3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
D
Domoi 17.03.20 10:13 am

\"March 18, 2018...\"

%Выборы2018%
To whom you give your precious vote?

Zhirinovsky? Apple? Sobchak? Breast? Suraykin? Baburin? Titov? Putin in the end of it all...
Or do you boycott such an interesting idea?
149 Comments
Sort by:
r
requiemmm 17.03.20

ihappy wrote:
And the boss can't check who voted.
Elementary. In Muhosranske is no work, or you show me a picture with a form who and spread of the passport or the following certification does not pass, dismissed for discrepancy of a post and go homeless. And my actions were legal, because you're afraid of me, to witness you, a herd of cowards, will not go for obvious reasons, and the court anything against the government won't say. The Union? And you got membership fees and it does not belong. To complain about me to my superiors? I do a direct order, albeit verbal.
And, you know, conversation does not need the Internet! You can be familiar with people personally and sometimes take out the bananas from his ears.
Inspectors from the candidates, how cute...150 thousand settlements and all the supervisors, supervisors, personal planes, petrol free then get. Math, you heartless n%?! What in masquerade a couple of hundred clowns have launched a violent activity does not mean that it is an all-Russian scale. Anyway, in order to control something, you have a head on your shoulders to have, and this is now strained.

i
ihappy 17.03.20

requiemmm wrote:
Elementary. In Muhosranske is no work, or you show me a picture with a form who and spread of the passport or the following certification does not pass, dismissed for discrepancy of a post and go homeless.
It's a fantasy and nothing more.
I can answer in the style of fantasy you have.
Take to draw a tick on a piece of paper, put it on the form and take a picture. Profit.
requiemmm wrote:
You can be familiar with people personally and sometimes take out the bananas from his ears.
OO Yes. Listen and believe in God.
requiemmm wrote:
Inspectors from the candidates, how cute...150 thousand settlements and all the supervisors, supervisors, personal planes, petrol free then get. Math, you heartless n%?!
I understand you think that, in muhosranske will not find people who will control it.
But. From different parties. And these controllers in the 99% is saying everything was clean. Yes there are violations. The theory of large numbers explains why.
requiemmm wrote:
Anyway, in order to control something, you have a head on your shoulders to have, and this is now strained.
Even the last down control is fine.
There is nothing complicated.

requiemmm
That's your problem. What you don't know how does the election really. Here, you invent stories, the type of oral orders with photos etc.
(note of course oral orders, but this one and no one will not be controlled by this order, as there is no possibility, even theoretical)
Understand. The election is not what you think. When people are ticked off, this is just legitimizing the elections. They pass before the elections.
How to make people chose one candidate or another, has long been known. This specific technology. Adhering to it, you can guarantee a particular outcome of the elections.
When Putin more than 60% of electoral support. Why would he rig the election.? And all so clear.

r
requiemmm 17.03.20

ihappy wrote:
The election is not what you think. When people are ticked off, this is just legitimizing the elections. They pass before the elections.
How to make people chose one candidate or another, has long been known. This specific technology. Adhering to it, you can guarantee a particular outcome of the elections.
Confirmed me said. Apparently, it is necessary sometimes to read what they write.
A victory, to which you rush, automatically means even more amusing conclusion. How can you call people over and over again voluntarily voting for the deterioration of his life? They absolutely freely, without coercion, on the day of voting, come and vote, then the results are honestly counted, as if zashugannyh state employees can count as a necessary, but not as said, then go to the centre, where they are verified and displayed as the final result. This is your main idea about which you have forgotten. In my picture of the world manipulates them ill will, in your -- in your it's a bloody suicide club 120 million members.

