The transition from 4K to 8K. Is that the time?

1080p per eye) For 8K need 5 GHz network+.

See what the world trends are moving towards mass transition to 8K. Does it make sense to stay at 4K or it's time to go to 8K?

Marsj
1080 is a piece of soap, even 4K once malovato

1080p per eye) For 8K need 5 GHz network+.

Dogma
che, you are behind the times rogue, Sony display size - 19.2 x 5.4 meters, a 16K resolution 15360 x 8640 pixels

Marsj
1080 is a piece of soap, even 4K once malovato

Dogma
che, you are behind the times rogue, Sony display size - 19.2 x 5.4 meters, a 16K resolution 15360 x 8640 pixels

when the pixels of the texture at the maximum of the model approximation and objects of removal will be less than one pixel in resolution, then it will be time to come to a higher resolution.
and ische requirements polygonia should be increased here.
and technically now is not the era of 4K and full BH with a small. and last soap era was something like 720-900p like that
but if to consider as a future purchase then of course 4K and not 1080p and the era of 8K peck-peck. I find it difficult to calculate what is needed for this game. if Skyrim resolution textures for the same area up to 16K Poligona the 500k-3M range and the range of typical sneakers travon at 3-4km and almost complete visibility.
I think then it's just better 16K monitors approximately 90 sanitary diagonal. here.
above I think is already development in the pixels will not be a just marketing current if, with all 32 megapixel panels peck-peck.

1920x1080 resolution is a physical limit of human vision,so 4K,8K,16K-it's just a marketing ploy and nothing more...

when the pixels of the texture at the maximum of the model approximation and objects of removal will be less than one pixel in resolution, then it will be time to come to a higher resolution.
and ische requirements polygonia should be increased here.
and technically now is not the era of 4K and full BH with a small. and last soap era was something like 720-900p like that
but if to consider as a future purchase then of course 4K and not 1080p and the era of 8K peck-peck. I find it difficult to calculate what is needed for this game. if Skyrim resolution textures for the same area up to 16K Poligona the 500k-3M range and the range of typical sneakers travon at 3-4km and almost complete visibility.
I think then it's just better 16K monitors approximately 90 sanitary diagonal. here.
above I think is already development in the pixels will not be a just marketing current if, with all 32 megapixel panels peck-peck.

bazilews wrote:
1920x1080 is the physical limit of human vision

1920x1080 resolution is a physical limit of human vision,so 4K,8K,16K-it's just a marketing ploy and nothing more...

Dogma wrote:
it is time to go to 8K?
Neither the content nor the iron underneath it all there,and he was going to go.
Spoiler

bazilews wrote:
1920x1080 is the physical limit of human vision

Dogma wrote:
or it is time to go to 8K?
Cross,who stirs?

Dogma wrote:
it is time to go to 8K?
Neither the content nor the iron underneath it all there,and he was going to go.
Spoiler

Yes, now I saw such kind of person. Come learn better.

Dogma wrote:
or it is time to go to 8K?
Cross,who stirs?

Yes, now I saw such kind of person. Come learn better.

Home TV 50 inch 4K PC monitor 32 2K and happy as an elephant, I regret that the 55 was not taken but there is already room is not allowed, movies in 4K for many, and vidyuhi that pull games in 4K with acceptable FPSE no, so I guess now I have a straight gold standard.