The system unit.

Lex-one wrote:
Yeah, in full HD?
Who said that?
Lex-one wrote:
What's wrong?
Titanium and 3600??? Really? Maybe then the two Titanium and 1600/1700?

Lex-one wrote:
It's so stupid, at least.
What's wrong with that, explain?

Lex-one wrote:
I do not agree.
Why?
Lex-one wrote:
It's just now about AMD)
Depends on what percent, memory, mother

Mars_City
Mars_City wrote:
Who said that?
And you see that on the ultra boatnet 2080 of the latest games.
Mars_City wrote:
Titanium and 3600??? Really? Maybe then the two Titanium and 1600/1700?
Why not?
Mars_City wrote:
What's wrong with that, explain?
to pay for superfluous and unnecessary performance.

Lex-one wrote:
It's just now about AMD)
Hardly people who are not particularly versed in computers will get hot 3900-3950 is 9900k-9700k that even knowing easily dispersed

Mars_City
Mars_City wrote:
Hardly people who are not particularly versed in computers will get hot 3900-3950
They seem colder than
Mars_City wrote:
9900k-9700k

Lex-one wrote:
And you see that on the ultra boatnet 2080 of the latest games.
I looked it up. YouTube is full of videos. An awesome card. My super pulls. Do you like the same. I percent 5960x
Lex-one wrote:
Why not?
The titans in this percent in the load at each poltico?
And
Z
In
R
And
T
Lex-one wrote:
to pay for superfluous and unnecessary performance.
If anything, all that above 6 cores – do not need the performance for the same 4k

Lex-one wrote:
They seem colder than
I do not agree. 3900-3950 where hot

Mars_City
Mars_City wrote:
I do not agree. 3900-3950 where hot
I do not agree x2.

Lex-one
Look. The temperature is almost the same. If a little blue to fit five on each core, it will not be a boiler. But if red not sickly so to overclock all cores to at least 4.6, and dropsy and super motherboard will not help you cope with the heat of a volcano)

Mars_City
Mars_City wrote:
The titans in this percent in the load at each poltico?
And
Z
In
R
And
T
A proof will be? Especially for 4K ultra settings.

Lex-one
You can even search VIDOS. But now I'm too lazy to do it. You, for example your up to what'd you do? And what is the temperature m???

Mars_City
Mars_City wrote:
Look. The temperature is almost the same. If a little blue to fit five on each core, it will not be a boiler. But if red not sickly so to overclock all cores to at least 4.6, and dropsy and super motherboard will not help you cope with the heat of a volcano)
But why drive a red?
If he 9900k go large?

Lex-one
And you yourself, what do you think happens if you put super top-end card and a tiny percent???

Mars_City
On the contrary I stole to 3.7, the temperature is 45 degrees.

Lex-one wrote:
But why drive a red?
If he 9900k go large?
Go large? HHDE?

Lex-one
Compare for the interest of its percent under 3.7 and 9900k with the same 4800. It is unlikely that the user who buys a top-end PERC is to understate the frequency)

Mars_City
Here let's compare, especially in 4K.

Lex-one
Collecting an average PC user who buys it for games put аmd. The same regular user, buying a powerful PC for games put high-end Intel. So as not to mess with temperatures, memory, motherboards, underestimation of the frequencies of stone and other problems.

Mars_City
Mars_City wrote:
high-end Intel. So as not to mess with temperatures, memory, motherboards, underestimation of the frequencies of stone and other problems.
Oh, and like you said about acceleration.
AMD set and forget, Intel should be driven.

Lex-one wrote:
Here let's compare, especially in 4K.
In 4k on a par +/- there and there. But I don't like the lack of a good overclocking from amd for the money!