Mako vs Hammerhead vs Nomad (Mass Effect: Andromeda)
What is better Mako , Hammerhead or Nomad?I, unlike most, hammer loved) Mako always wanted to fly over these endless mountains, and the sensitivity of the controls, in my opinion, this is too clever by half, but the cons end, in battle, he was undoubtedly better.
M-44 Hammer - purely a reconnaissance vehicle. Very fast and maneuverable. Three solid-propellant rocket engine vertical thrust in combination with a nucleus of mass effect not only keeps the car in the meter and a half above the ground, but also allow you to make jumps, overcoming obstacles and climbing into inaccessible to wheeled vehicles space. Boosters provide an opportunity to develop high speed. Homing missiles allow you to be at the enemy with great accuracy from great distances (that for gameplay minus, of course), without getting involved in the melee and being all radius sighting range of fire arms light enemy units.
But to ensure all these qualities needed for a light reconnaissance vehicle, it is necessary to sacrifice something. So, on the Hammer cannot be set heavy and durable armor. It just is no kinetic barrier. But these shortcomings are absolutely justified by the car class: M-44 was created to be not well protected tank, and a means of exploration, although it may repel the superior forces of the enemy.
Conclusion - a good hovertank. The feel of the controls they are very positive. The main weapon is speed and maneuverability.
M-35 Mako - infantry fighting vehicle. Fast enough to promptly deliver a team of Marines to the location of the job, and at the same time protected enough to bring it safely: good armor and powerful kinetic shield in stock. Rapid-fire mass accelerator anti-personnel assignments effectively deal with the walking enemy forces, no matter whether light or heavy infantry and heavy anti-tank gun gives you the trump card in the struggle with the enemy vehicles. The core of mass effect, greatly facilitate the car, and small jet engines provide an opportunity to take neskolkometrovuyu jumping, dodging thereby from missiles or escaping from difficult places, or allowing to extinguish speed before hitting the ground after jumping from the hill.
From disadvantage is not the best handling and long recovery time of the shield.
Conclusion - a good car. Gets me where I want, and it will give good protection and firepower.
Nomad ND1 — reconnaissance and research vehicle, based on "the Tempest". Designed for safe and fast overcoming almost any surface during the exploration of the worlds of congestion of Elea. The Rover is equipped with two hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells, reactor-based zero-kinetic element and the protective shield. Has independent suspension for each wheel and interchangeable four - or six-wheel drive (allows you to switch to speed mode to overcome the space at high speed, or in the mode of the vehicle to overcome the impassable landscape at the expense of speed), and a dual accelerator and running on helium-3 micro-motors to overcome difficult terrain.
Given the potentially different conditions of the studied worlds, "Nomad", due to the modular principle, can be modified according to the anticipated complications during the exploration, study and travel. The modification is subjected to a lot of things, starting with the boosters and the life-support systems and ending with the kinetic shield, radar and color.
On top of that, the Nomad is also equipped with a shield impulse to protect, scanners for examination of the surface and the detection of rich deposits and the mining drones for mining.
Conclusion-a good transport.It can be improved unlike the previous 2, BUT HE wasn'T ARMED.
Hirok wrote:
All this time, a nomad in a Storm
How do you know? We temporary part - how many on the posts and the Nexus is unclear.
Hirok wrote:
And this is all nonsense, given the fact that the car on any laboratory workbench can be improved.
Heard about the game simplifications? Or that improve existing is easier than to invent and make a totally new one?
Hirok wrote:
don't be Mako from the first part
Probably the main thing out of all dispute. There would be Mako, it would be killed, Yes?
Hirok wrote:
there is nothing new in the system was not
Oh? How do you know that in another galaxy? And why Mako DOX everywhere? Ah Yes, laziness of developers - you're writing itself. And what he says about the fact that the game is not played, even the first post not read. It's a research machine and scanners and drones, etc.
Z126 wrote:
KHETY easily take over the nexus and the ark
MM. Right after capture? Conquest - invasion, ie fights on Board than there will help orbits.guns and the Mako, from which this conversation went? Decide there is already the inhabitants and their weapons. Orbit cannons - reduce (in the best case all shot down), but nothing is guaranteed - if we are talking about capturing. Well, the destruction of another conversation.
Z126 wrote:
without a good protection
The best defense is attack? Protection they have, they have the engine there at all was advanced at the time of departure, ie the protection of mobility and armor is present - what with the security system for the ships themselves, I personally do not know. You know what Storm without her, for fully relied only on the engine, as we always say two (or one, if it is technically) a member of the crew, if you talk to them. The station is the same - personally I have not seen, and we are not so often.
