FPS peck boyars! (Mass Effect: Andromeda)
guys have the following configurationi5 6500
gtx 1060 6 gb
16 gb ozy
on ultra settings with enabled vs (vertical sync) the game runs 60 fps (loc gertsovki) but there are drawdowns of up to 25 (seconds 2) basically 80% of the game the fps 60 and does not move
this curve optimization?because the game of graphene is at least not very,and the more voracious the Witcher 3 is always 60 without a problem
DragonXXXV
so graphene and the engine is not far away from IU 3.it was on the bucket to play
Yes bugs what is H-0 that there, on the asteroid, when the map of this system and look at the bright star, the lag from 60 to 25.
it's always 60, well, sometimes fall a bit for unknown reasons.
28-37 where that is so there are drawdown when you sit down to a planet where in min. 4-6 all the rules.
The config is not all for the game - after all, it is important that hangs in the background, what with the wood/BY, well, a trivial extension of the screen... well here it is and 750ti someone plays - and komuto and 1060 little output?...
RX460 4gb 40-60 fps on medium
on gtx 1080 also have drawdowns, even on ultra, at least at the minimum salary. freezes completely, especially in the scenes when you change the camera view. geometry slowpoke always connected, creating a few seconds of the brakes when removing the game from the pause, abrupt change of species, or when the location + change the camera in the dialogues.
on the same map the Witcher 3 superdaniel recommended and maximum hair+smoothing them never sags, even in Novigrad and toussainte.
there is no pitch-nobility will not help.
Bomber
to play with graphene 2010,the card in the head.Lara Croft,Witcher,Midlands much prettier and more stable work.and this YR is why it is sinking.yell with legs of the character while running (2к17....)
percent stuff drive a RAM and lower some of the settings for the i5 without very much proseriata in new games where you need at least (max) 8 cores (threads)
Gryxa
well, it's a relative term.
In Lara Croft 2013, the dialogue is better than in some modern games it goes to 60 fps on any low end shit 2016
On a similar config:
[email protected]
1060@2000/9200
16 gb ddr3 1866
Have on ultra is almost stable 60+, the incidence is up to 40, but rare and mostly in cutscenes, so I consider it not critical.
Only shadows reduced to high, as someone said, put that much performance. To reduce it reduced, but did not check, probably not worth it. :)
as read in the title barons almost slyvanus, resist to do it here.
everything will go back to Steam and Windows.
on my system there is a drawdown, it is 60 fps, then drops to 20 for a second, go into the pause and go and fps sags to 12, then leveled to 60, the ship was 60 fps on the planet, then 60, then like lightning zhakhnet can sink up to 23, but maybe not to sink, I do not understand which option will deliver as much system, download percent above 45% does not rise, some for 60 fps loaded with 75% somewhere, sometimes even lower. In short XS so squander fps. Consumption of VRAM to 2900мб comes
Steve Taller
Most likely lighting because the abrupt change of view, change the illumination, so-and strokes of lightning. Try to play with lighting and effects.