleopatra(although in reality it is a deception used medzev) and the fact that Brutus had planned the attack and killed Caesar(not the same Aya).
What do you think about this?
can he in fact was the first assassin,only consisted of a clean single,and the organization appeared during bayaka?
I think that the story told in the first assassin is not a dogma. Over in star wars was one story, and after began to leave the films after part 6, the story became different. It is also here. Was koalas the con ' situation on - it was so the next part will be the commercials.
and what period this Darius? and here's another fraternity and could not engender in different places?
nait123321 wrote:
the fact that Brutus had planned the attack and killed Caesar(not the same Aya).
it could just hide.
P. S. Telling the story of the first assassin, the developers backed themselves into a dead end. After all, the previous part of the game has already reached the 19th century. If you go further into the 20th century, it will have a Hitman, Call of Duty or some kind of cyberpunk, i.e., the series degenerates. From outstanding the game of historical periods, is that the era of the Roman Empire remained. But deeper, in more ancient times still digging it would be much, but it was impossible. Let's see where will bring it igropulo on, I really hope in the future.
hanterwow
somewhere 500 years BC
vitalik76
nonsense,you can still million eras to play,ancient Rome,ancient Russia during the takeover by the Mongols, ancient China, Japan,war of the roses,same old Russia but it was during the Polish intervention,the scope of the game almost limitless
nait123321
nait123321 wrote:
the Templars brought to power Cleopatra(although in reality it is a deception used macaev)
You have trouble understanding the situation and its causes. The Templars were intentionally able to adjust certain events, so that Cleopatra could use to climb to the throne, deceiving mediev.
nait123321 wrote:
And the fact that Brutus had planned the attack and killed Caesar(not the same Aya)
Well, as it kind of never mentioned that the murder was planned by Aya. She only killed Cleopatra then.
About the inconsistencies, donapost:
1) Darius in AC 2 was announced as the first assassin, who invented the hidden blade and used it to kill the Xerxes, it was in the year 476 BC (recall that the Origins of the events of 49 BC). Now we see that the blade of Darius quite a does not require cutting the finger, and Biek his finger was accidentally chromanol, well, it happened. But at the end of the show, as Tahir cuts his finger, too, has specifically, in the face of Baleka. After a disastrous movie by the AU, with a bunch of errors and inconsistencies poured in ENT games, Yubisoft apparently decided to stick to the line that cut off finger was a tradition, as a tribute to the Brotherhood and not at all the imperfections of the blade, as we are told in 1 and 2 parts. So Altair with his code, the drawings of the improved blade, which are then used Leonardo da Vinci to create the blade of Ezio (it, by the way, and trollol on this subject, they say give me the finger, cut off the will, and no, we're not kidding), is a forest. First, they focused on the blades 1 and 2 parts, so much so that it is impossible to forget, and now just picked up and started to do trash. As if this was done by people who do in the previous part was not playing, even with the plot not familiar.
2) To Baleka in AC 2 was shown more ancient assassins (I will emphasize, assassins, already with his symbol of belonging to the Brotherhood, etc., about what we announced in the game):
Darius (Persian assassin) to 476 BC killed hidden blade of Xerxes.
- Itani (Babylonian assassin) in 323 BC by poison of Alexander the great.
- Wei Yu (Chinese assassin) in 210 BCE, killed the Emperor with a spear.
Others were already late, just after the events in Origins (Amunet, Leonius, Brutus, Qulan Gal, Altair) . All of these assassins in AC 2 was presented as the Great, each had their own statue under the Monteriggioni Villa, and the tomb with the sarcophagus in the different cities of Italy (except for al) with appropriate design and symbolism.
This is not to mention that as much as assassins are generally in the time of 'ISA was born, they were people who had abilities in the style of eagle vision and immunity to the action of the artifacts of Eden, so good to kill' ISA (precursors), for he had absorbed their DNA. And kill they have started because of the war, which unleashed Adam and eve, when he fled from Eden and stole an Apple. They wanted freedom for all people, so he started a rebellion and a war at the same time and his order was founded. Then came the first threat of the Toba catastrophe, the war stopped and everyone was looking for a way to survive, but did not succeed. Killing many ISA (there initially were few), there were more people, so they survived and continued their family. And ISU eventually died, people began to consider them for the Gods, for it took many thousands of years. The Templars, the situation is similar, they are from the same era came when the son of Adam and eve, rebelled against the ideas of the parents and decided to create his order, incidentally killing brother and stealing the Apple, and the war between the orders unleashed. What nafik Sources in the game can be? All this was presented for many years, in games, books, comics, an interview with the developers. And all this Yubisoft themselves invented and called Canon.
And now Yubisoft with the Origins of the film and sent his ENT in 3 letters. In the film, Aguilar 1500 years of running around with a severed finger when all Italian Assassini has long been used normal blades, and Ezio even in Spain was there and helped the Brotherhood. No, it's not a bug, you chtoooo, just Aguilar chromanol finger to prove loyalty to the Brotherhood. The Origins of the same umasou smell. No, guys, forget the blade of as 1, not it was the case, just all the fingers were shred to truth to prove)))000 Or then officially announced that the Origins - a game about the education of the Egyptian brotherhood, what makes you think that assassins in principle. Or does part 2 not Canon will announce (it's happened with another game, just about the adventures of Ezio in Spain - the Canon, not the Canon, then again the Canon).
3) About the Egyptian assassin Amunet we learned more from the 2nd part. Her statue was under the Villa in Monteriggioni, just like the statue of Darius, Itani etc.
In AC 2 was the tomb of Amunet in Venice, from her sarcophagus Ezio pulled the part of the press. We know that Aya = Amunet. And that her mummy Leyla found near Bayeke in... Egypt!. Actually the question - what the frack? Or then it turns out that her sarcophagus suddenly decided to move to Egypt, right next to BICOM to leave?
In General, this game gave not a portion of the answers to the questions, and a portion of the new errors, discrepancies and issues. The origins of what it was? Brotherhood? And the Fraternity in General or the Egyptian? Or the origins of the Templars and their war with assasinate? What progress the game has given the plot of the series (the historical part of the game)? We learned something new? This expanded lore of the series? Personally, I think not.
1 - something complicated? Darius made a blade, the other, different from those we know, after almost 500 years, he came in modified form to the Egyptians. Baleka taught to use it so as not to cut your finger, but the accident happened, and he slashed his finger. Fanatics, followers of the order, saw this and took for granted as a necessary sacrifice that you need to bring the brotherhood to be part of it. So tradition and formed, for the most part, especially in the archaic society with magical consciousness.
2 - do You feel the scope and the environment in which civilization originate? They didn't have Internet like yours, so everyone would have a manual that says by the WAY, FINGER HACK OPTIONAL, and the fact that you've painted about the Baptist and all the other crap is for games does not apply and should not apply. Grosellina is grosellina, filmesana - there filmesana, comics is comics.
3 - In the tombs, in the second part, we find only discs, although they are hidden by the ancestors, what's her corpse? And even if so, why it couldn't take to the Egypt/Italy as the Shrine, as the Holy relics, for example? What you're doing in General lit? Apparently, the lack of knowledge and understanding, together with an immense sense of pride do not allow to live. The latest game is so perfectly tie everything in the previous parts that there is no kynoselen marvel never dreamed of, and you because of their problems with formal logic and historical blindness spoil yourself and others the impression, calm down.