Who will play?? (For Honor)
The game will be released at 17, but vsozhe your preferences warriors (Viking, samurai, knight.)I personally like samurai, but you can for Viking pianitsa, but the knights as it is not impressive, for the ones I have Chivalry.
In General, it will be necessary to try out all the picture.
It is necessary to try the fact that the games rarely glimpsed,samurai, respectively
Frontier buccaneer
....like you said the game is very meh for the first person and the gunman was not very good, IMHO.
Plus purely multiplayer and ugly even at the time.
pavloalex
Then what do you think is better? Not counting For Honor.
On taste and color all the markers are different. I personally like Chivalry, especially fun to play on servers where the limbs and head cut.
Samurai - bullshit, the local heroes at a private island, in a real fight against a knight or a Viking, they're nothing. It's like our European pigeon with Dodo to compare. So either Viking or a knight.
pavloalex wrote:
....like you said the game is very meh for the first person and the gunman was not very good, IMHO.
Plus purely multiplayer and ugly even at the time.
...as if For Honor fights is so-so and the cartoon monotonous
Depending on the...
If no difference, then for knight.
If you have to, then at the story component.
A generally interesting for all, since the weapon is different, ie combat technique difference, it will be interesting who and how.
Although, I think that skill decides)
At least, what is seen on video talking about it.