3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
T
Temnoe_Solnce 18.01.20 09:06 pm

The ideological Department of paganotti

Tamez such.
As you know, the population likes to ascribe various doctrines and what these doctrines imply. As a rule, negative. This is done, of course, not just so, and under the influence of propaganda. All. Commies, liberastov, Nazis and other scum. As a result, the cattle running in terror just from the name of the doctrine. An anarchist? Oh, my God! You rock the car and want to have things in Afghanistan!, "The Communists! They want to subordinate the production of the plan are to make!. Paganotti there are plenty of narrow-minded, viceroyship such things. The purpose of the activities of this Department, of course, in educating the public. Stop the ignorance at the root. The next - the topic comes the Professor and puts that has one or the other doctrine. Especially we should dwell on stereotypes. Just links to Wikipedia - not allowed. Of course, we can't afford a long discussion the next lecture right here in the topic. Just a quick questions. And brief answers. And a little bit. If you really want and it was all very controversial - create a separate topic.

_ _ _
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Черная_легенда
Here is something similar. In relation to the phenomena of reality.
83 Comments
Sort by:
P
Patriot PG 18.01.20

Egor_Pskov
When Regan lived in Lyubertsy.Long gone now,and the remake laziness.

A
Ankh 8 18.01.20

My personal opinion that in vain is prohibited. I even studied in a school and to publish it only with comments of experts. That would be almost naive to visually see what some ideas can lead. And then stir in the plain created. A very good idea of the personality of Hitler, and gives the Genesis of the whole system of Nazism.

A
Ankh 8 18.01.20

zordexiz
So that should explain that sometimes the naivety is worse than stealing it. And that utopian ideas are quite realistic piles of corpses can be formed. And most importantly, if you are around all is not well, not everyone who cries about it - a decent man and that life will improve.

A
Ankh 8 18.01.20

zordexiz
Any better than it works now. In the USSR still okay, but these restrictions are ridiculous:any climbs in an Internet and swings as he wants. And how he'll understand - Fig knows.

P
Patriot PG 18.01.20

zordexiz
Mein Kampf does not affect the choice of ideology.Checked on personal experience.

Y
Yury95 18.01.20

There were supporters of United Russia and those who are against the USSR, the CPSU and the entire Soviet?

S
SUSUL1 18.01.20

Deserticola
How many letters!
And like all one-sided.
Except for Stalin you see other political figures do not know, not interested in the political situation within the party, is not interested in how Stalin was at his post?
In your turns out that Stalin as the Messiah entered the Kremlin and immediately began to do their outrages! The same Khrushchev on the attributed hit list because I wanted to sit in his cresli and showed all of the party the fight with spies

Before you document resolution shoot 2000 man, that's the only one who made it came to you and gave you the gun , they say sign it... Who is greatest among you is a maniac?
To sojaleniu people hayuschih Stalin, Khrushchev and Gorbachev almost never interested in domestic policy at the time of making key decisions. And if you dig deeper, it climbs well, not very nice things. And I have to admit that the red army won, but it was headed by the maniacs, thieves, scammers and other jerks that his speeches introduced not experienced in politics people astray, to achieve their goals.
Stalin went out of them, he climbed over them and forced them to be smiriti and deal with Affairs of state, not their personal. He was the first party has expressed interest in strengthening of the USSR. He proved himself a skillful diplomat and a strong leader.
In fact, he re-established the government from the pile of soft shit)


And then you can agree to that, Christ was the first Nazi

s
stalker7162534 18.01.20

W
Wild Rider 18.01.20

stalker7162534
A good writer. Razor is not read, but the hour of the Ox - I then close.

s
stalker7162534 18.01.20

People, stop confusing "normal" and "good"!

Normal is what most people do.

Most work in offices, has forgotten higher education, wear clothes of size M, loves people of the opposite sex, watching soap operas in the evenings.

It is abnormal to be a genius.

It is abnormal to be (censored).

It is abnormal to be thin.

Not normal to be fat.

It is abnormal to be tatuirovannykh and with purple hair.

Not normal in the evenings to paint portraits.

It is abnormal to understand cold fusion.

