New games not for us
Sometimes it seems to me that all the players who have long and faithfully observe the evolution of game development is simply no longer fit into the plans of developers of AAA innovations. And there are a great many objective reasons. Listed with Imhonet:1) We know what the game. I propose to recall as did the warm tube games. If RPG the bet was for the story and the lore instead of leveling up to ultimate and infinite Grinda belongings. If there was a shooter or action from the abundance of action, the adrenaline already in his pants, and not the same thing in a different wrapper. Overall was very fun.
2) We know how much of the game. I suggest to everyone to remember a time when Steam was warm and the lamp. For 500 wood you can take the game with all the DLC and that's without discounts. Yes, and the game was normal.
3) We have no time to talk about it. Seriously, have you seen the big, fat public discussion about what someone something in the game not like it? I'm not. Except that the fun which absolutely nothing changed. Now, if there was a public outcry...
4) Games are really shit. I am sure that many bought the last game was the Witcher 3. And it is not surprising that similar games in quality not seen since the release of the Witcher 3.
5) Everywhere the sect are happy. There is a generation of young nyufagov. And they are willing to Shavat anything. They are moving the industry toward the finish okazualivaniya. Notably, for all not lost his brain. But it is proved that when a developer starve the developer begins to operate as proposed and in favor of quality.
6) Everywhere this Denuvo. Who was the first to say that it does not cause performance issues?
EVA Angelina
The Witcher has paid off before release. With the help of pre-orders.
falsh777
With clause 5 does not agree with you, children do not care what to play, and my childhood was also played in all that was just to play. Well, the prices say thank you to ruble for this is not only to the price of the game is, and ALL.
EVA Angelina
you do not understand anything ,if people were not greedy and kansoli nobody bought, then developed have used the power of PC to make a classy, beautiful ,big games and not scored on optimization and bugs, and the new fall is insanely far from even the previous parts, this degradation cantolina, with the Fig optimization ,and consolenum... everyone
MunchkiN 616
I would say that...the only AAA exclusive peak pissed away because of their greed that's all. It is a fact. More exclusives of this magnitude peak to be seen. And then water is poured )
falsh777
I do not understand what you say have nothing good doing, is to play the junk, it turns out that New Vegas game. Give the example of NFS, in which improvement is not observed, they say that a worthy successor to appear now. ) I'm confused. I just want to say that the industry is not the same kloha as you perceive it. It is moving in the right direction, all good.
grafonoman
you do not understand. Nobody would nothing insolvent on the platform didn't do..except some loot for cartoon sold, because not buying, on the net not play.
EVA Angelina
And I'm not saying a worthy successor within these lines. Or even are part of some line.
Kryogen
No, it's greedy publishers. They sell digital goods. Which unlimited availability. Here is how to estimate the cost of the copies? Personally, I don't know. And generally want a photocopy of the money to pay. Copy to the copy and everything is fair.
falsh777
without a doubt, there are some not very pleasant moments..type of DLC for headlights edge 4..which in fact, at times, we need to sue. But it costs the market, I would say. Earlier nebylo DLC ? So early and the game was worth 3 pennies of the 3 pixels is made by 3 Indians. DLTS is a necessity. Everyone wants more money. Nothing to worry about. You are not forced to buy them. Another thing, when I want you to pay for pumping in 5 Forze, to open or buy a new car..Yes..really. Well Forza 5 not evaluated, so the authors don't do that anymore.
EVA Angelina
To pay for DLS more than a game, I will not. And if the game nevyhoda a bunch of DLS, I always demand a refund.
falsh777
Oh and don't pay ) you who makes it..opal same DLTS DLTS strife. For fins of AC and the Witcher came out great DLC. To pay for them not ashamed
The point is not that games used to be better. Yes, the cases when the game makes an exact copy of the previous or not at all what was promised. But did before is not seen? Yes, in the days of the NES and dandy doing the same! Vystrelivshey game rivet similarily and nobody was against. Most likely the reason that in those days had not yet FatCat and due to the lack of Internet less shared their views - and this is the main reason for the mass hatred of something. Simply herd effect.