What does it all have to the Nomad? And to my opinion? Didn't You write:
Z126 wrote:
AND I REMIND YOU THAT THE TOPIC IS NOT ABOUT WHY THE NOMAD HAS NO WEAPONS!HERE PEOPLE EXPRESS THEIR OPINION ON THE TOPIC WHAT IS BETTER MAKO OR HAMMERHEAD NOMAD
EMPs
EMPs wrote:
MM. Right after capture? Conquest - invasion, ie fights on Board than there will help orbits.guns and the Mako, from which this conversation went? Decide there is already the inhabitants and their weapons. Orbit cannons - reduce (in the best case all shot down), but nothing is guaranteed - if we are talking about capturing. Well, the destruction of another conversation.
The protective system will help to protect the station. For example , you can shoot down transporters. Normal protection would be able to repel Khatam. And
EMPs wrote:
The best defense is attack? Protection they have, they have the engine there at all was advanced at the time of departure, ie the protection of mobility and armor is present - what with the security system for the ships themselves, I personally do not know. You know what Storm without her, for fully relied only on the engine, as we always say two (or one, if it is technically) a member of the crew, if you talk to them. The station is the same - personally I have not seen, and we are not so often.
And Mako was stronger than nomad , was armed and was able to go to the mountains , in contrast to the iron banks on wheels.
Hammer also would fit since he has a scanner and the ability to obtain resources. And again he was armed. + Hammer can move faster and can fly at low altitude .
EMPs wrote:
The best defense is attack? Protection they have, they have the engine there at all was advanced at the time of departure, ie the protection of mobility and armor is present - what with the security system for the ships themselves, I personally do not know. You know what Storm without her, for fully relied only on the engine, as we always say two (or one, if it is technically) a member of the crew, if you talk to them. The station is the same - personally I have not seen, and we are not so often.
No, not an attack. If they armed the nomads , the nexus , the Storm and the ark then such problems with Khatami would not exist. Hyperion would not be captured , and if captured it would have suffered heavy losses.
EMPs wrote:
What does it all have to the Nomad? And to my opinion? Didn't You write:
Z126 wrote:
AND I REMIND YOU THAT THE TOPIC IS NOT ABOUT WHY THE NOMAD HAS NO WEAPONS!HERE PEOPLE EXPRESS THEIR OPINION ON THE TOPIC WHAT IS BETTER MAKO OR HAMMERHEAD NOMAD
Yes, I wrote. And reminded that the topic is not about the nomad not to litter it , but it's too late...
And on the topic of WHAT is BETTER MAKO OR HAMMERHEAD NOMAD I have nothing to say . The debate here about why this Nomad no weapons.
EMPs wrote:
How do you know? We temporary part - how many on the posts and the Nexus is unclear.
That is, some gaming conventions are an excuse, while others - not?
Cool, not deceitful, not hypocritical, not dual mode logic)
EMPs wrote:
Probably the main thing out of all dispute. There would be Mako, it would be killed, Yes?
Don't be Mako, talks about why there are no guns, there would be much less, because when re-inventing the wheel, but square and out of shit and sticks, it at least raises the question of the adequacy of the person who does it.
EMPs wrote:
Oh? How do you know that in another galaxy? And why Mako DOX everywhere? Ah Yes, laziness of developers - you're writing itself. And what he says about the fact that the game is not played, even the first post not read. It's a research machine and scanners and drones, etc
Where the expedition knew that in another galaxy? Were flying blind? Oh yeah, they also had technology that identified the suitability of the planets through overdoer light years, and if not the blight, it had no problems at all.
Of course I didn't(sarcasm).
Hirok wrote:
Cool, not deceitful, not hypocritical, not dual mode logic)
Learn from masters - to Mako for a couple of minutes the whole planet traveled, and all arranged - immediately location hours examining, with these kvestiki. And we are not allowed everywhere, what is not a part - a specific conditions, radiation/cold, etc. We get there, but also die. But during your pet, do not even have added (although they could)
Hirok wrote:
it at least raises the question of the adequacy of the person who does it.
The wheel is one of the fundamental inventions, to say that Mako is such that it was not them - at least what you wrote.
Hirok wrote:
if not for the blight, it had no problems at all.
Yeah, maybe. I must reveal another great mystery to us on many planets show satellites withdrawals of data, even something with them in quests like it (or just the NPC said, I do not remember) - from the data we can conclude, so for 600 years, knowing the system - I did not say star to turn into a dwarf, the system will not fit and flew out there
Z126 wrote:
For example , you can shoot down transporters
I kind of wrote. Can't you even read carefully? Already flooding in several pages.
