Impressions of the game (Company of Heroes 2)
The game became more recall - behind enemy linesI liked the game. And as they say the taste and color of comrades there. Everyone has their own opinion. And we need to respect it.
Kirici
I do it in the first part of the play. in Opposing Fronts. So I have something to compare. Tales of Valor missed anything new it has not seen. I first part like this very much.
AK102
Sleep 1 I like it too,though Sega completely blew him off, but with a Sleep 2 clearly something is wrong ;)
SAUSAGES - crazy subhuman. these are the people once, all intellectuals were killed. got up and now ruled us for a century soon.
So as the movies show where the Russian NKVD put bundles of people at the wall is normal , but when it shows the game in another country is already a article Limited only for Russia for the rest of the left happy :) ? .
I like playing and playing. Generation of deer is growing , one is piss and the others ran after him not even thinking why.
Write the petition that would be in the country banned all games where there is a Russian. Absolutely , this is the same article Against Mikhalkov too.
z.s the majority of people who signed the petition even its not that were not, and have not even seen , what can we say about such people ? culturally ..... nothing . Zombies do not have the will and opinions , and living only a stranger. First pass the game to the end , and then say how the soldier show . In the game just have the valor of ordinary soldiers.
Eryri in the first part of the game shows war crimes of the American army? why? what do You think?
p.s.: I kollektsionka license. campaign I passed and I did not like it. I play mostly in the cartoon
Yevgeny Zimin, for http://ru.twitch.tv/ there is an online stream of this game.
watch the game live, and there really decide
It seems to me that in this game only showed that the Russian barbarians and the Nazis the good soldiers
They didn't show that the Nazis did mass executions, burned people alive, tortured etc
Erick Hartman
The scoop is the same as Nazi Germany
To equate the Soviet Union and the Third Reich - is ugly, immoral attempt to rewrite and distort history. Yes, it is possible to compare the Third Reich and the Soviet Union as the bandit and the Sheriff in the Wild West. And that, and you have both the Colt and use it at every opportunity. Question: for what? One fights in order for the corpse of his opponent to throw in the crematorium, his family - to kill and make them soap, house - destroying, and in its place to dig a pond and let go to splash Karpov. And his family supports him, because I already can smell the trophies. They both receive support from their families, and both punish them for disobedience: See - war. I fight for you!. Another, too not sugar. But what will he do? And he the house of your enemy will rebuild to your liking, the widow will give the wife of his brother, the land will unite with her, because he feels that the tractor is more profitable to cultivate than the two small, and without a father the children he adopts and they will be full members of his family.
And what about the myth about the rape of Germany, I can only say one thing: after what the Germans have done here, the soldiers of the red Army had the MORAL RIGHT to do the same in Germany. But orders from above it's very harshly punished. Here Stalin's order of January 19, 1945: Officers and soldiers! We go to the country of the enemy. Each must keep his temper, everyone should be brave...the Remaining population in the conquered areas, regardless of whether German, Czech, whether, whether Polish, should not be subjected to violence. The guilty will be punished according to the laws of war. On the conquered soil is not allowed sexual relations with women. For violence and rape, the perpetrators will be shot.
And here's another document: "the Directive of the Supreme command
the commander of troops and members of military councils
Of the 1st Byelorussian and the 1st Ukrainian fronts on change
attitude to German pow and civilian population
20 APR 1945
GHQ orders:
1. Demand to change the attitude of the Germans as prisoners of war and civilians. Contact with the Germans better. Cruel treatment of the Germans causes in them fear and makes them hard to resist, not surrender in a captivity. The civilian population, fearing reprisals, organized in gangs. This situation is unprofitable for us. More humane attitude towards the Germans will facilitate our combat operations in their territory and, undoubtedly, will reduce the persistence of the Germans in defense.
2. In the areas of Germany West of the line of the mouth of the river Oder, Furstenberg, on the Neisse river (West) to create the German administration, and in the cities to put burgomasters — the Germans. Members of the national socialist party, if they are loyal to the red army, not to touch, and to detain only the leaders, if they do not have time to escape.
3. Improvement of relations with the Germans should not lead to a decrease of vigilance and familiarity with the Germans.
GHQ.
