Your attitude to the clever

Pilat.
and here vshtyrilo!))
Bazhenov

Yes, he just only consumer goods and obserat, isn't it?
where it to high art

S
Narkomana sit two at a table asks:
Is the CHICKEN?
- NO. IT KAVETSA!
it) Batik CCS a pleasant character

sorry... how high?

Pilat.
that is how high?
stars out of Eugene? uninteresting a long time, couple first time was very even, then sucks - if only .Aries watered for the benefit of the subscribers))
why is he one and the same bears, which is most understandable?

S wrote:
where it to high art
Pilat. wrote:
sorry... how high?
I mean, give examples of high art)

rating does not matter if a person basically says the right things. and waters from harm. obviously the same)
means you about some other most say. once the slag theme very a Bang come the citizens of the majority

Pilat.
what are the things he says? those who are pleasing to the ear? so it is not new.. the people are not happy, the man earns..

about high art, all movies are called She let them discuss, and hundreds of them)))

S
yep... people are mean... but your perhaps - not pleasant?
all that concerns human perception is not new under the sun

the first time I hear. I only know It :D

Pilat.
here You are also as casual It is then I see :( sorry..
It!
a movie where a man asked a dead cat to masturbate, S voiced by Scarlett Johansson
another movie with the same name - aunt was raped and she's happy with it...
and that's just from the fresh to the heap with the same name..
let Eugene see, it would be interesting opinion to hear no bullshit

but he like a worm where most of the people there and salvage cuts))

S
you from the sect of the green elephant chtol?) for measure the temperature of Madam)

Pilat.
you further than the elephant and cannot see, alas and Eugene your

https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/ona-2013-577488/
https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/ona-2016-842857/

S
it is not my and nationwide)

in any case. description frankly popahivaet alternative perception of reality. not my thing

Pilat.
so it is that the topic is not yours, but undertake to discuss)))
by passing the norms of the themes of films, descending to outright povsednevnye, can judge the real movie?

Lobster you are in the topic))
https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/lobster-2015-819846/

Pilat. wrote:
in any case. description frankly popahivaet alternative perception of reality. not my thing
Yes, it's possible I spoke sharply, in fact, a movie extremely high quality, well, except Scarlet will get to name stuff? and she would not go for a penny)))

S
I undertake to discuss what they can reach. forgive me, innocent victims of my ignorance) in fact I to him no more than chewing gum for example
and that you rules themes that to me smacks of izvraschenki. but this is not accurate. although this is already enough not to go there. malicious files to burn

Pilat.
and what for you cinema not a perversion?
You hurt me so..
in General, I would like, not every man will pull

and... to what is now impossible to reach? with our Internet?
Eugene just strength and courage is not enough to encroach on the movie worthwhile, and maybe that people hawala)))
Bogdan Titomir told))

S
until recently quite loyal to the mass culture of the 80s and 90s due to the fact that the choice was limited. after looking closely podnabralsya of skepticism and treat everything with a high share of criticism. this step may will not be overcome.
this hurt you more reason, I was not. because you're wasting offended)
with the movie probably had enough. the world is clearly not over)

Pilat.
well, I told you not culture the 80-90-x offer))
but modern movies to discuss, but the fact is that you do not want to watch them because they do not pull, it's easier this silly thing
like the one that national hero versions of their pokazyval, and Oh, horror! I believe him and come to watch))) - this is the rating,

S
*yawns* on the Internet someone is always wrong) here comes our local luminaries of the thoughts and otpishu you eight pages of comprehensive report for all of your themes. and I already daaaavno go to sleep. calm duty

Pilat.
well tats good bye))
I fixed on the opinions of others, especially when you started to cover up and yawn,
the fucking happened source)))

the feeling that Eugene and talked with those who looks at the bottom, and in a normal movie stump wood)

S wrote:
I fixed on the opinions of others
strange,but so many comments from you in the thread.

S wrote:
and I love talking with those who disagree with me, but a living language, not nakoplennymi..
[Denis] wrote:
Not always.The consent of the cheating is not nice.But the opinion of someone who does not agree,it would be interesting to hear if it is argued competently
Yes, the dispute is an interesting thing, just for the PG usually due to the lack of arguments, he either often turns into insults, or well, just becomes boring and unbearable. Even if remembered: I was arguing so on a topic with a user named kung fu master (penguin from Madagascar on the avatar). Now, this blissful mind gentleman no word of their own opinions, not said and her own understanding of the matter under discussion is not expressed, but literally rained down on me an avalanche of links to Wikipedia. In General, after a while I realized that nothing intelligible could not sleep and simply stop to dispute with him - he thinks he's won, let the proud rooster walking in circles around the room, just shut up.
But there is another frame. Well, you know him. Gauguin. This shot, by the way - cotton veruny in God's Providence, likes to call other people with words of his own composition, such as havalimanlari. Honestly, I have no idea what that means, but to argue with this man is incredibly funny, though futile. And he is an extremist, Yes.