Z126 wrote:
Mako was stronger than nomad , was armed and was able to go to the mountains
Stronger, because he once shot a shield? Or because we the entire planet to go around, not knowing about the radiation and other conditions? Maybe a trivial thing in the study?
Z126 wrote:the Hammer could move faster and could fly at low altitude
Faster and take off? And now remember the description of him, even if too lazy to go far - it has been higher, with nothing from me. And what we see there? UPS have both Hammer they smoother and last longer - corny because of the design, but corny vertical, if to judge on ME, he could not - this can bounce. Speed? You can bet, especially if you compare different places.
And this comparison venezolano, again. The fact that the Nomad was for research (i.e. the speed/protection/capacity/permeability - it is much more important), and a Hammer and Mako were military.
Combat all-terrain vehicle "Mako" (the Class BMP) adapted for operation in harsh environment (armour transport is sturdy enough and can withstand dropping from a great height, high and low temperatures), and is equipped with jet motors to move on planets with low gravity. The interior space is very limited. Chassis and control Rover on the similarity to the tank. Conclusion - Yes armor, but the engine - no dump, no speed, no maneuverability.(the roof of which is in an uninhabited tower mounted mass accelerator of the caliber of 155 mm and coupled with it machine gun) - researchers why? Combat all-terrain vehicle?
Infantry fighting vehicle M-44 "Sickle" (Class BMP) is moving above the battlefield at speeds up to 120 kilometers per hour, equipped with a weaker kinetic barrier (the Mako), poorly armored and more vulnerable to low temperatures - output speed+agility and all (Yes, even armed with a missile launcher — which is much more powerful than machine guns and more rapid-fire than a gun from Mako - but for researchers how?)
Intelligence research and all-terrain Nomad ND1 (Class of Vehicle) top speed of "Nomad" — more than 130 km/h. Designed for safe and fast overcoming almost any surface during the exploration of the worlds Modular system -modification is subjected to a lot of things, starting with the boosters and the life-support systems and ending with the kinetic shield, radar. On top of that, the Nomad is also equipped with a shield impulse to protect, scanners for examination of the surface and the detection of rich deposits and the mining drones for mining. Conclusion - the speed, the maneuverability, improved DLC and shields - something that is important in the study.
In addition the BMP (military) vs. the Rover (research) and compare the weapons, true logic.
Z126 wrote:
The debate here about why this Nomad no weapons.
Well, I compare reconnaissance. the car (even BMP) and ordinary military jeep, the second without arms, with it legitimate. What does not suit it in the game... is not the technique problem.
Z126 wrote:
If they armed the nomads
If we got all the weapons. So it sounds (not in the game and the sense, namely, in real life)
Nexus - team. What else could fly from other ARKS, is not clear.
Storm - we all playing our pilot rubs what's the engine, the fastest ship etc, there's just no room at the uber guns and armor. And we do not get tired to repeat it.
EMPs
EMPs wrote:
Stronger, because he once shot a shield? Or because we the entire planet to go around, not knowing about the radiation and other conditions? Maybe a trivial thing in the study?
He had a normal life support system , not a cheap knockoff.
EMPs wrote:
Faster and take off? And now remember the description of him, even if too lazy to go far - it has been higher, with nothing from me. And what we see there? UPS have both Hammer they smoother and last longer - corny because of the design, but corny vertical, if to judge on ME, he could not - this can bounce. Speed? You can bet, especially if you compare different places.
And this comparison venezolano, again. The fact that the Nomad was for research (i.e. the speed/protection/capacity/permeability - it is much more important), and a Hammer and Mako were military.
The hammer flew to where a large distance. Not
EMPs wrote:
corny vertically
it can be controlled in flight.
EMPs wrote:
I kind of wrote. Can't you even read carefully? Already flooding in several pages.
I just gave an example . But normal weapons could bring down several other larger ships.
EMPs wrote:
Conclusion - Yes armor, but the engine - no dump, no speed, no maneuverability.(the roof of which is in an uninhabited tower mounted mass accelerator of the caliber of 155 mm and coupled with it machine gun) - researchers why? Combat all-terrain vehicle?
To protect themselves in case of threat , genius! There almost half of the planets have KHETY . And as I wrote earlier , that if we flew to the race which would be us ...not very happy.
