The weakest, the most high. (Fallout 4)
People who what plays? And the weakest system where you will go foul on medium high?To as comfortable as possible at F4 to play the right hospital where over 120 000(with Monica and pribambasami 150 000)...Ie it batrachit half a year to save up and leave the family with half a nose to play the game,which will start to get bored after 50 hours..This cutlet from sobachatiny,but alas(
Yes, the normal requirements.. iron 3 years ago almost on the ultra pulls
phenom X6 1090T+HD7870+12GB
AMD 255 2x3.1, GeForce550Ti, 4Gb 1333, everything low, shadows off, grass off. In the world there is no lag in some areas is slow because of the large number of light sources.
My:
i5 2450M
6GB RAM
gf 520mx (very weak vidyuhi) infusion were taken at zero, but the picture is the same as a normal I would have removed the brakes by lowering the resolution of images from 1366x768 to 1024x768, but the third picture does not change
Dzhamshut-blah Yes wasteland and a Pentium 2 pull VAS, go to Boston and to the plant College take a walk and then to talk about the laptop 2009 your
Dzhamshut-blah
Yes, before they pulled up the optimization of any in the patches that the light sources bugnote this is exactly the statics would be like Stalker did and all clear would be immediately felt.
Helped the paging file...
More than 4 gig game takes on the frame,checked!
Bet the swap space on the disk where the game...
Not default as long as there are Rama - an example 4096-4096
Good luck!
LordYan
after a few hours 8.5 gig operatives I have eaten in the fullhd resolution
AMD Phenom II x4 955 and Gigabyte HD7770 1GB, 4GB RAM
worn out HDD(around 100/100) At low or medium at any resolution(1920x1080-1366x768) is almost the same unstable fps,which is every 10 minutes of the game less and less
-SSD On low 60 fps(1080) subsidence(from ultraprevention lighting and smoke)
on average 45-60 with the same drawdown
resolution doesn't matter, the problem in a squalid setting and optimization, terrible software cluttering RAM and an incredible dependence on hdd\ssd
Confirm the relevance of the use of SSD. After moving the game to SSD performance has increased. Play on 1280x1024 HD5700 1 gig, AMD Phenom II x4 955, RAM 12, the selected settings are Average. FPS 35. Download saves locations from 4 to 20 sec.
Here I found a good analysis of the graphics settings.By the way, confirm the information for loading of video memory - more than 3 GB in use
Спойлерhttp://nvplay.ru/games/fallout-4-rukovodstvo-po-graficheskim-nastrojkam
probably the lowest pitch for this ultra фх6100 12-16GB of RAM and a card with 3GB of the 7970 level and more productive
Minh 690 and actually I am able to adequately loaded the map up to the ceiling at 1080p. however, I have experienced many problems with the performance from both cards and the performance loss from the CPU. I had to disperse so technically this pitch is not suitable for ultra-toths. and if you add to this fact, fashion...
so the lower limit of the ultra is quite possible to assume naturally approximately the same pitch as in the description of system requirements. current processor is weaker. level фх8320-8350
what's the average high do not know. on average 2GB card the 680 is a normal enough at 1080p
Hi all. Could you tell about my iron? Notebook HP 15-n010sr
CPU: amd a10-4655m
RAM: 8 GB
Video card: amd radeon hd 7620g ( and I understand there are two graphics cards, the second one sucks)
I don't know really, but I have that lag badly, although the computer did not seem the weakest
Put the patch on optimization, there is still low FPS...
What can be the reason??