The transition from 1280x1024 FULL HD
Plan to take a monitor with full hd resolution. At the moment, stands the old square 5:4 format (1280x1024). My question is whether strongly I will lose FPS in games with the new resolution? (1920x1080)If the graphics card of gtx 750/750ti, r7 360 - fullHD unambiguously, but Amateur settings!
If this is what the GeForce 9 Series is just a square.
In the transition from 1280x1024 to 1920x1080, and depending on the graphics card! The loss of fps can reach 50%.
WanRoi
WanRoi wrote:
and depending on the graphics card! The loss of fps can reach 50%.
what is it like? you better read my post on how much the resolution is increased, before writing nonsense invented just. If you do not know, even approximately, why write something?
MagicHero wrote:
what is it like? you better read my post on how much the resolution is increased, before writing nonsense
On the example of Zotac GeForce GT 1030:
Spoiler
In UHD, the loss of fps, more than 70% compared to Full resolution. Not hard dogadatsya that square resolution the fps will be more, maybe even 4 times, compared to Full. That is, a stable 100 fps. Now, no one in such a 1280x1024 resolution, but runs no test. Fashion is not the same.
Let's proof that this is - nonsense
Spoiler
WanRoi
the nonsense you write giving 50% drop of performance i.e. in 2 times increased resolution 1.5 times. Now, you gotta use the brains and think as none can grow a load of 2 times if the resolution is increased by only 1.5 times. For comparison, I even gave the example that in 4K resolution compared to 1080p performance drops to ~3 times (increasing resolution there is exactly 4 times).
What about the fact that you have taken the test in GTA 5 then I'm in the same first post explained what could contribute to subsidence. But you all MIA to think and write their fantasies and know nothing about the subject.
WanRoi
I can't really understand you stupid? I told you all painted as is, but if you need tests here http://gamegpu.com/ pick any game and then the resolution and compare both fell performance.
So Lolka next time think before you write something )))
MagicHero
I have a question about your iron, you have a powerful video card gtx 1080 and why not six-percent of the money is not enough rich tool
ScariN
the Witcher any vidyahu put on his knees
So this is it before when it came out put any vidyahu on his knees. With him now not as easy to handle even 1070.
ScariN
why percent is not six core
So instead, you can get the same maybe more operatives or ssd or HDD. Yeah, what the fuck up! I, for example, instead of buying the shestiyadernik of osmeteria set aside money, save up and put a second vidyahu to bake. If I was sitting for 6-8 nuclear and one videhoe, it would lose 35-45 FSP! That is, to hell.
And what exactly is the dispute????
ScariN
Please write a program,where you monitor the statistics.'ve been looking for.
Shadowarm
I monitor mostly FPS Monitor but it is paid but I bought it used and I like the second and MSI Afterburner you can still overclock the video card and adjust the velocity of the fan coolers
STANDS of Milivoje
the man assures me that my Intel Core i5-3570 is already very old and my video card gtx 1060 on my 2k monitor will not vydovat 60 fps and 30
ScariN
About what gives 1060-I 2K resolution gaming on the ultra I wrote to you and gave examples of games which will be around 30 fps. Why continue to discuss something I don't understand.
About percent it to 60 fps in games which play so far lacking: the Witcher 3, GTA 5, The division, WW2, and CoD BO2, ANNO 2205, Fallout 4, Far cry primal, PUB, Killing floor 2, Project cars, Batman Arkham knight, Wreckfest, etc. Is part of the games not yet passed (some have no end) and occasionally I play all games license, bought the incentive that was not there problem and then who knows where you will suffer ))) And percent already at the limit and change of course necessary, eyeing the 8700, if the price of PERC are kind of equal here to the RAM just ghastly to look at, 15K for 16 gigs that are just so pissed and in total about 50K (mother, percents, ahlad, memory) and fps all I play is not increased, as 60 will remain, except that in fallout 4 in the cities in some places fps will not sink.
MagicHero
and if I put the socket to 1150 fps will soar? I by the way wonder as mentioned earlier with the course of Dolora now prices have soared to the old platform used to sell the toad smothers + I already have it 7 years
here is an example of my CPU cycles
ScariN wrote:
and if I put the socket to 1150 fps will soar?
A wrong formulation of the question. In General, the PC depending on configuration, you can issue a 400-900фпс. This original performance. My system, for example, gives 712фпс.
The system issues a signal to the monitor. Any Premium monitor is limited to 60Hz, 1080 old new 4K, because there are bound to ips-matrix, PremierColor, TrueColor, HDR, Rec, sRGB, X-rite, etc. No system, with all this economy will not give you more than 60fps, without breaking the frame and rendering. Picture quality and 60fps today, regardless of the system.
Of course, you can play through the black-and-white filter, 200-300фпс and rejoice. :)
I do not understand these arguments for fps, what do the dispute. There are, of course, 144Гц monitors, but they are all TN, if not TFT, not all described above, and therefore the frequency is higher. Either the picture or fps. Someone chooses one thing someone else. A matter of taste.
ScariN
I honestly do not understand why you showed me this video, I kind of have the same CPU only overclocking. If it show in the Witcher 3 is on the square in Novigrad and there if without overclocking he will be missed, there is even 4.2 Hz sometimes skips freezes.
About to sell the system just like you and me then it's pointless, I personally for all the time only sold 1070 when changed to 1080. All the rest of the iron leave, although 1.5 years ago, the GTX 780 could be sold for good money like 4.5 years ago HD 5850 but leave them on the memory collection )))