Games support 3D

You infa years 2000 and the beginning. And buying a TV at that time for $ 1,000 is not relevant. Having a display of the time, it is even claimed to be a budget version. Believe or even read about the displays more good quality. Especially at the moment.

Maxim Ovchinnikov
http://projectorworld.ru/blog/793.html (2017)
http://mylcd.info/model/rgb.html - we are talking about 4K with a horse's price tag and the raw technology (just standard).
And that's how things are actually https://www.ferra.ru/ru/tv/review/tv-marketing-bullshit-shall-not-pass-part-2/
Please knock proof about a super-duper rendition of the telly, preferably with konkretnymi models. And then can't find a color TV no this Rec. 2020 (Ultra HD), don't even write the number of colors in the characteristics of the telly.
And don't forget that there is in selling professional monitors with a color gamut more than Adobe RGB (to work with photos, video content and design). Telly is under development.
And all are available for purchase of mass technique is far from these standards of colour rendering index (consumer goods).

What are you settings in the TriDef 3D exposed to AMD worked?

Ryazancev
The TVs support both long range, even my ancient 7000D, do not rush to the first article written by or sucked from where is not clear. There are many nuances. Watching television has long been the technology went much wider than the narrow range monitors. Then minus one, and a lot of nuances of incompatibilities of resolution, and so on down the chain, everyone is faced with their problems, but all custom. I'm not talking that long ago TV image additionally is passed through their system. If you have a better picture on the monitor, please, I'm not saying the monitors are complete bullshit. I just personally saw a better picture than on my old monitor. And still watching friends. I have even not IPS a matrix and not as dense pixels, for the old model. For example on the other LG 4K 9серии the General picture is fabulous. What can we say about the rest. And about all of the above and others, there are many people have many opinions, the article is an ordinary person who seem to not even get into the matter, as I leafed through a few pages of Google, which issued the first written the same as he. Technology goes forward and displays are not static. The trick is, always and everywhere, if you know what you take won't get. And tricks are concerned not with the TV, and just the total market sales.

Recochica
Unfortunately I do not remember, was used in 2012. But everything was clear without dancing with a tambourine (the monitor was a ViewSonic V3D231 - it program was complete, the graphics card was a HD 7970 ).
Maxim Ovchinnikov
And you can prove your words to reinforce the actual performance data of these technologies super color. Anything like that I just could not find (especially without looking).
How can a TV be a better professional monitor, designed to work with content for this TV?

I'm somewhere in the 15th year tried TriDef 3D run 3D via driver Amud. Apparently the current driver does not support 3D.

Recochica
There is a driver at all and. App (puts his driver) as an add-on is used (like a Converter), she did not care, the manufacturer of your video card and monitor. Read it here http://testlabs.kz/671-tridef-3d.html
You probably messed something up.
Can download a sample https://download.freedownloadmanager.org/Windows-PC/TriDef-3D/FREE.html if the interest remained.

That was what I wanted from AMD 3D and the program wrote that a driver is not found. At the time was the latest available.

Recochica
What is 3D feature from AMD? They released HD3D to the masses she went and bent (was Friends only with these screens https://support.amd.com/ru-ru/recommended/hd3d-displays). But it is quite another matter from independent developers. Is friends with all vidyuhi and monitors. Even on a normal Monica, you can get Anaglyph 3D. As she works on packing (active 3D) technology, I don't know, but on a passive interlaced , fine.
There is a AMD LiquidVR™, but she for VR-helmets and goggles augmented reality-a completely different song.

For the advice on the program Tridef3d I thank you very much, I do not quite understand yet how it works, but to my amazement even Skyrim went to full 3D. However, I have not tried everything, but the support of many already-configured I understand games. Set settings SIde by SIde. The NSF ze wounds when you run this app, stopped the keyboard working. So, too, her view did not work, disappointing. While stuck for Skyrim, quite a different impression of the game.

Maxim Ovchinnikov
The program has a ready-made profiles for games. If profile (support) no, you can find it online (I did). About the blade Claudia-I can't say anything (you can ask around on the forums from users where handed out).

Yes, there profiles, to be honest not needed at all. You can just put the General and the rest configure to your taste and color. Very cool program.

Makuo
Yes it is. But in some games there are different artifacts with grass and shadows. And when I put the profile, it helps with the artifacts.

Ryazancev
I get artifacts with the function of Power 3D, it just reduces the quality of the 3D. I would say quite well, scanty, and not in all games. However, 3D works, without loss of fps. FSA the point. He does not handle every frame again, due to this lost a little depth in some areas. Again it is noticeable if I sit and switch here and there by comparing the pictures. Often the way, oddly enough, becomes much better. For one thing. He ouimet edges. But it is not heavily flawed and almost not noticeable.

https://www.ixbt.com/news/2018/01/11/ces-2018-sony-oled-4.html this is the way to pass the image through the TV system. It's certainly not full features, but your OLED display will not be able to reproduce a range of 0-255? I would seriously look at better on the Internet, I have too much time there poking around, perhaps like you. Just believe in the word. TV will give a much better picture than the monitor. I'm talking about functions of a certain response will not argue, because have not delved into the issue. And I do not particularly need. I play shooters on TV many years ago. And I don't see any difference in the monitor or TV in this respect. Everything works quickly, without artifacts, and anything else. The only thing that bothers me in these games to play it's a bad wireless mouse. This is probably all. And the stories about the response on the monitors I think are the same as gertsovka TV.

Makuo
About the color range 4K TV is dumb. Because the new standard adopted in Japan for 4 TV head covers sRGB. But the TV I'm selling have never met, it's just a standard (of course, many modern TVs have switching from 16-235 to 0-255, but not all).
I seriously suffer with watching movies on the PC because of the compressed color range of all video formats movies, to set the normal shades of black PTS. difficult. I had some ideas for players to raise the shade of black is not blended, and the shades of white matter.
All video formats to date are much inferior to the standards of work with photos and other professional tasks. It makes no sense to do a Super colour reproduction on the TV, if it is not geared for the professional activity of photographer, film Director (installer video) and designer.
Ie TVs under Professor tasks do not produce! And monitors being released.
To view TV video content the most, and in all other respects it is not ice.
You will not be able to participate in e-sports FPS tournament in the discipline of on the TV.
I'm talking about this thing I read back in 2005, when mass appeared first LCD, greatly inferior to the response time of the monitor by email. beam. tube.
For comparison, the response time, you can test, measure the time (read) or to connect a gaming TN monitor and your TV, which is enough to move the mouse cursor. The difference will be huge!
It's like comparing a home audio system with Studio. Of course home is more trying to sugarcoat, and the Studio will give the purity of the standard, more natural.
Now such a pain in the ass to photographers and fixers (who does weddings and celebrations). People are watching content on TV, and standards different. The people themselves sometimes do not know what their range of TV. The content is too contrasty or too unsaturated. And all this should be done in two ranges as consumers did not realize.

Ryazancev wrote:
To view TV video content the most, and in all other respects, it is not ice

You contradict yourself in many ways

many modern TV have a switch from 16-235 to 0-255, but not all). You forgive, but my TV works on both. And he was already 10 years almost.

The crux of the matter