Just because these people are in the minority. But that doesn't mean it's bad. This is absolutely not related concepts.

The majority, refrain from all sorts of abnormal: they absolutely do not want you to meet.

Minority, stop to persuade the majority to accept you as the norm — plucked only to aggression. Live with their choice and stop writing petitions to the President of the company "Disney".

W
Wing42 18.01.20

stalker7162534
So what is the cause of your unusual. You are like most, your physically felt, wanting to be someone else is no longer for me any mystery.
And certainly I have no right to condemn you for your choice, even if it results in such theatrical and working the audience things like writing provocative messages or downloading equally provocative images. So who sets the bar as yourself, there is nothing you can do about it.
Sorry, the singularity has also become a fashion victim. Like you have a lot, and they all have some special detail, an obsession or a kind of fetishism. All it serves its purpose - to show others that this person is not a cog in the mechanism and not a grain of sand at the mill. What he morally or intellectually rises above the normal people and seems to be something greater than it really is.
However, I experience some... irritation, when a person exposes his the singularity show, like it considers the highest human virtue, world achievement or just something that you can certainly be proud of, ordinary people are jealous of him.

s
stalker7162534 18.01.20

Understandable to our contemporaries, lashed out at the fan was first used by "Westerners" and "Slavophiles" in the mid-nineteenth century. At about this time and became a significant other, extremely phimosis-patrioticheskaya point of view about the Way™. However, paradoxically, the idea of His Special Way — not a unique invention, generated by the minds of the Slavophiles, and the study of the works of the German philosophers of the classics. By the way, the phrase a Particular Path is not translated with the meaning of any one European language except German Sonderweg. The majority of the throw of this fact, patients try to ignore.

g
grafonoman 18.01.20

mnogabukav sure it's not worth it

s
stalker7162534 18.01.20

A
A.Soldier of Light 18.01.20

Deserticola wrote:
Any attempt to point to numerous sources, from which it follows that in 37-38 years. for political reasons it was shot 682 thousand people also bring only a fierce anger and a howl like well, we're preparing for war!.
In Russia now is likely to gain as many supporters of Navalny and failure, and other swamp creatures. In fact, the same. The fifth column of pricks who hate their country and not seeing beyond his nose. Putin they blame... They're the lucky ones, not people like Stalin at the helm, otherwise it would be the same as under Stalin )) Although probably not, now is the time more. Internet, international Convention and all that...
Were killed or deported to the camps many criminals. I would even say, in our time, not only in Russia but also worldwide, it would be useful to conduct similar sweeps in society. To rid society of criminals once and for all, and then to carry out competently composed of positive propaganda in schools, and so on, everywhere. No cult of personality, of course - all this bullshit in the past. Educated population, strong and healthy (body and spirit) with common goals, and the people he governs the power structure, making security checks (and they are legally justified and spelled out) - that's where you need to go. A strong leader of the state are perfectly able to contribute to it. But to begin with - the repression of corrupt officials and cleaning (total!) of the entire System. Without a strong leader does.

Yury95 wrote:
There were supporters of United Russia and those who are against the USSR, the CPSU and the entire Soviet?
Weird. Is unified Russia against the Soviet? The Communist party, but Edro why are you suddenly against it?

stalker7162534 wrote:
Minority, stop to persuade the majority to accept you as the norm — plucked only to aggression.
The rare case of full agreement with the written by an old friend of the Pro-Western 8)

Patriot NG wrote:
Mein Kampf does not affect the choice of ideology.Checked on personal experience.
You have a level of intelligence so high enough, and the worldview its already there. About all this is not to say, suggestible fully in the world, alas. Especially among the young. Or Vice versa: the elderly (old Soviet nation, which has now for 60 years at least)...

i
ihappy 18.01.20

Deserticola wrote:
The figure of 800 thousand killed for nothing
Kick. So, said nizachto and Stalin was bad.
But as you begin to dig the Affairs of these innocent victims, so the hair to fall out.
He killed, he stole and iza this extinct village, the bridge burned, the Communists killed... etc
All of these innocent victims. Yes, the cases are not read, everything is fabricated.
Convenient for unintelligent.
And also the fools, the cult of personality developed 100%.
They believe that all the troubles to blame one person. Namely Stalin. There was no one else who the country I drove. Were not on the ground of idiots. There were no errors.
All only Stalin and only Stalin.

