3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
m
mazinily 17.03.20 09:03 pm

Fallout 3 or fallout new vegas which is better (Fallout 3)

want to buy or fallout new vegas or part 3 but don't know which is better

if anyone can answer me a few questions

1) which of these parts is better

2) are there any bugs on win 7 or win 10 since me and my brother one steam I have Windows 7 and he is 10 and want to buy a key so that the money return will not work

2) is it worth to play them? I know it is the same that Skyrim
31 Comments
Sort by:
b
boris246 17.03.20

the three-pointer is very similar to Skyrim (only with ghouls and guns), but Vegas did the Obsidians, a Gazebo just published. For me, Vegas is just brought to mind the three in terms of plot, quests, game mechanics, etc. Bugs with win7 and 10 extra not seen.

R
Revan Reborn 17.03.20

New Vegas take.

H
Homikator 17.03.20

New Vegas from Obsidian Entertainment, these guys know a lot about RPGs.

G
Graf_995 17.03.20

Three

W
Wolfram carbide 17.03.20

Both parts I went on pirates with all the additions. 3ka very good study of the capital wasteland and destroyed the Fashington with the history of the Institute from the 4th mintroute and Vegas with their quests and DLC is a very exciting story of the courier and all the characters. Take first one, then another, a choice without a difference.

A
Alexandrovitch 17.03.20

To play in New Vegas - you Need to know the history of Fallout 3 . More precisely its foundations. So the story itself is not so stupid really. More reminiscent of our real life in pustyak.In the relationship with the child and father. Good shows the game myself. For total immersion before New Vegas. At least, you need to pass the third part. To have a coherent experience of the universe itself

_
_POINTMAN_ 17.03.20

Each is good in its own way. Take both.

N
Noran 17.03.20

mazinily wrote:
1) which of these parts is better
For myself, everyone decides for himself. If you fanateesh of the branching plot and a no study of NPC - HB, but if you like to play the role, think through and come up with the most story aspects, some in the sandbox - a three-pointer. For me the key in an RPG is roleplaying, for me it's three.
mazinily wrote:
2) are there any bugs on win 7 or win 10 since me and my brother one steam I have Windows 7 and he is 10 and want to buy a key so that the money return will not work
In General, I do not know now, I had 3 copies polaca third (steam, Nonsteam and gvfl) with gfvl actual hemorrhoids, if not embroidered, but in steam vesriya it looks embroidered, but all can happen in this game that there that there, because the game is not sharpened under seven and above.
mazinily wrote:
is it worth to play them? I know it is the same that Skyrim
If you like TES, is to play in a three, by far. Many complain there green barf filter. What can you do - radiation. But in NV I personally annoying diarrhea yellow filter, Yes, you know, desert and all, but look at the monitor - see the shit in nature.

Oh yeah, in NV the subs, in three is localization. To dive the most, especially that uttered the raiders of the capital wasteland to the address of the player.

C
Cvoxalury 17.03.20

Both games are great. And both are cheap, do not skimp, the author.
In the F3 better world design and locations of postpa more than westerns. More depressing and visually rich world. Great city postp above and below ground.
FNV is better in quests and story, more of a Western than postpa. The world 90% is common, in fact, a desert, but eventful and very interesting, post-apocalyptic romance of the prairies. And the hardcore mode.

Oh, and Yes. Bugs full. It is better to Google some solutions for brakes, edit config, maybe even unofficial patches, but otherwise will be a lot of suffering (F3 - more).

Z
ZloyViki 17.03.20

mazinily
Of both. And most importantly in huge quantities!)

I
Int0xicate 17.03.20

To me the F3 is always more Vegas like. Somehow Vegas all adore and think is super game, but in comparison the three called bad. Although Vegas is all built on the mechanics of 3 parts. If not three, it would not be Vegas at all.
Me Vegas once hooked, well, nothing at all. Do not like all this subject of Las Vegas casino. Game a couple of times and took some epic impressions were not. And if to look objectively, the role system and have not pulled any big gameplay changes and functioning in an open world is also not delivered. Added small craft, and relationships with groups. But this is not enough. Although the part is not numbered, so it is not critical.
But the three play very much. In General, the first passage she shot me a lot and gave cool emotions. Even still remember the location in which you can find a bobblehead, a secret weapon or to take a quest. Studied it up and down. Were all additions that I must say, perfectly done. At all, but the DLS aliens just don't particularly like, and boring hallway. And most of all pitt hooked, that's bombing the Supplement, there is still a cool atmosphere.
The game in Washington and the atmosphere of the Wasteland for me in the three on the top ten is made. It is interesting to just wander the world and explore the location.
Vegas isn't a bad game, at least better vyser called Fallout 4, which is neither fish nor fowl at all.
Just waiting for the next F5 from Obsidian, a Gazebo with F4 hard failed.
To start playing is with 3 pieces. Something from Skyrim are there, but the game itself is original. Similarities and purely for the eye. Yet in Skyrim all the other themes. Then you can go through Vegas.
I even envy you, what you first going to play these games. These games are good because there is your world and you into it for a long time. This is not some kind of duty single player 7-8 hours of play.

V
VovanFitisov 17.03.20

New Vegas is more my liking than the 3 minute. But play them both worth it. Take both — you will not regret.

O
Olly-alpha 17.03.20

Another vote to buy both. They are different but each good in its own right. In F3 its pros and its cons. In Vegas - your. There is no perfection, but in fact both toys - gorgeous RPG in a large open world with a very nice DLS and mnogokvartirnym wager. In Vegas an emphasis on global story, the decisions of the player and their consequences. F3 - to content living, rich in adventure world where at every turn - its own little story, to participate in which can a bunch of different ways. The replay value on both is huge.

N
Nkupe 17.03.20

In my opinion both are good ,but New Vegas I like .But opinions and everyone has different tastes .

R
Revan Reborn 17.03.20

On the website of sakasaka conductive on both of them off for steam. Both with all dlc there are 220 rubles.

R
Rolemanser 17.03.20

Just bear in mind that Vegas is the incentive for the Russian language, and F3 is not.

V
Vor Piratych 17.03.20

Download both the torrent and see for yourself.

m
mazinily 17.03.20

Thief Pertici
I want to buy

s
saa0891 17.03.20

Both toys are great,in Vegas more choice in faction and variety,but in the F3 there is a real atmosphere of the Apocalypse,and of course the war is BS and Enclave delivers in Vegas the atmosphere is more like the wild West,and the lack of super mutants as something very upsetting.

K
KOLBAS 17.03.20

mazinily
............want to buy or fallout new vegas or part 3 but don't know what the best
To buy?Buy three or HB?Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to download BOTH the torrent and the DIN of two parts for your pleasure.
And so ,I personally third part is much more like it.I even bought Litzau.