Whether to take under the comp 1060 GTX 3GB?
Rate my trough if I should take a GTX 1060 3GB (power supply stop) or my percent don't get it and I just spend the money in vain?Intel Core i5-3470 CPU 3.20 Ghz
Ram 8Gb
GeForce GTX 660 2GB
Thought from your trough the clip to put on the ancient bucket of his wife, and myself to improve fps.
Metallov3r
Yes, take it. Percent will pull out easily. Although, if the theory, that percent do not pull cards in principle, but simply perform their tasks in parallel.
Metallov3r
Here you can see more. http://www.ferra.ru/ru/system/review/experiment-cpu-for-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-amd-radeon-rx-480/#.WAKQxeiLSUk
Will podrazhanie percent to 3.5-3.8 GHz and norms will.
Spoiler
SSD drive don't forget, hard another bottleneck, your i5 does not already support PCI express 3.0, there seems to exchange data with the card faster.
I bought a GTX 950 and no problems.why the hell vidyuhi for these prices?better to actually take 950 and ososki to buy.
1060 GTX 3Gb is a waste without a video card, which in a year will be useless. You need to take the 6Gb GTX 1060.
_i_D_D_Q_D_
The experts of the children's time is out..)
In the meantime, the old guard would help )
I think that with 3GB 1060, the budget default, today almost the best option, but it's better to tighten your belt to 1060 with 6GB, if you listen to Klitschko and to look to the future, then 1060 6GB performance today, smooth or slightly faster 1060 3GB. For a year or two will pull the game on hard is good, but 3GB in a satisfactory manner.
+1 for 1060 6GB
in the three gigs I do not see sense including taking into account a kilo of ruble savings.
warp 37 wrote:
1060 GTX 3Gb is a waste without a video card, which in a year will be useless. You need to take the 6Gb GTX 1060.
Oh well, my tub with the GTX 660 pulls even new games on high graphics, what are you talking about? I know what I need to take the best and most expensive, but I am one of those mortals who have the limit, though 50 euros can throw it.
Metallov3r wrote:
Oh well, my tub with the GTX 660 pulls even new games on high graphics, what are you talking about? I know what I need to take the best and most expensive, but I am one of those mortals who have the limit, though 50 euros can throw it.
Yes, you sir are a lover of the choicest perversions from 10 fps to play.
Metallov3r
>Rate my trough if I should take a GTX 1060 3GB (power supply stop) or my percent don't get it and I just spend the money in vain?
If money is not very tight, then it is better to pay more and buy a 6 GB version. Given the appetite for new games and for the developers to optimize, 3 GB for ultra settings in half the games will be enough. But if higher settings are satisfied, then three gigabytes will be enough.
DjDuke
>Yes, you sir are a lover of the choicest perversions from 10 fps to play.
Lol, even my GTX 750 Ti produces more than playable frame rate (close to 60 FPS) on high graphics settings in almost any modern game.
Fade Baker wrote:
Lol, even my GTX 750 Ti produces more than playable frame rate (close to 60 FPS) on high graphics settings in almost any modern game.
Well, Yes, Yes. Mafia 3, Quantum Break, Deus Ex: Mankind Divided, Rise of the Tomb Raider on high settings at 60 fps yeah.
Not seen in the most recent projects, the level of graphics, which would not have been able to take my печ760 to 2 gig with a moderate acceleration. Sometimes it feels intentional pitch new, in fact - useless iron. About 60 nobody says, but 20-30, somewhere in ultra, somewhere on high in 1080p and it's on my gag. Playable, better than consoles for sure. Taking 1060 6 gigs, you will provide yourself with the opportunity to check out the coolest game of new generation, at least 5 years. Then have something to reduce or to sacrifice the treasured staff.