Impressions of the game (Battlefield 1)
Myself.Campaign.
The cat scene is beautiful. It is not even subject to discussion. Just tried as follows.
That alone is worth the time of vykrutka on Ultra in the second story mission. Just great graphics. Music is one of the best.
In General, impressions are more than good. Think this design is one of the highest quality for the last time.
Spoiler Multiplayer.
Quite fun and dynamic. Compared to BT felt in team fights. (Basically right now ur at the doctors)
Added a huge amount of content and technology. Various modifications for weapons and equipment. Location in my vzgyad worked perfectly.
At the moment, all very happy, especially the company.
Optimization = Frostbite
My early verdict: 9.0
There are some latency issues when connecting to servers.
Hippos too strong, completely unable to change the course of battle for a short period of time, creating a nasty imbalance.
starting with battlefield hardline 2015 cold and actually scored on them,the plot is a loner shit,purely multiplayer-nerd game,nothing more.
p.s. The engine of the game is OFC a masterpiece,probably the best on the market-awesome picture with optimization,a very rare combination.
the best game in its genre, not suitable for lovers of dissent, they enrage all classes of units except for the attack it's completely sick people can only play if gather in large groups mostly on the weekends in the afternoon telling them where to go and 32 of the down run from point to point in a straight line if you get on this server go spoil your impression of the game to let them run themselves! these bad people and those who organize them spoil the game experience more than cheaters, they consider themselves the elite! complete degradation of the intellect zero. do not mess with them and you will become like them. one by one they are full boots. if you do play shooters and are prepared to change the strategy of fighting constantly and are willing to suffer the first defeat of the 50 hours is going to play! but if you like to sleep at the computer then don't try to play it don't! there are other games!
Battlefield 3:
The multiplayer I really enjoyed it (especially the fact that the aircraft returned and the cards are very chic) and I joined him 670 hours somewhere (though 100 level and did not inject). DLC by the way is also very cool was.
The plot I also basically liked it (although it copied the mechanics of Call of Duty did not like).
Battlefield 4:
The multiplayer I loved, but this time I played 378 hours, but this is due to the fact that I started very late play (in fact probably where that 1 year after release of the game, if not more) because the computer was so-so and the new part has not attracted as updated and started playing. DLC will not say that much, some less, but most of it yourself.
The story I didn't like feeling like the developers tried only 1st mission, then spat and made so fine.
Battlefield 1:
Multiplayer I did not like at all. Why? Well, firstly this is not the First World War clearly, all run either with guns or with machine guns or semi-automatic rifles that bend over anything and everything, like it or not a lot of authenticity? Type run with boltovskoy? But tuna suck, you will make everything. + Everything tightened gadgets for weapons, red dot sights, silencers, vertical handle every second of the barrel, what is it pancake? What is this nonsense? Okay this whole circus would have to bear if the weapons were balanced, because it is not balanced, for example a semi-auto rifle win bytovki due to rate of fire and suppression, you may have time to make the shot, but you still get killed because you get hit the bullet will inhibit you from causing accuracy to deteriorate, and then you will finish because the semi-automatic firing shot after shot with no drop in the accuracy and mild recoil. Machines too you quickly take out, of course from a distance to kill them it is impossible, but on average with no problems perestraivat bytovki same. The machine guns too and machines, only damage above and shop more. And Yes of course you can take the gunner or medic, but I'm not interested to run in the setting of the First World with the semi-automatic which was not then, not interested to run with all sorts of prototype machine and other garbage that ponapihali the game, but I'm not against the fact that she was here if the balance were normal. I'm not going to say anything about the technique, because it is surprisingly done very well, apparently this is all trying to drive on it, but not to run on foot. Other aspects of the game like the maps are way too well done and to say also not desirable, because all the spoils that balance which completely kills interest in the game, and indeed the First World War, this is more like Battlefield 4, only with textures 1918, here only it is not to face. If you would like to do customization, would have done our time, or at least a cold war 80-90-ies, but no, we'd better ispohabil the First World, it was boldly and unexpectedly that BF is gone, but all realized it is silly. Yes, and the unpopularity of the game clearly says that Battlefield 4, 3 years maintain active and even after the last DLC came out, developers are riveting cards separately and the weapon was added slowly, even Battlelog was removed and the usual menu was removed which by the way is bad, because implemented internal menu is very bad. Battlelog was much better and less buggy, and besides, while sitting in the queue quietly to sit on the Internet, there is need to minimize the game to do this. And Battlefield 1 latest DLC came out and everything about the game essentially forgot, well, Battlefield V on the way.
