Chernobyl: truth and fiction in the acclaimed series
ColonelJason wrote:
At 21:32 says that the series shows that all deeds committed at gunpoint.
I remembered how his shot back in the war. Without this in any way, intimidated even, because surrendered 5.75 million Soviet soldiers who fled from the Bolsheviks, who from the corpses was making the shelter. From this, even the enemies were in shock. The enemy ran EN masse to the elite of Soviet power - officers. The prisoner gave up the high ranks of the labor and peasant army, including generals. The shame of it!
Of course, under the guns went, and now I go. And mow from the army and fled, evacuated abroad. And life here is like worth a penny and not worth it. It's amazing how nothing has changed!
Hellhound_Anger
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
I remembered how his shot back in the war.
I always to expose the meanness of the authorities, but I think that we should not discredit this useful initiative by excesses in the other direction - you need to understand that our demise is a tool for denigrating the ideas of civil society, and relaying demidovii speculation we're going on about power.
With regards to the security officers with the PCA, firing back with its- I certainly have not studied the question of the degree sufficient for something to say categorically, but at current my opinion, it is rather a mythologizing of isolated cases. Besides the fact that shooting their troops, so to speak, is not very practical, this approach does not fit well into the framework of everyday logic. First, these arrows in their regularly died from random friendly fire (who will be there to sort out?). Secondly, it is not clear why someone would create a precedent for shooting yourself: why run for a man with PCA, his whole appearance indicating that you are a deserter, if there is a great tactic possum?
Spoiler
Hellhound_Anger
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
Proplacheny bot appeared.
And pay a lot?
Nevoeiro
Nevoeiro wrote:
So you are diagnosed by the comments on the game site
Tearful to read your sloppy WHY NOT. NOTHING and NOTHING are two completely different words.In the second case the stress falls on the letter E in the first syllable
- There will be no more.You shouldn't be here
With your knowledge of the Russian language in my middle school would have left the second year