What are these stupid tire.

s
stalker7162534 18.01.20

Deserticola wrote:
. With the exception of the digits in 799 thousand shot in the 58th article, which was published at the initiative of Khrushchev.
Legend has it that Khrushchev demanded that the Cheka help how many shot. From the Cheka came the reply. Where is the guarantee that this number is correct? Question - how quickly a response was received? How much time would need to collect information about the total number? I doubt that the Cheka collected data and how much we shot just for today?.
And generally with Khrushchev and figures by him (or in his time) it's pretty hazy. It is said that when Khrushchev met with Eisenhower, he asked him what losses were suffered by the USSR during WWII?, the not knowing absolutely, even approximately - as the commies were on the drum how many people die of prehistory (the commies claimed that the history of mankind begins only with the beginning of Communism, and the rest is prehistory), and then Khrushchev blurted out from the bulldozer - 20 million.
If you recall the last shots of the movie Release, which is misleading in the number of dead people in different countries - you can see the amazing - in other countries the death toll is reported with a precision of units, and the USSR 20 million.

Those who FAP whiskered Highlander, echo causes butthurt when people talk about tortured to death, and executed in Soviet concentration camps. As has been said:
Spoilerpicture of the political world order they have in mind are usually one-dimensional in one axis. On the one hand they, the patriots, Stalinists, and the other traitors-liberasty. So as soon as you say something against Stalin , immediately will be added to the "kasparysham". Then you will begin to tease "hundreds of millions of people eaten for dinner by Stalin personally". It somehow seems very witty and fun, and in any discussion with them sure POPs up a standard hitting. If you have pallavam even mention the victims of the regime, you will immediately be credited with the idea of "the tens, hundreds of millions of victims" and will be for a long time together to savor it and laugh. Stalinists love to argue with the imagination of the stupid liberas. That is, men in my head.

G
Gauguin 18.01.20

Fascism is well described, everything on the shelves, without prejudice and snot. The best ideology.

A
A.Soldier of Light 18.01.20

Gauguin wrote:
Fascism is well described, everything on the shelves, without prejudice and snot. The best ideology.
Quoted from wiki:
Fascism (ital. fascismo, from fascio "Union beam bunch Association") — the generalized name extremely right political movements, ideologies and the corresponding form of government dictatorial type, the characteristics of which are called militaristic nationalism (in the broadest sense), anti-liberalism, xenophobia, revanchism and chauvinism, anti-communism, the cult of the leader, contempt for electoral democracy and liberalism, belief in the rule of the elites and the natural social hierarchy, statism, and, in some cases, syndicalism, racism and genocide.
So what exactly do you mean and what is described approve of fascism? 8)
The absence of elections, the genocide of dissent, the hatred of different races, the exaltation of the rich over the poor? Thank you ))

G
Gauguin 18.01.20

A. Soldier of Light
Link to Wikipedia - not the best idea, but still:
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
anti-liberalism, xenophobia, anti-communism, the cult of the leader, contempt for electoral democracy and liberalism, belief in the rule of the elites and the natural social hierarchy
I see these only good. Believe me, such a society will be much healthier liberal for the more noble and realistic view of things.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
The absence of elections
that never had and never will benefit. Moreover, open secret - and now they do not. Anywhere.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
the genocide of dissenters
No, of course not. But the right to stupidity that liberalism is a sacred cow should be limited to basic censorship.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
hatred of different races
Not hate. Rather, recognizing the reality of racial differences without any emotional coloring.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
the glorification of the wealthy over the poor?
Rather, the exaltation of noble, intelligent, spiritual, and cultural people over stupid cattle. And it's not arrogance, not a label smatterers and a necessary measure. After all, if people who have base animal sinful nature took over to give the right to vote, then they understandably will shout the loudest and will soon establish their own rules that would be disastrous for society as a whole. In the end we get...something like a modern Western civilization.

P. S. to Continue, please click on the button reply to me came alert. I hope the difference in dates between this post and your creation will be.