The plot also did not like at all at first that it is for the bits of each character in the 40 minutes of plot that is made very qualitatively, because the war in this game at all in any way is not felt, one on the tank chase, one of the fortress stormed, then one of the outposts and stormed the train armored Prem, all alone and maybe there you found a couple of people allies, but that looks nothing like the First World War where only the Russian Empire sent 12 million soldiers, Britain sent almost 9 million people France 8.6 million people and so the list goes on, but in the game you're doing one in fact. I would also like to mention the air mission in the game, because I don't know why, but the physics of flight they fuck up completely, there would just pick up and move with the multiplayer, the developers made some stupid arkadina where even a loop can be done, it's a wild minus the game part of the story. And all these attempts to make type interesting stories of different people again because of the implementation turned out to be disastrous, turned out well only to end this obscurantism and the trailer of the story mode of the game.
The result:
Lucky for the New year did skid 50% on Titanfall Battlefield 1 and 2 and spent only 1000 rubles for the game and the second bought, at the price normal, and by the way Titanfall 2, I passed the story is a good guy, but then finally decided to play multiplayer and the game very much, it is a pity that he died very quickly due to not a very good time to release Titanfall 2 probably much more deserving of praise than Battlefield 1 when the first trailer. And by the way about the battle Call of Duty vs. Battlefield, trailer IW of course picked up a bunch of dislikes allowed, but the game was much better than BF, at least in terms of plot. 6\10 from me for a good technical component of the game. I'm still trying to play it, but every year all becomes worse, before the release at least game was on ultra at 40 FPS, despite the fact that then my graphics card was AMD R7 265X 2 GB, and now the GTI 1050 Ti with 4 GB, the game on the same ultra goes to 30 FPS with constant drop to 15 and that's normal anyway?
I did not like the game.That's what I understand the multiplayer to play with friends or with dad.But why make a game without a story mode.Yes he is, and takes 10 minutes.What gives multiplayer cheaters,pituh, etc bottom line:the Game did not like(((V Battledield also probably will not surprise you.
Just make a reservation - it's about the story and about her, because the more I do in games is not interested.
Despite the fact that Battle is known first as a multiplayer shooter (and sometimes flying and ezdilka, etc.) with plenty of destructible everything it has a place and is quite strong, not for show, the storyline of the company. The next part is no exception, though the approach has changed. Now, instead of the whole storyline we are waiting for the war stories from different fronts of the First world, that is, six independent from each other stories at the 2-4 level. This approach is quite justified because it turned out extremely diverse, with diverse characters and his style somewhere adventurous, somewhere drama, somewhere, heroism, etc. There are missions with stealth, a ride on a tank and flying on airplanes. All very nice and epic, in the spirit of Battle and is equipped with a simply chic videos.
In General, another great shooter for 8-10 hours (if you play carefully, with the achievements and challenges) to once again leave with the nose of Call of Duty. :)
8,5/10
bought on sale for $ 100 and really regretted it! not even worth that kind of money. Really the worst part of the battle to date, that leaves бф5 and most likely, the pedestal will take it. This is not a battlefield, and Doom wrapper in the first world.
Russian_Lawyer
Tavarisch srulik after reading your comments you about the BFV is of the same opinion.
Forget about Call of Duty, Battlefield why do you need it.
It's like Counter-Strike, the game has its own community, and others who critise care.
If you to this community does not think so go ......
BezNika1
I this community has always been treated, little you can see my comments read, but about бф5..... about her of the same opinion, even those who liked бф1))))) about it, and can not have another opinion. Here in call of duty I just do not happen because not playing it since 2007, and angry comments there, not leaving, because do not care for it. And here contend, because the series was killed.
A good toy in the setting of the First World War and not a typical jester who is already tired of everyone, where only the near future is shown and you run along the walls in an exoskeleton as if you were stung in the ass. The player is allowed to play 5 stories, not counting the prologue, where you play only 10 minutes, the whole game is played for 4 hours if you play slowly. They give you a ride on various vehicles, fly on airplanes (the control of the aircraft on the gamepad is just terrible), ride horses and the choice of weapons is not bad here. But even here there are disadvantages, namely short 40-minute stories with characters which you really do not have time to empathize with, with the exception of 2-3 Persians who are forgotten immediately after a complete passage.