3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
K
Kirik_LaL 02.01.20 08:48 pm

The difference between scaling and custom resolution? (Red Dead Redemption 2)

Type if resolution is set to 2048х1152 scaled 1.25, we get 2K... so not easier to just put a custom 2K? Will there be any difference in the picture?
(monitor fhd)
13 Comments
Sort by:
L
Lodurr 02.01.20

Will not, but the VRAM in the settings will ask for more because optimize through ******.. well, you ponil. )

l
legusor 02.01.20

if we talk about nvidia, the difference between the custom resolution and DSR will be in favor of the first, since DSR pales the picture even with a zero value, DSR-smoothness.
I three times already in detail painted in the comparisons, features, advantages and disadvantages on this topic. somewhere you can even stumble.
between 1920x1080 and 2048х1152 won't make a difference, but 2560x1440 will already be noticeable in the eyes. QHD as the minimum compensation for playing without anti-aliasing. and Yes, apskeyl at basic 1920x1080 higher than 3840x2160 in terms of quality will have the opposite effect.

K
Kirik_LaL 02.01.20

legusor
I'm the type that figures if you put 2048х1152 and the in-game scaling to 1.25 it turns out put 2560x1440...
So it better so the picture will be than just to set a custom 2560x1440?

D
Dogmit 02.01.20

Kirik_LaL
Type if resolution is set to 2048х1152 scaled 1.25, we get 2K... so not easier to just put a custom 2K? Will there be any difference in the picture?
(monitor fhd)

Isn't it easier to buy a normal 2K or 4K monitor instead of sitting on outdated full hd?

L
Lex-one 02.01.20

Kirik_LaL
No, the picture is no better.
Maybe worse, since the screen resolution is not native.
The number of pixels will remain the same.

K
Kirik_LaL 02.01.20

Dogma
Well damn... Now there is no money, there will be money to buy.
A soap inconvenience right now so struggle in the way that is -_-
Yes and not all games are compatible so jackals picture... In the subway and devil may cry 5 developer.

L
LeHaMvP007 02.01.20

Kirik_LaL
tried to choose between 1.25 and 2560x1440, for me the same)

L
Lex-one 05.04.21

Dogmeet
Dogmeet wrote:
Clarity is obtained by anti-aliasing, not by increasing the pixel density.
What difference does it make if the result is the same?
Tiktotayou124
Since you told him something was wrong and you've
Tiktotayou124 wrote
pohuistichen

L
Lex-one 05.04.21

Dogmeet
Doway, bet, we'll take rdr 2, 4 k monique and full hd with upscale up to 4 k.
And let's see the difference.

T
Tiktotayou124 05.04.21

Lex-one
It shouldn't actually be, if the two monics are not of different diagonals

L
Lex-one 05.04.21

Dogmeet
I have 4k by 55 inches.
and Full hd by 27 inches with 240 hertz.
I know what I'm talking about.
Tiktotayou124
Depends on the distance.
Of course, in dense at 55 inches in 4k, you can see pixels, unlike 27, at the same distance, but it depends on how close your head is to the monitor.
Everything is subjective and everyone must choose the system for themselves.
And not to write what he does not know / did not see.

k
koltos17 05.04.21

legusor
Maybe in-game scaling is more honorable, although the feeling is as if sharpness is overestimated, so DSR works much better. A small soap from TAA remains. But the textures in 4K resolution become only the blind will not see it.

U
Uelma 05.04.21

The most noticeable difference is the long shot. It becomes clear. Textures are corny loaded, and not soapy. But requires a good 30 series card or 1080ti