Accessories

DarkNezias [Gebeine]
Junior subfragment — GeForce GTX 1070 (review) attracts much stronger. All because of the price tag. The bottom bracket to the second power "Pascal", let me remind you, is $ 380. The graphics card is comparable in performance with the GeForce GTX 980 Ti

DarkNezias [Gebeine]
https://www.ferra.ru/ru/system/review/experiment-cpu-for-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-1080/

Alex.1988
There are games for the game that 4к60фпс on ultra, iron does not exist. Even sly from 1080ti bent

One comp and all the rules

burn consolato
NDes
For 1080p card gtx1070 completely without compromise enough. But for 4K it clearly enough, but you have to take 1080ti for 1080 or 4K - a good question. Strix-you're a good cooling and quietness, they have passive mode.

Eugene Astrakhan
Watched 1080ti pulling 4k in modern games) or she does not pull! If only to make settings on the lowest)

bosser2407
There are games for the game that 4к60фпс on ultra, iron does not exist. Even sly from 1080ti bent
I do not argue. Is! I saw myself!

MagicHero why you GTX 1080, if you have a GTX 1070? For 15% performance, which is produced by the clocking? Then at least GTX 1080 Ti. In General, the following spring Volta - purchase Pascal (especially if you have quite a powerful card) is irrational, because the 10 series is living out its last months. Then output 20-series and tacomania.

Already he began to collect the money, leaving Volta to sell urgently 1060 GTX and buy a GTX 2070 (or GTX 2060 in the worst case). But to deny yourself all still have, because you need to pull i7-8700K/9700K, 16 Gb DDR4-2666 and ASUS STRIX Z470/370 GAMING E. is to Take all the credit for two years no desire.

Andreabocelli
Passive mode now has all the maps from 300 dollars. But this mode is complete crap and I have it turned off because the card is in idle and do not hear-but it is not heated under 50 degrees and always cold(27 degrees)-so the thermal paste can be longer not to change-and the overall temperature in the body low.But to each his own.

warp 37
Well 1080 as it also accelerates and in iron 1080 faster by 25% compared to the 1070. There are already a lot of games that I play and which lacks a bit of performance. Volta waited, thought that was coming out in the fall and then postponed for spring, and even Huang writes that only the production of the chip is 1000 bucks (this is speaking about the full) so what's the situation like with VEGA. Better take it now 1080 and play than half a year for the same money to take 2070 with almost the same performance.

MagicHero, well GTX 2070 performance should be more powerful than the GTX 1080 Ti. In any case, if you lack the GTX 1070, it is not enough for GTX 1080 (I know its not enough). Full uncompromised experience in FHD and QHD while that may give only a GTX 1080 Ti.

Well, in mainstream Volta will surely be chips and GV104 GV106 and GDDR6, not GV110 and HBM2. Mainstreaming Pascal on HBM2 was not released. In any case, a new architecture is worth the wait for the tensor of the nuclei and a new type of VRAM.

warp 37
Take for example assasin creed syndicate there when spage 4 1070 drawdowns are below 60, take the last lark there in space 2 already had to abandon the ultra shadows, take the division with the maximum drawdown also the shadows are and shade there is just great, take batman arkham knight there smoothing miserable and I play at 2K resolution, so the picture was clearer and 1070 are also a little miss at some points, we take the GTA 5 1070 holds 8x antialiasing but at the limit with subsidence, take the Witcher 3 in there with hairline and + improved Lody and improved shadows in 2-4 times procedeed sometimes fps below 60, far cry primal will be playing in 2K resolution, shadow warrior 2 game dinamina and play at 120 fps, 1070 on the ultra are often drawdown. So as you can see, the transition is not so meaningless.
Let's just say if the game on 1070 gives 55 fps on 1080 will be around 65 i.e., to hold that 60 under equal settings.
warp 37 wrote:
Well, in mainstream Volta will surely be chips and GV104 GV106 and GDDR6, not GV110 and HBM2. Mainstreaming Pascal on HBM2 was not released. In any case, a new architecture is worth the wait for the tensor of the nuclei and a new type of VRAM.
Why do you need the tensor kernel? in games they still will not enter to calculate intelligence in the coming 2 years after the release of Volta. Already easier for Pascal to sit out and buy the next generation of volts when its already run-in and games will start to use the achievements.

MagicHero, well, if you principally the difference in 7-10 FPS is a personal matter. Just be prepared for the fact that i5-3570K will have to Stoke it at least to 4.7 GHz.

MagicHero
I have 1080ti Lara, the Witcher and Batman are going at top speed with x8 anti-aliasing is clearly 60 fps. because the monitor is 60Hz, no more issues. And it's gonopores i7 930k first generation and Menarini on pcie 2.0, and veducha generally below 3.0. Ie vidyuhi decides and drags relatively old hardware.

MagicHero wrote:
take batman arkham knight there smoothing miserable and I play on 2K resolution
clocked shlasko panel NVIDIA, what's the problem

warp 37
warp 37 wrote:
well, if you principally the difference in 7-10 FPS is a personal matter. Just be prepared for the fact that i5-3570K will have to Stoke it at least to 4.7 GHz.
The difference is 5-10 fps just decides sometimes whether the game is going steady at 60 or subsidence. About the processor it holds 60 fps, okay, I get 100 and more fps is not necessary. Yes and soon going to move to 8600К how come the price settles.
lookaway
In fact the problem is that this will do nothing already visited.

Alex.1988
Quietly.

To stick Pascal on Intel Core I7-4770K.. well good luck to you. :)
Your bluff will be cheap and bezvygulnym, that I can Wanganui. :D)

MagicHero, I would suggest the i7-3770K. A month ago, he took it. Compared to the i5-3570K, CPU load, twice fell.

lokkie, you would have jabbed your Core 2 Duo in the dustbin, where it has long place is no disgrace.