EMPs wrote:
conclusion the speed+agility and all (Yes, even armed with a missile launcher — which is much more powerful than machine guns and more rapid-fire than a gun from Mako - but for researchers how?)
Again for protection. + Hammer mining resources ,navigate over water , and as I wrote earlier, can fly to a certain height
EMPs wrote:
Conclusion - the speed, the maneuverability, improved DLC and shields - something that is important in the study.
This metal scrap even uphill hard drives, unlike the previous 2.
Mako quietly went in all conditions here it is a good DLC. Yes, Hammer this, unfortunately ,was the problem.
EMPs wrote:
Well, I compare reconnaissance. the car (even BMP) and ordinary military jeep, the second without arms, with it legitimate. What does not suit it in the game... is not the technique problem.
I wrote a long time why this misunderstanding need weapons.
EMPs wrote:
what it will help orbits.guns and the Mako, from which this conversation went? Decide there is already the inhabitants and their weapons.
Mako can help protect the colonies from khattou and rocar.
EMPs wrote:
If we got all the weapons. So it sounds (not in the game and the sense, namely, in real life)
Nexus - team. What else could fly from other ARKS, is not clear.
Equip nomad=give all weapons?
EMPs wrote:
Nexus - team. What else could fly from other ARKS, is not clear.
This does not justify the lack of normal weapons on the Nexus.
EMPs wrote:
Storm - we all playing our pilot rubs what's the engine, the fastest ship etc, there's just no room at the uber guns and armor. And we do not get tired to repeat it.
The tempest - dumb pleasure yacht. Okay, no weapons.. But no armor, which made the catwalk for a fashion show by cutting to the meeting room, Cabin of perfoprmance .... he's a rock star? Why , a priori, hanging out in the submarine are captain's mansions? If it's a scout - where's the equipment? Why conveyor are lifted on a hydraulic lift in the air? Where's the crew??? If Cerberus frigate ( which incidentally was the pinnacle of technology at the time) as many as THREE mechanics , then clearly outdated the Tempest is one Gil ... and all! Type SAM too decrepit SUSIE age..))
Here's another...
The captain spoilerroom in size is inferior except that the meeting room and hangar. First size and layout is more appropriate for the office, never seen discussing used all the space, even the whole team. The second huge for the Nomad, with a strange lift and lack of even a simple crane lift. There have got even a single hook under the roof of the hangar, most of the space useless. Even the Elevator nomad would make sense they stripped the hangar on the deck and take in the center of the opening under the Elevator. Against the background of little cubicles technical and biological laboratory on the ship on which reconnaissance and scientific equipment should take the lion's share of space, useless mansions and a huge empty space with a table (which is easy to spread across laboratories, cabins and the bridge) - shaped waste.
And the main question. In the crew quarters as much as 4 beds. Cello, Suvi, Gil, Lexi. And where was the intention of the builders of the ship to sleep the command of pioneer? The same team of Alec Ryder included, except for the children Riders, as many as 4 people. It is approved in the milky Way a team of 6 people - and where had place the PP on the Storm? Even a 1 doctor, the remaining 5 landing. Team Rider in the end and had to be anywhere.
And do not say that the ship for science: one laboratory's Deputy Pioneer cultivates roses, the other is not clear at all who lives.
Spoilers about Storms I would like to add. It seems to me absolutely illogical the lack of landing of the Shuttle on the research vessel. Who foolishly jumping on an uncharted planet, the risk of losing the ship? In the trilogy where all you have to do is decided: arrived, went into orbit, Shep's team on the Shuttle had landed and did business. But here ? such a fool is not always put... the idea is - in addition to the regular Shuttle and Rover on the Storm was SUPPOSED to be at least one heavy SCAF . the type that, in which Shep dived for a visit, We must be ready for any environment.. Imagine how cool it would be to Voelde to dive under the ice and observe the relic beasts...
EMPs wrote:
The wheel is one of the fundamental inventions, to say that Mako is such that it was not them - at least what you wrote.
The wheel is a Prime example, when there is a working scheme, which is a pseudo-decides to change, because he know better how it works than everyone else.
And Yes, Mako, even when moving on rough terrain is not better than the nomad. The one without a huge speed up even a little hill will not climb. And jumping Mako above.
Z126 wrote:
There almost half of the planets have KHETY
Which we knew/, carrying a Nomad with our system?
Z126 wrote:
here it is good DLC
About which we know nothing, because he traveled the same everywhere. Usersystem? Yes, even with the code not converge.
