GTX 970
how much more it will be relevant? don't want to spend money again every year the same thing sell for half price last buy a new one but changed can't see for five yearsIn that two 970 standards)
A little better than Titanic.
But if SLI is in the game well done.
playing on a laptop with a 650 card and rules are not worried GTA 5 is on medium high DotA 2 on max as well far cry 4 rushing
ZiZu Zankercu
th? well ka, dear friend, tell me, which game I have with this card at max speed of 30 fps?
I have the Witcher DSR + graphic mods with maximum graphics goes to 40-45 fps. in PCD 60 fps! ( in Novigrad, Yes to 40 drops, but there are textures in 4K)
4 battles - 60 fps, GTA 5 - 60 fps, Yes even the ARC I goes to 45 fps!
so that garbage does not carry it!
Do not try to prove the opposite.
970 pulled and pulls the vast majority of the game on high at 60 fps. Just as well he has the owners 980ti purchased mom, I am learning to show my dominant position, here they are talking shit, rocking his cards in front of each other =)
Not important that the 970 owners know the true answer to the question?
PS I take the 970 is already 1 year and 5 months. Whether I am happy? Crazy. The nearest upgrade plan only after a year (if you continue the current pace of development schedules and increasing demands, and will not jumps). Yes, in the fall I most likely will not be able to play in new products at maximum 60 fps. But there is great difference between high and very high? Often it even under a magnifying glass not to notice =)
Don't understand why everyone is being so horrible to this 970, I have many years worth, and nothing, absolutely everything that comes out pulls at max speed and not work. I think its another year or so 3 will suffice.
Allaxeon wrote:
Don't understand why everyone is being so horrible to this 970, I have many years worth, and nothing, absolutely everything that comes out pulls at max speed and not work.
Yes, the kids-haters generally. Do not pay attention.
Allaxeon wrote:
I think its another year or so 3 will suffice.
it appears that you probably got excited..
GG4 wrote:
Not to change every year, you need to take top. 970-I was weak, mediocre graphics even at the time.
It is such thin trolling, I presume? For if it is written seriously, you should see a doctor. Today 970-I, as well, and at the time, great card for FHD resolution. For a year there are two such cards in sly, all the games are pulled by a decent margin in resolving 2560х1080, what can I say about FHD...
history 900 series similar to 600
the difference between the 670 and 680 was also not significant and the first with magic chasing it with a to the level of the second
but they were after the release of the 780 ti and nobody really need and performance is weak.
there is likely history will repeat itself so as for example the assassin syndicate 980 pulls no margin of arbitrariness completely. gta5 is also. not to mention all the quantum talkie.
in the future it is logical to expect that games will use more memory and to load more.
so the 970 cards were good only within his generation. future or sly of them but as memory is still not enough either and actually the new generation. for example 1070. the year will be fine to dissect the game at 50-60 fps.
In order not to produce a new theme, how much Gigabyte GeForce GTX 970 G1 Gaming to sell now ? Box is, the pamphlets of all sorts. The map about 2 years.
yesterday successfully pushed into the system unit which assembled to order.given for 16000 a year guarantees G1 from gigabyte.the person is happy as an elephant after ha ha 7600GT
Like a lot of haters who spread rot 970... This card will be relevant at least for another 2 years and will pull everything perfectly on FHD. Having read the article on left-wing websites, behold roundnose tests and consider themselves connoisseurs in the selection of graphics cards. To 970 stood 560 4 years and pull even the Witcher 3 on high at a stable 30 fps, GTA 5 - 30 fps. 970 now safely pull any game in FHD 60 fps, same goes BF1 70-90 fps safely. 10ХХ version I have as it is a repetition of history with 6xx, like new, allegedly more powerful than the 5xx was, but in actual fact the difference was only memory and nothing more. So if you take 9хх series now, then calculate what will be done SLI, but it is better to have to wait 1ххх series.
Maxximka_UA
Stick or what? What not to take 10xx series, if people have outdated card, or from scratch a new computer, what not to take, especially if you have the money??? I replaced 780 to 1060, and I do not regret it and I was now pleasing to the eye a view (MSI X), the silence, the temperature and power consumption, memory more than 2 times, is also very good, year 3 will sit quietly with a slight decrease graphics quality.
Maxximka_UA
also picked up the 970 after 560 ,played to the last ,reduced the settings to low ,but AC unity 560 gave up and had to take a new
GTX 970 almost 2 years ,stalling the games if not on ultra, then a mixture of ultra and high is quite enough ,it's only victims of marketing will change the ninth series of the tenth ,Yes there is growth in the 10 and 20 frames ,but when a new vidyuhi raises fps from 40-80 80-100 ,that's nonsense ,since to the eye the difference is almost not visible ,and off for that 20-50K of nonsense
If the fan of the graphics ,that card is me when she is going to give less than 30 FPS on medium settings and the picture you just not satisfied .
And from my experience it is not necessary to take the top decisions ,as they grow old,possibly with a gap year ,but perplata in 10K or more is not justified.
I would advise you to take it the last series, and at least 1070 PECs, if stocks allow...if a more modest budget then 1060 PECs, all the same, what would the reserve was.....
As the owner of a 980-Oh say - norm map has already been almost 2 years use and I think that is still the same amount it can lend. (especially now more and more drawn to podrzavati...) But, of course, if all the graphics sliders to twist in max power, and VRAM will be enough. But on high everything is stable at 60 fps is.
Timur Akilov
970 to change to 1060? are you all healthy? these identical cards in performance even price ,what sense to change sewed on soap?or fork out 32K for a 1070 for a change of personnel in battle from 90 to 110, and the like in other games? if you suffer hernia and the mother supports the sly ,then buy a second 970 and play further with the addition of 30 fps ,but Proactiv 20K ,not 32 and get more boost .
warp 37
the lack of video memory it compensates for RAM ,it's easier to buy a few straps for 6K than a new vidyuhi 20+
SPR1GGAN, it makes sense to sell the GTX 970, throw it a little bit more money on a GTX 1060 and get the GTX 980 with six gigabytes. Will live much longer.
And compensation of memory - look comparison of the GTX 1060 1060 GTX 3Gb and 6Gb. The gap to 40% reach. The RAM speed is significantly lower than that of the memory that has performance. And the same will happen with the GTX 970/980.
warp 37
you compare in games 970 and 1060 look ,there is the difference in FPS is minimal ,the amount of memory in General has not any value ,since its lack ,vidyuhi pull the RAM without either drawdowns and losses ,the most striking example of borrowing cash memory are of the graphics core integrated into the processor ,do not have even his memory ,and quite a pull and гат5 CC,DotA ,gray only at the expense of frequencies .
P. S 980 will sdaetsa in the same time frame and 970 .