i
ihappy 17.03.20

requiemmm wrote:
Confirmed me said. Apparently, it is necessary sometimes to read what they write.
You clearly don't wrote it. You have the election of chiefs the Executive orders direct write oral.
That is nonsense.
requiemmm wrote:
How can you call people over and over again voluntarily voting for the deterioration of his life?
It's sophomoric.
Vote for the one who is no worse and better than others.
Here's who to vote for?
Grudinin(it is forbidden here to name for some reason)? Sobchak?
Or a swindler Navalny?(Yes, he is not involved, but it does not change it)
You did not think that the choice between shit and shit is bitter sweet, the choice always falls on the sweet, though shit.
Not to understand it, to accuse people in some way, that is a sign of stupidity.
requiemmm wrote:
like zashugannyh state employees can calculate how
You should go to the observers. Once. To understand the process from inside. Believe me, many questions instantly disappear.
requiemmm wrote:
In my picture of the world manipulates them ill will, in your -- in your it's a bloody suicide club 120 million members.
In politics, no evil fate. There's only cold calculation. And they are not suicidal.
Technology how to make the most of a particular idea, work for centuries.
All these technologies work on large masses of people. It is not necessary to convince everyone in some way. It is necessary that the majority thought so. And some, just a loud majority.
Goebbels did not invent anything new.

PS. Perhaps Putin has ordered to prohibit the use of the word Grudinin

m
masha 17.03.20

I myself would not go to elections, and neither should you. Feel the danger. As if something bad planned.
I think that people need until need cannon fodder.
Technology is not standing still(in Rosie standing still), and you can podsokratit the population, and so if they can do it without meat. There's already the rocket launch, which leave trace amounts of radiation, which is then posted by the County. Medicine is in place, none of your sores will not heal, you are important to multiply.

Time to pack your bags.

S
Samyy krutanskiy krutan 17.03.20

ihappy wrote:
That's your problem. What you don't know how does the election really.
How?
ihappy wrote:
When people are ticked off, this is just legitimizing the elections. They pass before the elections.
Elections (they) are before the elections? Where, how and when? It's some sort of secret, one known ihappy elections?
ihappy wrote:
How to make people chose one candidate or another, has long been known. This specific technology. Adhering to it, you can guarantee a particular outcome of the elections.
Ten candidates, all of them are aware of this particular technology and it results follow. So why, by sticking to it wins all the same someone one? As it is not convincing on account of the guaranteed outcome of the election...

i
ihappy 17.03.20

Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
How?
Go to the polls. I can not explain. A lot to do. Honestly, there is no desire.
Watch the video at last. The process is very tedious and I don't want)
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Elections (they) are before the elections? Where, how and when? It's some sort of secret, one known ihappy elections?
Count. There are in the country elitka. They decide almost everything in the country. The President essentially is the mouthpiece of these elitok. Yes, Putin may not shout, and maybe even the head. But the essence remains the same.
These people before the election to shape public opinion. And make choices for the people. Suggesting that choice in many ways. Gebels for dummies in help ;)
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Ten candidates, all of them are aware of this particular technology and it results follow. So why, by sticking to it wins all the same someone one? As it is not convincing on account of the guaranteed outcome of the election...
There are several factors.
1. Elections are very expensive. Not everyone can afford a PR on TV 24 hours a day. And someone can.
2. The most important thing. And why did you decide that all candidates use these technologies? To use them, we must first have a platform for broadcasting. If it's TV, all super. If it's radio, it's bullshit but better than nothing.

PS. Again krucinski the quiet badass is trying to catch on something, instead of dispute or communication. This is so much fun)

Masha wrote:
Time to pack your bags.
Mash, and you have already found another planet?
Or the cockroaches will help?

S
Samyy krutanskiy krutan 17.03.20

ihappy
ihappy wrote:
Again krucinski the quiet badass is trying to catch on something, instead of dispute or communication.
I just clarify. Just at first you write one thing, then it turns out that there is still something you are not previously mentioned.
First.
ihappy wrote:
Adhering to it, you can guarantee a particular outcome of the elections.
Then it turns out by passing the above
ihappy wrote:
There are several factors.
You point out the person's ignorance.
ihappy wrote:
What you don't know how does the election really.
A quite natural question - how?, answer
ihappy wrote:
I can not explain. A lot to do. Honestly, there is no desire.
Watch the video at last. The process is very tedious and I don't want)
Refer to the Internet, the use of which others are not welcome
ihappy wrote:
Sad. Judged on the Internet...
...
Spoilerphobe the result - not noticeable to you, but obvious to any other contradictions and inconsistencies of your statements does not help to reduce the level of skepticism to everything written thee. And not only me if you happen to still did not notice.
Heh, heh... You are surrounded by nonsense, crazy and just stupid... don't You think that the level of all your opponents (quite low in your opinion) unwittingly lowers your own level of intelligence (which is darkness and darkness, heh, heh...)

y
yariko.v 17.03.20

Turkisation...
What to choose?..
I least sympathize with Cobc@K: for more like plant from the West SHL*x#, and the piles of&n&n, which is apparently on top is mired in foreign financial investments.
The patriot is a Put&n and Zhirinovsk&th, the first proven and stable, the second with a sense of humor.
The rest, IMHO, is generally not particularly remarkable.
Zhirinovsk&th wrote:
this political garbage
Smiled, thank you.

