PVP LADDER (Diablo 2)
1. First of all who wants to participate writes in PM on the forum his accounts with pvp characters that he is going to get fair pvp, indicating their buildup. Approx.: *akk1; nickname; bone necromancer (the table will be a corresponding reduction bnec).
2. After such registration, these players have the data will fall in the ladder list in the following form:
3. Duels are Softcore Expansion.
4. All participants will have zero wr,% against the other builds in the ladder until he can play a duel with them.
5. Index wr,% specific duel will be based on the number of unique meetings. This means, if player 1 played against player 2 build at least 1000 times, but it is not played against the same builds in the ladder as the player 2, the resulting wr,% this duel will be averaged with the others have not played to avoid calculating the rating, only one frags. Thus, a particular duel in equal measure will affect the calculation of wr,%.
6. To play runes or other in-game values — driven players. To publish data of players in the leaderboard need mutual consent of both parties before the duel and the inclusion of the moderator fair pvp. This is in order to rule out fan duel from games on rating.
7. In order to avoid the so-called vifromline on nubah, that is, when one player intentionally gives in to others, it is proposed to introduce the lower threshold total win rate (twr,%), below which if the first is to get (less than 2% for example), then duel with him the other members of the ladder will just be deducted and not to influence their wr% and such a player will remain statistics of played duels. The lower threshold of the twr is set by the moderator of the ladder.
8. All data of played duels sent by the moderator, fair moderator of the pvp ladder, and in turn, the moderator of the ladder publishes it.
v.1.2:
9. Because non-ladder characters to intersect with the ladder can't in some games and for some players, time consuming and there is no desire to gather again the characters for pvp, there is a proposal to conduct parallel 2 League: landernau and non-ladder. If reset PvM-the ladder, the ladder characters from League just moved to non-ledgernew taking into account all dialed frags, but counted afresh indicators wr%, taking into account the existing players accounts in a non-ladder League.
10. Expressed the idea of automation of conducting very difficult and costly to implement, and the result of the neglect by the administration intervention in the subject of this topic, her need only the attraction of the moderators fair games.
Add v.1.3
This will certainly be useful to know players interested in how this will work in General, including, and materiel to this idea. Let us examine some of the controversial issues:
11. Mirrorwriting
For example, in the ladder created 4 players who have coldsore (csor) with nicknames in the table below. The first number is the number of won duels against the player in the column, the second - total number of played duels against him.
Buildup one, respectively, as it will be considered, you ask? Very simply, it will be calculated taking into account the arithmetic mean, for example, we count on the wr coldsore against coldsores player cold_one:
wr% cold_one (vs csor) = ((5/11)+(7/21)+(4/7))/3*100% = 45,31%
Can see that the number of duels is not the deciding factor in counting, play at least 1000 times against one player of the same build will not give special advantages. Therefore, to set the overall rating, as mentioned, you need to play a lot of different duels.
12. Inactivity/deliberate draining of the rating
Suppose again that the player cold_four zaregalsya to the ladder, but didn't play any duel. The accumulation of all data of played duels all players zeros that player will be considered, and, therefore, slightly reduce the overall ratings of the other players. But due to the fact that the ladder will be updated periodically, this player will not be removed from the ladder, and just be paused, that is, in the future nick will be grayed out, i.e. marked as inactive and zeros on the calculation of rating other players temporarily will not affect. The player can remedy this situation, playing a duel against every other player in the ladder and in the future he will be able to fully participate in the rating.
Let us examine the situation where a player deliberately gives in to others, to increase the rating of the others. In this case, if it will be observed, given the fact that it will have too low rating (close to zero), it will also be paused, but a different color. The player can remedy this situation, but he will need to play a greater number of duels to get a plus. As you can see, doing this the player will be very inconsistent if he pleases again to climb the stairs of the ladder your character (this will be difficult).
13. Counting the total (TWR%) winrate
This figure is based on previous winrate xx,xx% against every build and will also be averaged. TWR% will be equal to the sum of all wr% (the table is xx,xx%) divided by the number of different delay, which will determine the players that fill the ladder. If you don't count the mirror of the duel, then the denominator is subtracted 1 when calculating.
14. The solution to the problem with a passive game
Then either leave as is, either of the following:
Solarpoolheater duel remains a classic - 5 minutes on 1 fighting game. No arrestov and other locations to replay. If a duel lasts more than 5 minutes, it can peregrevaetsya 1 time in the same location and if it is not known the result of the duel, then pasewada side on the decision of the moderator shall count or loss or such a duel will simply not be taken into account. Thus, both parties will be interested in timing the end of the duel.
In general, the idea is good. But I do not see practical application, fair pvp go the same people, still all and without ladder know who is worth what. And newcomers and those who play themselves in pleasure (if any at all) it is unlikely to attract, the opponent in the enigma with a fullpack of kp skilers or sc'shek demotivates. So it's a man for 20, it's a ceiling.
T-Fox
Ofige, read your posts above and eyes did not believe, you or re-asked for a new software, or you fell ill with some incurable disease :)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))):))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) and even without criticism, tro-lo-lo and throwing someone poop.... It's kind of bad.
Naww
Those who know each other, with each other and play somewhere in the girth. And beginners also want to play with their fathers, maybe they too will start to play well - and the same fathers have more variations with whom to fight. Where if they don't meet at the tournament? No, well, of course, there are options, but perhaps not all of them will suit.
yamas
When I was chatting, I was calling someone a pvp, no one was responding. I guess I did something wrong. And not there.
Torum.
If you called under the runes, then yes, because the newcomers though and beginners, but understand that under the runes to go to them is too early)
And there are those who run pvp not for the sake of excitement or earnings, but just for fun, as I for example, of course, if someone will splash saliva, and call under the runes then here is another thing ... )
Torum.
ea vsegda rad bil pvp
osobenno pod runi
no iz jelayuwix bil toka pirya i ewe para random noobov, kotorie dumali 4to telestomp hamerom eto > all
Are we going to shut up the pvm tournament? Pre-inventing fair-pv rules
PS is right there.
greenstyle
You lost that argument in advance. I'm too lazy to even start it. If you don't believe me, you can ask the locals who firkax is and who I am, what are famous. And your first mistake is that for you a wiki, written by nobes, is an authority.
bd_sm,' and what else is wrong with his post? or is it the 1001st time to "argue" with the pvpgn (or actually how the server works)? Or do you remember any argument from Firk about this?
everything is completely in the hands of the players. before, apparently, the admin was one of the most fascinated. He's lazily herding them.
yok0o
You've been played with of of of the ofc, no one else has responded. In the games fair some lefties sat and dogs from Oopsen, which forever afc firk did not arrange as an opponent.
ZRDn
Called just for a fan pvp, few could find. Basically, as I wrote, the dynamics responded.
Obsessed
That's the way it is. It's just that he's overvalued the gluten-free work. Servers that raise all sorts of nobs, sitting in the toilet with a laptop, fall from half a head from the efforts of anyone. It is because of the glitches of the server part of d2. Unrelated to the "confiscate pvpgn."
Greenstyle
The problem with these wikis is that the moderators are also nuba. And if you look at this log upstairs, you'll notice that I'm not an opponent of your idea. I'm only against its lopsided or crude implementation.
And about the local noobs, I recommend to ask.
bd_sm'TDPG, it's totally agreeable, it's unrealistic to judge the degree of complexity of the work that xs like others do. It's not going to be judged. longing in one - a resource, like, gaming, and the admin is enough only for the technical part. minimum interaction with the audience of players. At least he wrote from time to time: "Nicho Minjac will nibud, fse phn!", or the people believe, hopes. ;S