Prompt 32\" va +144 2K
Stared and had to choose between ips and va, and have decided that va is More like contrast and cheaper, though not much that you can get a good 2K +of 144 Hz and a large, 32 inch, and why?Drevyn wrote:
Stared and had to choose between ips and va, and have decided that va is More like contrast and cheaper, though not much that you can get a good 2K +of 144 Hz and a large, 32 inch, and why?
You for games the monitor is necessary? Or something else going for him to do? If just only for games, it would be possible to take Tnku, it would be cheaper the more VA and IPS. And indeed the budget what ?
I took two weeks ago, the Samsung Curved C32JG54 (LC32JG54QQIXCI), just the gun, first from ofigel sizes but now for anything less would not sit down, just space.
read the forums, write that curve dead pixels more and with fonts jambs, so check
Dako7
Fit Monique, added it to the list of applicants for purchase, but the first generation of Ryazan+5700xt it on fulko not take out.
Or Monique for growth?)
BIG_CrasheR
The sense I get? Cartoon +100 everywhere, in singles Gershom, Control, Рейдж2 too, about 70-90, all on ultra, with traincom picture is great, all smooth and beautiful, do not know what you're talking about.
Dako7
144гц about it, it makes sense to take 144 and play at 100 fps?)
Yes, kanesh to lower the settings to 144 was, but with such a system fulhd 144 was profitsee and cheaper, IMHO. And the smoothness of 144 Hz visible stronger personally cecal.
BIG_CrasheR
You now no map 144 fps will not give on the ultra with p and all buns, so that's not the point. + pricing works in 120 Hz, at 120 Lachish in any cartoon and it's great, but the singles still look better than full HD 60 fps, that in any case we must take 144, even in the future like me more 32 I did not take the monitor, so it's still my work.
Stared and had to choose between ips and va, and have decided that va is More like contrast and cheaper, though not much that you can get a good 2K +of 144 Hz and a large, 32 inch, and why?
two weeks ago, took a 4K 32 inch. can say 2K is neither fish nor fowl , 144 Hz in games nafig not needed if you are not a Pro-gamer . Now the main thing is HDR. 4K and a minimum of 32 inches. The same Odyssey and lark last HDR transforms beyond recognition for the better - the picture is simply breathtaking. In full HD and 2K people are just playing without emotion. But 4K HDR just without interruption for experience too catch the spirit.
Dako7
So I mean it so big. Think of the invisible in 3080 ti a thread already will inject power in volkach 144 on the Quad, but then people will have another interest, or Quad 240 Hz or 4K 144гц etc.
I'd take a now popular fulhd, then sold and had sagging in the price of the Quad.
32 inch hike the ceiling for a gaming monitor, more head tired to turn around.
Dogma
may I ask what monitor? I tried to sit at 4K and even XS, it seems to me that the difference is that the 2K that 4K is not noticed, while the load much more on the graphics card, especially at 4K is not even 75 but actually only 60 Hz was on for hdr need 1000 NIT brightness, XS, have not seen such monitors, and if they are in my budget, they are unlikely to fall
duXalis wrote:
it would be possible to take Tnku,
not seen 32 monitors 144 Hz +tn and why? if you can take va for example?
Drevyn
may I ask what monitor?
https://www.philips.ru/c-p/326M6VJRMB_00/momentum-4k-hdr-display-with-ambiglow
As for the difference, as anyone. I have 2K was not, I do not know. With full HD switched to 4K. Put 2K in games, one can see that the picture is more soap. Although maybe 2K monitor all right.