People's power
---People - a loose concept. If the whole biomass, I'm against that kind of power. But if the selection, for example, in intelligence only. But when in human history this happened.
Do the lower classes that they can't count on the power itself, but only its control?
I see someone under the name Mayamenstate, trying to prove something or provoke, and maybe he's the king of some unknown country, a country with a truly national government. So it is diagnosed with autism on the basis of delusions of grandeur.
I've read the author's themes and still have no clue where he ultimately wants us to bow :)
Well... apparently his point of view, can understand only his own reflection in the mirror.
Mayamenstate
You see too highly of yourself, just think that I need to read your galimatias foot.
And after the vodka I found myself in this world of scientific atheism - I usually drink either beer or liquor. And then I realized that scientific atheism arises from a vodka....
This is no longer to pour.
China publicly condemned..... But did not enter because its troops, for example, on Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands
Yeah.... a conflict between China and the Soviet Union in the Sino-Soviet type ...never happened??
Mayamenstate
When the upper classes control the lower classes then is the power of the ordinary, and when the bottoms control tops - it's the people's power.
True, but this government is nowhere in fact, all the VIPs, the elite control the masses. Because the masses in General are not able to run the country.. sad fact. Should be, but I can't. You can check: anarchy engulf the society, for the society a lot of corrupt and cattle - they will interfere with all ways and will attempt to become the power which overthrew the people.
In Russia overthrew the upper lower classes /peasants-nobles/ in 1917 and came to power
In Russia came to power, not proletarians, but all the same the elite and vicious freaks by hook or by crook. Ordinary people have been used as a weapon, and then was forgotten, as usual. Maidan 2014 the same example. The slogans of down with corruption and oligarchs" good, but the result of what? One elite replaced another, and dealt with their enemies. The people ruled? No, the people were used and thrown away, but publicly all so beautifully described, education potsreotizma there and all that.
In principle, there is no solution. Theoretically there is, but it's beyond real. In theory, the people must evolve and become a little different: pure and single solid mechanism in unified ideals and goals. Such people don't exist, all flawed individuals and a lot of them in all strata of society.
Mayamenstate
one question why are you a head clog, it's not important who is at the bottom and only important who is top and who would tall tale an egoist)
In General, it is difficult to create a national representation in government at least impose a lien on elections, for a fee not everyone can afford, but you can create something like a state exam with the required knowledge for the position, but the power of the people as a whole cannot be created, except that a revolutionary way, and then not always.
It's better like this than people power. Red-assed beggars in 1917 doprygat - still disentangle.
Now in Russia people power or regular?
People's power in our country was only in Soviet period, now, as throughout the civilized world ruled by the System, from the opinions of ordinary people do not depend.
people always gave peccary power so to some extent all power is the people's
the current issue of how monopolized Vasto, her succession how strong positions of authority and how people can affect the policies of their government.
periodically when people accumulate social and latent mass becomes more active a lot and people are supported or are unsupported by some leaders. then pitch it is clear that the people's power grows over a certain majority or boholst.
And now in Russia, the people's power or normal?
They don't know.
Do the lower classes that they can't count on the power itself, but only its control?
Yes, I understand you.
Mayamenstate
I think you're fixated on bottoms and top ) In principle, the only important qualities and skills that are owned by a particular person regardless of skin color, race, blood and origin. No matter where I grew up in a rich or poor family. That's who this is all important and the jerk with a set of stupid stereotypes and narrow thinking. The assessment of the individual must go to really important criteria, and not nonsense, fascist, racist and so on.
Akruti
In the Soviet period there was no people's power )) had the same System, just a little differently than in the West. But the elite, cronyism, bureaucratic bullshit it all was. No ties a little that you could obtain, even if they had a right to it. For example, not all could give the child to a daycare that was near the house: for the System played no role a location home and at school, the System itself was largely irrational, and therefore unjust. It was certainly better than now, but the people were few )
The assessment of the individual must go to really important criteria, and not nonsense, fascist, racist and so on.
I'll tell you, if I were to sling shit and call for adjustment in the number of persons who:
1) Take jobs away
2) the Export of capital from the country
3) Select outlets
4) Spread drugs
5) Satisfied with their orders
6) Spoil the gene pool
As there is some kind of anti-fascist and rusofobno NIT that I'd be called a Nazi/racist :)
So who has more nonsense remains to be seen.
It was certainly better than now
It depends. I, frankly, socialism is not love.