A
A.Soldier of Light 17.03.20

Watched a few editions of your debate between the candidates for President 8) it's Funny. The best part was the 28 Feb ))
For a moment, that first gave the candidates, they managed to tell briefly about his program. The lol came out at number 3 )
Here's what they had to say in a minute opening speech at the debate on February 28:


PS
Poor Piles?NIN, now can only save his successful victory in the elections ^_^
To dream, as they say, bad, but still )

requiemmm wrote:
In Muhosranske is no work, or you show me a picture with a form who and spread of the passport or the following certification does not pass, dismissed for discrepancy of a post and go homeless.
That's the problem of the Russians. They do not know their rights and do not want to know, apparently, don't want to defend them. Of course it's easier to shut up and be patient, but it's easier - momentary benefit, harmful in the long run. It is time for you, as your President said, to evolve. That's where I believe in evolution ^_^
requiemmm wrote:
How can you call people over and over again voluntarily voting for the deterioration of his life?
Heh, that's it )) That is, you're right of course, there are such cases, simply is not an argument against the elections. This is an argument against ordinary people ) is Good that such cases are, I think, rare, not frequent and widespread. If I'm wrong, prove it, otherwise leave as is ;]

ihappy wrote:
How to make people chose one candidate or another, has long been known. This specific technology.
Read more here...
ihappy wrote:
the choice between shit and shit is bitter sweet, the choice always falls on the sweet, though shit.
Not to understand it, to accuse people in some way, that is a sign of stupidity.
I agree.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
ihappy wrote:
There are several factors.
You point out the person's ignorance.
ihappy wrote:
What you don't know how does the election really.
A quite natural question - how?, answer:
ihappy wrote:
I can not explain. A lot to do. Honestly, there is no desire.
Watch the video at last. The process is very tedious and I don't want)
Refer to the Internet, the use of which others are not welcome
ihappy wrote:
Sad. Judged on the Internet...

Support.

R
Rolemanser 17.03.20

A. Soldier of Light
And they have the muzzle face? Any smudges you by accident, these pictures are not using the special glasses did as one film, put on glasses and see the aliens who, without glasses look like people?

i
ihappy 17.03.20

Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
A quite natural question - how?, answer
The answer was completely. To see the kitchen inside. it is necessary to attend at least once.
You can explain, but better to see. That would be March 18, go to spectator and see.
If you want to know. And so another attempt to teach someone else.
The fact you clearly don't understand what was going on.
Mind you, I gave the answer to all your questions. And in response I only heard what you are instructive.
Krucinski the quiet badass
Listen, what I have with you correspondence. You don't have a dialogue. You always teach. And who are you? A youngster with a high FSI?

D
Denis Kyokushin 17.03.20

For Breast

D
Domoi 17.03.20

[Denis]
Have you heard about his gold abroad?

D
Denis Kyokushin 17.03.20

taburetckinvasily
They all have something abroad.It is unlikely that all the candidates are poor as a nation

D
Domoi 17.03.20

[Denis]
Of course, but the breast I was impressed.
You Communist views?

D
Denis Kyokushin 17.03.20

taburetckinvasily
I like his policy Sovhoze.

R
Ryazancev 17.03.20

[Denis]
Spoiler

D
Denis Kyokushin 17.03.20

Ryazancev
I have a suspicion that at the helm will remain Vova.The debate did not participate.About him none of the candidates even sound not make a sound,but each other govnische flung.Looks like children in a sandbox arguing whose toy.But the Breast was silent

R
Ryazancev 17.03.20

[Denis]
All these elections are a circus for the crowd. Normal people in serious policy will not be allowed, because their progressive ideas of the common good (justice) diverge from the interests of personal gain.
Even the progressive-minded people will not understand. It is easier to promise three boxes and let him choose the heart.