And what you should be doing yourself? It is all? (Battlefield 1)
Hello, recently played a single BATTLEFIELD 1, it seemed to me not very install, but some of the stories were really interesting (like the story about gambling and pilot, and about the desert of stealth). But what would you like in a single new part of the battle? Was it worth doing battle razrezannoy to pieces? It may be worthwhile to do it alone. Maybe just longer?I always thought that in the battle for the multi rerub buy. There's even statistics are not all run alone.
Xenomorph_drone
I don't think. I've personally liked the solo. And in the game is denovo. Cartoon (honestly) did not like at all.
And Yes, right now, always need profii..
.png)
Kevlon
4 and 3, Yes, but there are already more people interested in a loner. Yes and I liked it more than the multiplayer.
Single battlefield bad company 2 was the only good one among the whole series of battles, although they were similar to CoD Modern Warfare 1. Here, the loner is not enough that disparate, but probably also the shortest in total from all parts of the battle.
More missions like the opening. More bots. The scale in General.
And that in the tank mission normal breakthrough is only 1 missiia, then stealth and skarima in the corners.
The pilot rules only in the sky, the ground mission is also Stasova, though, she's fit, I agree. And on the dirigible - all chic.
The Balkans are all very sad, the fuss some, and not offensive.
Here in the Alps mission fit, I would like more of these, but in different scenery and the people more.
In the desert, like, not bad, but there is a focus on stealth, and given that almost all of the game with emphasis on stealth, you're already sick of it.
Now, if there's something similar it would be, I would do ofigevali.
It's a multiplayer of Operatii without the interface. Fit well well well!