Built-in graphics card.

jsnx wrote:
apex full hd all at a minimum of 90-100 fps is this normal???
What do you want ? It rules.

you're fine. the CPU budget and outdated, and the graphics card is low budget.
and between tests on YouTube and reality is always a huge gap, even if the hardware is identical.

bloomm
just the old r9 280x identical fps was(((

legusor
and if the percent change that would be better? or need another mother to change?

jsnx
On xeon or i7 3770 i7-2600 apex eats percent load, look at the map when you drop there is probably 70 percent of the download in batches most likely, too, from here and the fps is less, when replacing you'll gain + 20-30 frames and less stable framrate

Download msi afterburner and attitude, there can be deduced the loading and temperature of the CPU, graphics card, etc.
If the graphics card downloaded below 99%, the game depends on the processor.

bloomm
in any situation percent is loaded on 90-100% and vidyuhi drops from 100 to 30 just even fight when no ((((( this is the problem with percent?

jsnx wrote:
this is the problem with percent?
It's not a problem percent, the game went eating =) If you would 3570к could Dopinat to 4.5 ghz wouldn't be a problem. Too much would =) In your case, the percent change or play, so, in principle 90-100 for the shooter from 1 person to more than.

jsnx
The game rests on the PERC, if you want more fps, you will have to change a bunch of percents+mother+of RAM on modern, although for me, 100 fps is enough, if not the players.
By the way, the monitor is greater than 100 Hz produces? If not, then not worth the bother.

IOne86
144((( so I play on the minimum salary, thanks for Council))))

jsnx
Because the card is underused, not necessarily all set to minimum, you can put high textures, antialiasing, etc. options that stresses only the video card, not the processor.

Texture processing to the graphics card, and output images to the monitor, they are completely different indicators.
The graphics card can handle 240 frames, but on the monitor it displays the standard 30/60 frames.
Sound standard 30/60 frames, and a violation of the standard is punishable by law.

if I am not mistaken the cards 280х and 570 are almost identical and all sorts of some 290 390 480 580 cards thicker

MunchkiN 616
RX570 two times more powerful 280x !

X_ray_83
stream processors 2048
t-units 128
ROP 32
both cards only have 570 frequency is higher but not much like tou. total memory bandwidth is suddenly worse than 280х. ААААааа111 2 times more powerful than peck-peck

MunchkiN 616
X_ray_83
https://www.gpucheck.com/ru-rub/compare/amd-radeon-rx-570-vs-amd-radeon-r9-280x/intel-core-i7-7700k-4-20ghz-vs-intel-core-i7-3770k-3-50ghz/
A difference of 35%

Lex-one
MunchkiN 616
The numbers everything is fine, but in games 100% of the difference is due to the new GCN architecture 4.0 ! Old architecture AMD doesn't support it is just the 270x,280x,290X,370,380 x except 390), especially in the new API DX12 and Vulkan.
Because in reality it is so and not otherwise )))

MunchkiN 616
Then he GPU the L2 cache is two times faster in RX570 vs 2mb 768KB !
MDE... I miss my friends with them it was interesting to talk about it, you even basic merge (((

X_ray_83
somewhere in the region of the limit of 30% before referred to Lex-one - or so we thought.
plus card with 4хх series although not sure, like, taught to identify the bitness of a floating-point number before the account and now the card can read the types from F8-16-32 separately. although this theme I'm not particularly interested. with asynchronous Shader I think it can give between 3-5% and the card will be less work and more turboboosting theory.
well, like all.
2 times faster in my understanding it means in hard modes, let's say it was 10-15фпс was the 20-30фпс. such as occurs with multigpu. or was it the 50 became 100. this is a 100% increase
even on your chart I 100% do not see
and so it is in fact in the study of high cards namely 290 and conditionally all of the performance threshold (this is the 2014-15 year) - in games and benchmarks I special advantages of the architecture is not observed. there is a difference in frequency mostly. and I have a AMD raden conditional level of performance which is 7970 GHz edishen (this is the 2012-13 year) - a kind of low cards (280х by the way something similar to it but the architecture there is probably another).
then there are furies and other arts which VEGA and VEGA 56 and 64 of this vicious circle come together with the last there is a top card to 16GB VRAM.
дх12 I do not take into account because AMD does not support drivers DHR and not in a hurry to start it looks like tou. in the volcano and дх12 slightly increases performance in some applications such as relatively of NVIDIA but not relative to its lineup of AMD. there may be more potential... peck-peck compared to NVIDIA 980-1060
this is a predictive empirical Peck's arithmetic