Another reason is a matter of habit. Insert an example from myself - in the days when it was the fashion for shooters I simply did not have a computer and quake on the PS1 for me the small was too complicated. I spent days zadrotil in Crash and Spyro and that probably taught me to arcade shooter. Shooters are not interested from the word no. Later when everything was already cut in NFS I have a computer at all was not only what I was able to play Oddworld on your computer father. So race in my opinion is the most boring genre there is.
What modern game doesn't meet expectations just the same proof of the fact that they are changing. A conveyor - just the chorus of the flock, the Assembly line has always been, and always will be, just because it is profitable.
Aips95
Yes, changing from the word degradation. I would have the pipeline was happy if not sasurali wide setting of the okazualivanie and other podniesienie.
falsh777
What can you do if the majority of people do not want to replay 1000 times one point in the game, for some hardcore players it can not be.
Aips95
Yes, what's hardcore when everything is on the web shitty story warring with common sense? Not everywhere of course, but it is. Returning to the example: compare 4 and Fallout NV. How do you like the plot of Mad Max? Maybe you heroes new liked all the previous parts? Yes, there is much to set an example nothing for vhlam were empty last year and this. Of course that's definitely not normal.
1)Have good games. There are bad games. And it does not depend on the date of issue of these games. About a ton slag 90 and zero a forgot at the hearing were only tube of the game. And now the slag stamp, but the mass is the very existence of the Internet does not allow the lovers of games so quickly separate the wheat from the chaff.
2)it is not the incentive, and even the ruble, just over the past 4 years the price of video games really skyrocketed in price. For example, the PC version of Skyrim was worth in 2011 of about$ 15, and now fall sell for 60. Perhaps this is a result of the increasing cost of games (the emergence of Motion Capture, for example), but then this trend picked up by many developers, even the producers of indie games.
3)on the Contrary, the critics became more. It is everywhere, just go to any gaming website, which publishes reviews and the comments under them. And earlier about the cons of the game it was possible to deduct only from a magazine, or find out from a narrow circle of acquaintances, such as gamers.
4)see A1.
5)Well can't say that very much pleased. Issue exactly what you are looking for anything from a total permissiveness. Had not downloaded the game from torrent, and went to the store and bought the disks (even pirated) and every game relished a very long time.
Of course, not without okazualivaniya, partly agree.
Wild Rider wrote:
On the contrary critics have become more
Only she weakly active. Like farting in a puddle.
Wild Rider wrote:
About a ton slag 90 and zero a forgot at the hearing were only tube of the game.
Well, I do not remember that around the slag was a rush. Now buy Far Cry Primal saratikov is quite equivalent to the iPhone 6th among the ladies. And what I remember about the good only good. The sample is what games should be. And when I say you're wrong and the game should be OK and you Tama run from point a to point B by the end of sujecki. And you go and poke a heretic in old school, rich story and it is desirable not deprived of grafon.
Developers spend half the money on this Denuve (one word*contrib), but not in the game. they choose Denuvo because pirates crack their games, and income from decrease.But for gamers, this protection is not necessary.
Was an interesting game. Sometimes new versions of these games were not interesting (Орион2 vs Орион3, for example).
Has always been and will play interesting and not interesting.
falsh777
falsh777
6) Everywhere this Denuvo. Who was the first to say that it does not cause performance issues?
I have to say. And I like that dick on the other! Never experienced performance issues. And if someone is a little, let him lengthen his bucket and their attraction to be able to have no loot, and the money to shut up, not thump, and in a measure to drink, not women tra......s and the money they spend, and favorite to find, and not on porn bullshit sub FR......th. Bought everything, went through all the games with denuevo waiting for the Great dlc of the Witcher and the transition in the future to the divine Volta - the rest, Yes, let the entire galaxy on fire.
For many, the fascination with computer games had on the Golden Age of game making. The rapid growth of computing power, many young studios, enthusiastic people were doing their best, though it doesn't always work. Pilot projects, many of which have turned out if not masterpieces, then at least just a rung below. And now we have tattooos. Fresh ideas a little, no one wants to risk the pipeline is churning out dozens of clones annually. We need a serious breakthrough in the industry, changing everything at once, then those who are not afraid to create in new conditions, will be given a pack of masterpieces. As always, masters open direction, and then lapping it for easy loot incompetent artisans and foul, the wizard opens the next area. Humanity lives in its history.