RX 470 (4Gb) vs GTX 1060 (3Gb)
For a long time was without the card, my 780Ti was sold a year ago for$ 500. Since the game for me has long moved away a little into the background, decided to allocate new only 250$. And when I looked what is going on in the market is slightly ofigel. How is it possible that nVidia sells higher-performance product at a lower price relative to AMD? What has changed for this year?It was always clear that memory capacity is not important and remember the days when video card manufacturers were not put at the time 2GB of memory and sold them for pennies hoping for a sucker, as only 800 MB then it was enough to wipe the dust various offers.
But in the days when 4Gb may not be enough, nVidia still with their three gigs is killing AMD but puts its price tag is not twice as expensive, but also cheaper, while that of the GTX 1060 fps in some games may be higher by almost two times than that of the RX 470.
Can anyone dispel my doubts on this? In fact where's the catch? Did AMD beat Intel and nVidia in a few months so that takes the money not for performance, but for the brand?
----------------------
UPD all disturbances above at the moment are out of date, as speculation of prices RX 470 come to naught and the pricing was ustakanitsya. However, the topic based on the content of your title remains relevant.
MunchkiN 616
MunchkiN 616 wrote:
as it is we are either talking about some other time or on other maps.
It was the summer of 2005. I at first wanted to purchase a 6800 ultra but as luck would have it, or a part of them was not available in stores (back then I lived in the far East in the town of Blagoveshchensk) and then I find out about the 7800. I'm no psychic that AMD will roll out something and to wait already bothered that I bought a 7800 GT which at that time was faster than AMD cards. The truth 7800 GT, too, was not in the city but it quickly brought on a plane (for 2 days as I remember).
If 1060, then the ROG 1060 in Moscow 23-25K, that's where the map rules) Again, if you play at 1080, 1440 MB.
Shock Burst
No, I'm a realist.Syndicate with 2xmsaa drops to 54 frames, deus ex 58 with 2xmsaa, quantum 54.It is more dispersed on the map. 1080 does not pull even in 1080p
No options - 1060 6 GB, the price difference is not very large, and covers much more for a long time. Otherwise, I probably would have taken the RX, because at the present time, the number of memory plays a role. Now even some meat eating 6GB of memory on Ulrich in FHD, such as Space Engineers.
And I have гтх660 and I hvataet of those games kotori play but operative 8 gig pritik such as galaxy civilization 3 writes eats 4 gig of operative and actually eats a 6 gig total loading of 7.72 gig
6GB is already enough now, they were relevant 2 years ago with the release of Mordor and Polish darksouls (there had to be 6 gigs for ultra textures). Now, 6 GB is a gag, next year will have 8 gigs. So at least worth taking 1070, no less.
In short I bought one and the other)) RX 470 Color Power Red Devil 4Gb and the MSI Gaming GTX 1060 X 3GB, so I have both (will decide what to keep) write if you want them to test somewhere, I might take some video later. Both cost me 460$
N1KО
In vain, the ideal is now for 1080 no cost to take then 1060 MSI or ASUS top version with 6Gb, price in 23 leads happy for such a card, both quiet keep the frequency 2000-2100 / 8500+, so that 1080/1440 enough. MSI in my opinion is better put friend the other day, quiet card, great overclocking, raised her frequency, happy. In the system the 1080 monitor, the DSR is enabled, so living with 1440
Only took 1060 6 gb is a very weak card, but the truth tests (in fps games) and so talking about it - it is at the level of 980 (same fps in games) it is Possible that the 780ti is slightly weaker.
And memory so: put GTA on all max settings - eats more than 4 GB, but the game is not drawn, the fps drops. Reduce graphics to the game worked well - eats up 3 GB of video memory.
So think for yourself whether it makes sense to overpay
Mr.Sirocco
The point is that given our price 1060 to 6Gb almost twice as expensive. Yes, if you buy 3Gb of us, the difference is not so big, but as I wrote above, I bought them from Amazon (to take 6Gb nebylo opportunity), even poyuzat some time, I can sell it for the same money and even heating even on top of the hashing, so in any case I will be in profit.
Traun
That 1060 level on the 980, no reason to say that it is weak, and Vice versa :)
how would the 980 is already high-end. And what about the GTA and whether or not to pay, it is good you noticed.
N1KО
I was naive. I took 1060, and see that not vytyagivat top and poorly optimized game, I think that I 23 to pay, and then went through the tests, these games pull 1070 (with natehoy) 1080, 980 ti, titan - but they cost accordingly. So for the money it is the best choice, as I understand it and its competitor from AMD is ahead.
And it turns out my 2 gb 770 is still relevant, by the way I sell, can not