3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
a
annortheone 26.07.20 11:12 pm

PVP LADDER (Diablo 2)


1. First of all who wants to participate writes in PM on the forum his accounts with pvp characters that he is going to get fair pvp, indicating their buildup. Approx.: *akk1; nickname; bone necromancer (the table will be a corresponding reduction bnec).

2. After such registration, these players have the data will fall in the ladder list in the following form:


3. Duels are Softcore Expansion.

4. All participants will have zero wr,% against the other builds in the ladder until he can play a duel with them.

5. Index wr,% specific duel will be based on the number of unique meetings. This means, if player 1 played against player 2 build at least 1000 times, but it is not played against the same builds in the ladder as the player 2, the resulting wr,% this duel will be averaged with the others have not played to avoid calculating the rating, only one frags. Thus, a particular duel in equal measure will affect the calculation of wr,%.

6. To play runes or other in-game values — driven players. To publish data of players in the leaderboard need mutual consent of both parties before the duel and the inclusion of the moderator fair pvp. This is in order to rule out fan duel from games on rating.

7. In order to avoid the so-called vifromline on nubah, that is, when one player intentionally gives in to others, it is proposed to introduce the lower threshold total win rate (twr,%), below which if the first is to get (less than 2% for example), then duel with him the other members of the ladder will just be deducted and not to influence their wr% and such a player will remain statistics of played duels. The lower threshold of the twr is set by the moderator of the ladder.

8. All data of played duels sent by the moderator, fair moderator of the pvp ladder, and in turn, the moderator of the ladder publishes it.

v.1.2:

9. Because non-ladder characters to intersect with the ladder can't in some games and for some players, time consuming and there is no desire to gather again the characters for pvp, there is a proposal to conduct parallel 2 League: landernau and non-ladder. If reset PvM-the ladder, the ladder characters from League just moved to non-ledgernew taking into account all dialed frags, but counted afresh indicators wr%, taking into account the existing players accounts in a non-ladder League.

10. Expressed the idea of automation of conducting very difficult and costly to implement, and the result of the neglect by the administration intervention in the subject of this topic, her need only the attraction of the moderators fair games.

Add v.1.3
This will certainly be useful to know players interested in how this will work in General, including, and materiel to this idea. Let us examine some of the controversial issues:

11. Mirrorwriting
For example, in the ladder created 4 players who have coldsore (csor) with nicknames in the table below. The first number is the number of won duels against the player in the column, the second - total number of played duels against him.

Buildup one, respectively, as it will be considered, you ask? Very simply, it will be calculated taking into account the arithmetic mean, for example, we count on the wr coldsore against coldsores player cold_one:

wr% cold_one (vs csor) = ((5/11)+(7/21)+(4/7))/3*100% = 45,31%
Can see that the number of duels is not the deciding factor in counting, play at least 1000 times against one player of the same build will not give special advantages. Therefore, to set the overall rating, as mentioned, you need to play a lot of different duels.

12. Inactivity/deliberate draining of the rating
Suppose again that the player cold_four zaregalsya to the ladder, but didn't play any duel. The accumulation of all data of played duels all players zeros that player will be considered, and, therefore, slightly reduce the overall ratings of the other players. But due to the fact that the ladder will be updated periodically, this player will not be removed from the ladder, and just be paused, that is, in the future nick will be grayed out, i.e. marked as inactive and zeros on the calculation of rating other players temporarily will not affect. The player can remedy this situation, playing a duel against every other player in the ladder and in the future he will be able to fully participate in the rating.
Let us examine the situation where a player deliberately gives in to others, to increase the rating of the others. In this case, if it will be observed, given the fact that it will have too low rating (close to zero), it will also be paused, but a different color. The player can remedy this situation, but he will need to play a greater number of duels to get a plus. As you can see, doing this the player will be very inconsistent if he pleases again to climb the stairs of the ladder your character (this will be difficult).

13. Counting the total (TWR%) winrate
This figure is based on previous winrate xx,xx% against every build and will also be averaged. TWR% will be equal to the sum of all wr% (the table is xx,xx%) divided by the number of different delay, which will determine the players that fill the ladder. If you don't count the mirror of the duel, then the denominator is subtracted 1 when calculating.

14. The solution to the problem with a passive game
Then either leave as is, either of the following:
Solarpoolheater duel remains a classic - 5 minutes on 1 fighting game. No arrestov and other locations to replay. If a duel lasts more than 5 minutes, it can peregrevaetsya 1 time in the same location and if it is not known the result of the duel, then pasewada side on the decision of the moderator shall count or loss or such a duel will simply not be taken into account. Thus, both parties will be interested in timing the end of the duel.
184 Comments
Sort by:
b
bd_sm[TDPG] 19.11.20

Obsessed
As is and there is PVC, only cultural.