STALIN
ANTONOV
In the comments, I hope these two documents are not needed. But it's worked for the order? Here is what Isaak Kobylyansky, who commanded during the war artzoom: Shortly after taking East Prussia, we were acquainted with the order, condemning violence against the civilian population, especially women, and looting. The order was said about the strict penalties that will be subjected violators. I don't recall any meetings of the Tribunal, arrests or razzhalovan in our division. But the order itself was a strong deterrent. In my immediate surroundings, and two or three hundred people, the order is not violated. Among us were not notorious rapists. It would be naive to say that nobody anywhere has not violated this order. But, I stress, open violations of the order of mass violence against German women was not.
And used the sentences in this order in practice? According to Professor RAS Oleg Rzheshevskiy, head of the Department of history of wars and geopolitics of the history of the wars of the XX century, for atrocities committed against the local population were convicted by military tribunals 4148 officers and a large number of privates. A few show trials of military personnel resulted in the imposition of the death penalty. As an illustration, will bring memories of V. P. Bryukhov, who cites Miroslava Berdnik in his article the den of the beast, or once again about raped Germany. V. P. bryukhov recalls an occasion when one of the officers of his regiment, together with the mechanic of his tank tried to rape a Romanian girl, and when she tried to escape, shot her: the next day I come her parents with the local authorities to our team. And the day after authorities spotted them and took the SMERSH worked well. Ivanov immediately confessed that he shot, but he did not realize that I did. On the third day of the trial. In a clearing he built the whole team, brought the mayor and his father and mother. The mechanic wept bitterly. Ivanov, he says, Hey, be a man. You wouldn't get shot, nothing sentimental. Send to a penal battalion — redeem by the blood. When he was given the last word, he asked for forgiveness. And so it happened — was given twenty-five years with the replacement of the penal battalions. The Lieutenant stood up and said: Citizens courts-Martial, I have committed and I ask no mercy not to do. So simply and firmly. Sat and sits a blade of grass in his teeth picks. The verdict: Shot down the line. To build a team. Sentence to be carried. We were built fifteen minutes and twenty. Failed convict to a pre-dug grave. Brigade NKVD Lieutenant Colonel, says our battalion NKVD, standing in the ranks of the brigade: Comrade Morozov, the sentence to be carried. He can not leave. I command you! He stands, not out. Then the Colonel ran up to him, grabs the hand, pulls down and through clenched teeth mate: I command you!! He went. Went to the convict. Lieutenant Ivanov took off his cap, bowed, said: Forgive me, brothers. And that's all. Morozov said to him: kneel. He said it very quietly, but all could hear was an eerie silence. Knelt down, the cap folded over a belt: head down. And when he tilted his head, the NKVD shot him in the head. The body of the Lieutenant fell down and convulses. It was so creepy.... The NKVD turned and went from the gun the smoke goes, and he goes reeling like a drunk. The Colonel shouts: Control! Control! He hears nothing, goes. Then he jumps up, once, once.
What I remember, after each shot, dead he was, and still trembled. He the body with his foot pushed it slid into the grave: Bury. Buried. Ah! Within fifteen minutes, no one disagreed. Dead silence. He fought great, respected him, knew that the Romanians had burned his family. It could in fact indulgence to ask, to say that by chance, no.... After that, no incidents with the local population we have in the brigade was not.
The Game Is Great. Great mechanics, great produmano and debugged. Not for the faint of heart. I haven't had this much fun since the wahi. The plot is also excellent.
Typical disadvantages of this strategy:
1. Unrealistic shootout taking place at too close range and the shooting bots in the open, what manifests itself partial ungovernability of artificial intelligence(hereafter, Bud. ex:. AI) in this game;
2. Not developed the same time as the implementation of a successful attack...;
3. Not thought out indication of visibility when shooting bots from shelters.
The chart claims to have.
sph812
1. Decides the range of review and type of weapon. If you for some reason highlight a large area - the infantry, occupying the defense, to open fire on the enemy before. If you attack the squad will be constantly moving towards the enemy and crumble (AI trained so probably in order under a grenade or Molotov to get together).
The Germans Geber in high-rise building shoot (read - see, and therefore shoot) a lot more than one storey. Thus Geber in the attack is not so effective because, again, short range review.
In a snowstorm reduced visibility is critical because of its use solely for deployment of troops on previously explored frontiers for further attacks.
Mordok wrote: the AI is probably so trained in order to under a grenade or Molotov to get the crowd
In any case, the game should be handling, not to run the program AI unknown what rules without knowing about them player and independently. Do not confuse the tactics of warfare and its implementation in the game.