Z126 wrote:
why is this misunderstanding need weapons
What does the why to why not? Say it again - you're comparing army BMP with a civilian vehicle, the difference is not visible at all? Let's megaloytes that the car You bought, not the machine gun set.OMG
Useless to argue with those who even can not understand.
The fact that you have all the habit to shoot, climbs (with it losing the experience) - your problems, and habits - even the difference between the types of equipment not to notice. Kazualschinoy that everyone complained about - smell, if that.
Mako is the girl from Pacific rim
Mako Mori (Mako Mori) - curator of the program of recovery of the 3 series Rangers Pacific defense corps, the Jaeger pilot Maverick, the adopted daughter of Marshal Pentecost.
Honestly, still don't understand how the writers think. Than explained the logic of the settlers. Like, fly to another galaxy, where most likely full of unknown dangers, and what the main reconnaissance unit of the gun for transport, what could possibly go wrong?
AlexeyMC wrote:what could go wrong?
Faster the question how the players play, not opening his eyes, Who said that a Nomad for them? He was a research base, we just took it.
Hammer a little planning, but little armor, the name is not in character and missiles lungs.
EMPs
EMPs wrote:
Which we knew/, carrying a Nomad with our system?
I wrote we fly to Andromeda 600 years during this time it could accommodate those who will not welcome guests from the milky way and burn them to the ground .
EMPs wrote:
About which we know nothing, because he traveled the same everywhere. Usersystem? Yes, even with the code not converge.
What ? The very existence of Mako shows that there is a normal system DLC.
EMPs wrote:
Say it again - you're comparing army BMP with a civilian vehicle, the difference is not visible at all?
Again I say that no one bothered to set the weapon on the nomad. Armor Pioneer and relicts developed only for him. The pioneer is a very important man , is it so difficult to improve the little Nomad for him? Just do not say they are busy with other more important things . Pioneer prepares for them the planet , solves problems with Khatami , but these slobs can't set it up at the nomad at least some weapons? Not only is the place a normal research ship we got a yacht , we were even given some kind of SUV is done in the smallest mound.
EMPs wrote:
Faster the question how the players play, not opening his eyes, Who said that a Nomad for them? He was a research base, we just took it.
Again, who prevented him to improve ?
EMPs wrote:
Let's megaloytes that the car You bought, not the machine gun set.OMG
Found something to compare . Am I on your food every day on the planet full of chatov?
EMPs wrote:
Useless to argue with those who even can not understand.
And from this I hear? From the one who explains the plot holes in the other holes in the plot ? Vengeance from the one who started to defend lazy developers ? From the one who can't understand that there is no reason not to install it on the nomad weapons?
AlexeyMC wrote:
Than explained the logic of the settlers. Like, fly to another galaxy, where most likely full of unknown dangers, and what the main reconnaissance unit of the gun for transport, what could possibly go wrong?
They do not explain.
EMPs
Dragged from another galaxy transport, which is not intended to dangerous places, while, as even in the last parts all transports were armed. Despite the fact that the lack of weapons is not experienced. And there is no difference, we dragged, or someone, just the fact that flying to who knows where, fleeing from a terrifying menace didn't even take the car with a machine gun, with everything...
Mako at least could shoot,unlike the Nomad, the Hammer generally tightened in the form of dull DLC,but Kochevnik unfortunately only good for that would travel long distances,although the absence of weapons is surprising,because who knows what may come of unexplored planets,but in fact,what wonder such schools exist in all developers.
Z126 wrote:which hard drives into the little hill
have not tried the mode change?lol
Z126 wrote:Found something to compare
Yes, noshell. Because in fact it is. You forgot who is/was at the head of the expedition? Civil, scientist call it what you want. Pioneer is purely for emergency conditions and situations that happened. THE EXPEDITION WAS TO COLONIZE, BUT NOT THE WAR. It is difficult to even the first minute of the game to see?
Z126 wrote:From the one who explains the plot holes in the other holes in the plot
Yeah, the hole. Then we rubbed THIS STUDY, this HOLE - after all weaned from this, give them only shooters.
And to me it says the one who in the beginning said that the subject for expression of opinions and not arguments, and even goes to the person? Oh?
EMPs
By the way about that shit.
Together this stupidity with regimes that clearly has structural features that affect the weight of the cars, could the gun and privacity. And it would be two variants of the car. Combat and exploration.
AlexeyMC wrote: not designed for hazardous locations
Another true comment? It is designed for hazardous environments. Only here sparkle, your whole company, not able to understand that the danger comes not only from the living world - there are a lot of other kinds of danger, from which the Nomad is protected.