O
Obsessed 19.11.20

bd_sm,' and I'm telling you, it's melancholy. it's like a wooden toy or a sandbox with rubble. Basically, fun. only all the fun was clouded. and as is-am text edits make not fate - for it is not.

Z
ZRDn 19.11.20

moder even swung, even my opinion rubbed))

b
bd_sm[TDPG] 19.11.20

ZRDn
everyone has different competence, some have more, some have less
you can draw an analogy with NTS
they are attended by different people: PhDs, award winners, experienced engineers, just engineers, young professionals
all can speak within their knowledge and interests, discuss something, criticize, offer
no one's shutting anyone up.
but if a young specialist starts to show off a pancake, say he fumbles, just the rest of us don't know about it, and covers one of the really fumbling his diarrhea like the post above, he's not soft at first, and then not really pointing to his place, and that's the norm.

I don't have a personal dislike for TS, I don't have, I just have a healthy desire to pinch a young man with too long a nose.

add
overlooked your post above
well on it in general I disagree on all points
in the pvp-sandbox is not yet important knowledge of the game for the enemy, and in the top pvp decide very subtle nuances
so these dudes won't rise above a couple of steps in the table

and again, well, didn't win for you, but at least I have to go up in the prizes.
I didn't get up- where's the confirmation that you're fumbling?
Do you swear by your mom? Well, I'm sorry...

f
firkax 19.11.20

there are rumors that greenstyle presses the "z" button on their posts and the "complaint" button on strangers every 5 minutes

and what is discussed in this topic and so and so will sandbox, as well as all your softcore pontoons about pvp

Z
ZRDn 19.11.20

bd_sm[TDPG]
Tell me, why is this all? You want to do all this yourself and you have better ideas for the system than greena? Or do you have a pro-sar candidate who's eager to do all this?
there's just a healthy desire to pinch a young man's nose too long
that's the dislike of D
In general, I fall silent on this, or the moder will soon get tired of all this rubbing and he will go to the baths))

b
bd_sm[TDPG] 19.11.20

firkax
not grown pg to htz, it's a matter of many years

b
bd_sm[TDPG] 19.11.20

ZRDn
I'll answer the cash after 6/6

O
Obsessed 19.11.20

Jaws are wagging
firkax, between you there? ;-) You're hellishly trouble-free. :D

soft-spoken punts about pvp
that's a great phrase! :D

b
bd_sm[TDPG] 19.11.20

Obsessed
and brazenly lies in a nearby topic))

O
Obsessed 19.11.20

bd_sm, well, he wrote to me that he had never had a one-man. :S

b
bd_sm[TDPG] 19.11.20

Obsessed
abstract user firkax - did not possess
nothing was reported about the person behind the computer :D
outs it's the norm to separate the personality from the avatar by the full tomato and pretend that everything is fine

f
firkax 19.11.20

Obsessed
firkax, between you there?
Who are "you"?
You're the same party, don't get away with it.

O
Obsessed 19.11.20

bd_sm, it's called a lie. :-)

firkax, alas (or not alas), I am not a party to the party, where they know, who whose posts are plus and do not receive complaints to the madator. :-)

b
bd_sm[TDPG] 19.11.20

Obsessed
I sometimes get lost myself, that there is shameless, like shit under the door, trolling, and what - neurology.

f
firkax 19.11.20

Obsessed
I didn't talk about them.
you're a participant in spreading rumors
and what I wrote above is the hearing told to me by one of those who put it in this topic.

O
Obsessed 19.11.20

firkax, because one of the postings in this topic (except the two of us), has to do with the madars? Who is it? Ah, to be precise! It's BDSM!! :D
or is hearing just speculation? Heh.. How long I'm on a peg is always speculation. :S

A
Archon Guard 19.11.20

greenstyle
Here you came up with a table and is ready to lead it, but it is not enough that it worked to advertise in the chat and hold pvp tournaments giving prizes to the first places, it is necessary runes, a lot of runes, and runes have a dober-dog and the smears try to persuade them to sponsor, maybe still and will be che)
the most weighty argument in persuading these Freemasons to sponsoring is that people will need a lot of anich, for which they will go to ... )))

b
bd_sm[TDPG] 19.11.20

Archon Guard
Thinking of the child does not allow the development of events, in which he will have to invest financially. The organization and runes of children are waiting for the mother-admin. That's why nothing has been done so far, though it could have been. The topic wasn't born yesterday.

b
bd_sm[TDPG] 19.11.20

I did not lose sight of the idea that, if the admin, it would not hurt to draw these runes for retention, for example, the first place for some time.

That's what I'm talking about. All that children plan and do without the support of their mother will be and done childishly, that is, for nothing, in fantasies.