FPS | Comfortable playing | Low | Smooth (The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt)
I have a not so powerful laptop (CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4030U, 1.9 GHz, video card: Nvidia Geforce GT 840m, 2 VRAM RAM: 6,00 GB). Played Batman: Arkham Knight on minimum at 1280x720 at 20-30 fps. I'm such a fan of the series and of Batman in General. Recently tried the Witcher. At 1280x720 at the minimum from 25 to 40, depending on where you are located - city or open area. So. I read a review of the incentive that people have played 600 hours in the Witcher at 15 fps. Question: would you, if you really want to go, to play the Witcher on minimum 20-30 fps? My opinion - the main thing that was all smooth, with no brakes, then everything will be OK, even at 24 fps. Now, I want to buy a yoke and play in this mode. How do you think I am fool?Well, I wouldn't have to play on minimum with 20-30 fps, especially such a cool game.
Better wait to buy new hardware or console and go there, he waited 2 years until I bought a console and there was a good picture and the smoothness that is necessary.
I had a laptop Gt 650m 2GB, 8Gb Ram, all settings in the Witcher were on high (not ultra) except for shadows, hair and water. At a resolution of 1600x900 was about 20-30фпс and it does not hurt to enjoy the atmosphere. No lags, no wild drawdowns did not notice. So if you really want to play, the problems here don't see :)
On the minimum salary and with additional settings in W3HC, went a few times with 11-18 FPS
I passed the first time GTS450 on average 30 fps, then when I bought a 780ti sorry that have already passed this game on gunarante, because you could wait a bit and go with maximum comfort.
I played padmaka 2 in the pile while superhuman with reduced resolution 30 pipes but zapredelno as
finally as if the question is not so much the smoothness of how many I've got at least 25 tepees at maximum settings
latest Igor I played like it was oblivion. maybe even the first padmaka have zacatepec with low fps and disrespect level of grafana. then I was listed to consider ultramax 30 fps and native resolution monitor. if the couple is not satisfied this game is better to postpone and not to horati.
Answering a question say, you're completely wasted, but to tell you I do not see sense :D Not the first time I hear that people with low FPS to play, so a flag in hands)))
Marquess
dude, don't listen to smart commenters above. I have the same laptop but only percents i5 4210m. The Witcher is on average 30 fps. Download first and try the pirates and there, if rules go buy it.
If you're okay and you like the game then buy it, I remember a time when I did Assassin's Creed II with 10fps on average and nothing of harm in it no, you just can be frustrating. Before he upgraded iron, was the Witcher with 20 frames on average, and the thrill of the game I absolutely didn't.
and, posony! I remembered I demo kruzisa played with 5 ppsmi about. then I optimized a little and going somewhere with peresadkami under 20 cars half as say skolki almost maksimalka. then I got a Radeon 3870, I thought that the most intelligent and those with 65 nanometer processor will be the God of acceleration. the result is something like finished at max without spawania 24-25 fps.
so okazyvaetsa I've been dirty CeleronTM