Why games 2004 want to play,and they don't graphiste
What's the matter? What 1970?Why games 2004 want to play,and they don't graphiste
Grifondoro don't need to be, that's what.
By the way, doom 3 and ku-4 sockmod is. The game improves significantly!
It all depends on the style. But the 3D shit can't stand. I'm a big fan of 2D. So no problem playing games 70s-80s.
Ghost Hunter wrote:
It all depends on the style. But the 3D shit can't stand.
*Contrib 3D was in the late nineties, and even then not everywhere and not always ) On konsolkah - Yes, of course, the models looked awful. I remember a game about Bubsy that moved into the era of 3D... the game is very atstoynoy )
In 2004 we had two games that competed with each other: Doom 3 and Unreal 2 (although it is 2003). Models in U2 was better, but also (but this is only my opinion), although the replayability+mods+expansions Doom 3 brought in the first place. Alas, the Unreal series cannot boast of than ever was strong the great Doom (the whole series)...
Ghost Hunter wrote:
So no problem playing games 70s-80s.
70s? What was that? ) Machines must in stores? ) IMHO: the sad era before Mario and Zelda...
Stop whining.
wrote:
2004
Far Cry, Doom 3, HL2 with the cinematic mod - but there are still rules.
If the game is really interesting, the chart can be used. Yet for some, no small role plays the nostalgia.
taburetckinvasily wrote:
What's the matter? What 1970?
Delusional? What does 1970й when talking about 2004? )
The topic was not you, right? ;] Well... now you! )
the author of the topic wrote:
Why games 2004 want to play,and they don't graphiste
Well, you snickering just &)
ant21 wrote:
nostalgia
Now, 2018го years, to write about nostalgia, about the 2004m is appropriate ) But this is all not concerned, some users have seen the days of the late nineties and even before, have seen the appearance on the shelves (or from the hands of dealers in the metro and stalls) of the old masterpieces of the nineties...
what games came out in 2000-2005